10/30/2002 Env Bd Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Item -by -item guidance Chapter ■ d. These items identify past or future stages of the project and describe how the present EAW relates to prior or future review. If the answer to either part of d is °yes,' it is likely that the project is related to other developments as a "phased action' or a 'con- nected action' as defined by the EQB rules at part 4410.0200, subpart 60 and 9b, respectively. The rules require that all parts of these actions be reviewed as a single project. The RGU should refer to the EQB rules (parts 4410.1000, subpart 4 and 4410.2000, subpart 4) and Chapter 2 of the Guide to Minnesota Environmental Review Rules to ensure that the complete project has been reviewed in the EAW. If the project is a residential project, relevant requirements are at part 4410.4300, subpart 19 and part 4410.4400, subpart 14. Also note that the certification at the end of the form asks the RGU to verify that it has complied with the requirements for reviewing the complete project. 7. Project magnitude data This item asks for certain data that help quantify the magnitude of the project. Depending on the type of project, some of the data requested may not be applicable, in which case simply leave the item blank. • Total project area or length. For linear projects such as roads, pipelines, sewers or electric transmission lines, the length should be given; for other projects the area should be given. If the total acres involved in a linear project are known, give both area and length. • Residential units. Single family, duplex and triplex units are considered unattached while four or more units to a building are attached. Each individual dwelling unit counts as one attached unit; therefore, a 24 -unit apartment building has 24 attached units. • Commercial, industrial and institutional building ar- eas. The form asks for a total of the gross floor space for any project of a commercial, industrial or institutional nature such as a school, prison or hospital. Count all floors of all enclosed struc- tures on the site except for any space used for parking. The form also asks for a breakdown of the total among nine subclasses of commercial, industrial and institutional space. This should be self - explanatory except for 'agricultural,' which is intended primarily for the building areas of feedlot projects. If you are uncertain about where something fits, list it under "other commercial" and describe what it is. • Building heights. List at least the maximum height of the buildings; provide more information where appropriate, such as an office complex with two or more towers of varying sizes, or an office tower with a communications tower mounted on top. A comparison to the heights of other nearby buildings is required if any buildings will exceed two stories. 8. Permits and approvals required List the permits, approvals, reviews and financing required or sought from all government agencies prior to the beginning of the project. Include any necessary regional reviews and approvals from agencies such as the Metropolitan Council. Include approv- als already obtained and any modifications of any existing permits. A comprehensive listing of state and local permits can be obtained from the Minnesota Small Business Assistance Office listed in the appendix. The local unit's planning and zoning office can also help identify necessary permits. Federal permits most likely to be required would be from the Army Corps of Engineers or the Fish and Wildlife Service; listed in the Appendix. Any public funding or support must now be listed, including Tax Increment Financing, public infrastructure constructed to assist the project, bond guarantees and other forms of public assistance or subsidies. If a potential environmental impact will or can be addressed by conditions of any required permits or approvals, this should be discussed in the EAW. See also item 31, which provides an oppor- tunity to explain how potential impacts can be mitigated through permit and approval conditions. When an EAW is required or ordered, no final decision to grant any govemmental permit or approval (including financial assis- tance) can be made until either a decision has been made that no EIS is needed or until an EIS has been completed. See part 4410.3100 or Chapter 2 of the Guide to Minnesota Environmental Review Rules. In some cases there may be permits previously issued for activities on or near the project site that are relevant to the review of the proposed project. This is most likely where the proposed project is an expansion of an existing project, but could occur under other conditions as well, for example, if a past dredging project permit- ted by the Corps of Engineers or the DNR placed soil on the proposed project site. These permits should be identified, includ- ing the permit number and issuing agency. This information can either be presented under this item or preferably under the items most relevant to the nature of the permit. 9. Land use The point of this question is two -fold: (1) to identify any past land uses on the site which might contribute to present environmental concerns such as soil contamination from past industrial use; and (2) to identify any potential conflicts between the project and existing surrounding land uses with environmental aspects that may require mitigation. A typical example would be a gravel operation proposed next to a residential area: dust and noise could cause significant conflicts with the residential land use. The form asks whether potential land use conflicts involve environ- mental matters because not all land use conflicts do. For example, heavy truck traffic from a gravel mine near a residential area may Environmental Quality Board 7