My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/28/2002 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
08/28/2002 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2014 11:03:52 AM
Creation date
8/1/2014 10:18:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
08/28/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JUNE 26, 2002 <br />will also be a telephone number of the property buyer, so he can contact them. He <br />gave the example that according to the Land Classification, there were significant <br />woodlands. These could now have more protection than previously. Significant <br />trees would not be limited to size specifications, but if the trees had a function <br />such as buffering around a wetland. There would also be specifications for a <br />specimen tree also known as a tree standing alone. <br />Grundhofer inquired about the timeline that the escrowed dollars would be held <br />by the City. Asleson responded that the City would hold the money for 5 -7 years. <br />Donlin agreed that trees could take a slow decline, that might not be apparent at <br />the end of the project. Asleson concurred that if they violate the plan, and the <br />trees showed signs of decline in that time period ;' uld be responsible for <br />replacement. <br />Donlin expressed concern that the buildi : _ rs ' "=' inspectors. <br />Asleson responded that it would be as sim • the fence wn the <br />building could not be inspected until it was * The building inspectors <br />were on the site almost every day for van us part s . oject. <br />Chair Kukonen stated that the gradi <br />Preservation Plan instead of the re <br />subdivision ordinance with less <br />would speed up the process. <br />10% on all new developme <br />Asleson commm <br />an example <br />Chair K <br />Departmen <br />overlaid on the Tree <br />about the minor <br />he newly modified one <br />a new park dedication fee of <br />inquired about <br />on respond <br />the City of Blaine's approach to parks as <br />sleson's anticipation of a struggle with our Parks <br />that he did not. <br />explained f a th qty of Lino Lakes was trying to shift from a growing <br />city to a mature city. <br />Asleson noted the zoning districts and planned developments were tools. The R- <br />1XC was going to be an improvement. <br />Donlin mentioned the issue of street lights. <br />Chair Kukonen inquired if the City had an ordinance for street lights. O'Connell <br />asked if something could be done about outside lighting on houses, specifically all <br />the solar powered lights. <br />6 DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.