My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/26/2002 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
06/26/2002 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 1:55:19 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 1:56:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
06/26/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING APRIL 24, 2002 <br />Asleson noted the use of hackberries along the Northern edge. Donlin responded <br />that they were not thick enough to block the view and suggested berming. <br />Asleson explained that hackberries take 3 -4 years to become established. <br />Schneider liked the hackberries because they were good for wildlife, and were a <br />good long -term choice. <br />Grundhofer noted that they were planning to use maples on site. <br />Grundhofer mentioned landscaping fennel reed grass, but she could not find any <br />information on it. Asleson indicated he did not think it would be a problem, but <br />would check. <br />Chair Kukonen reviewed the recommendations from tb Board that included: <br />• Work with the RCWD and City staff <br />• Lighting should have no spillage, be do <br />the number of fixtures. <br />• Work with City staff to create buffed <br />• Replace maple with some other a <br />• Reduce impervious parking spas <br />Netlawn pervious parking. <br />• Concern over the gas station and the; <br />as a lake protection zon a1. having <br />ecies <br />and maximize the use of <br />e reduction of <br />of a spill into the area defined <br />ogical value. <br />Schneider made a motion to orb staff recommendations along with the Board <br />recommends Donl n seconded emotion. Motion passed unanimously. <br />Schneider. <br />complia <br />obscure to <br />be a number in the recommendation to ensure <br />recommendation, and not to leave it at the <br />B. Raske Builds = ems, Inc. <br />Asleson reviewed the background. The Board had reviewed the plan at the <br />October 1, 2001, meeting, so the recommendations made at that time still apply. <br />The only item left to review was the landscaping plan. His only concern was the <br />small cedars on the site, they were going to be removed, but he would like to see <br />then used elsewhere on the site. He highlighted the standard recommendations, <br />and the Board recommendations on Attachment 1 Options. <br />Donlin expressed concern over the surface water, inquiring if the owners of the <br />two lots were going to work together. Asleson indicated that the wetland was a <br />pond. <br />4 DRAFT MINUTES <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.