Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />12. Physical impacts on water resources. Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration — <br />dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, and impoundment of any surface waters such <br />as a lake, pond, wetland, stream or drainage ditch? IEI Yes 0 No <br />If yes, identify water resource affected and give the DNR Protected Waters Inventory number(s) if the <br />water resources affected are on the PWI: #10P . Describe alternatives considered and proposed <br />mitigation measures to minimize impacts. <br />Protected water #10P is Wards Lake, defined by the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of <br />883.7. Wetlands with cattails and other wetland vegetation can be found along the edges of <br />the water. The wetland delineation shows that the wetland edge and the OHWL are nearly <br />identical, varying in some places by up to 15 feet horizontally. A wetland delineation and <br />wetland permit application narrative can be found in Exhibit D. <br />The proposed project includes a 300 foot bridge to span a wetland/lake area to connect to an <br />upland island. The bridge would consist of two bridge sections of 150 feet each. The <br />preliminary design has one pier in the center of the bridge, in the lake (below the ordinary <br />high water level). This central pier will have an approximate footprint of 100 square feet. <br />The plan is to construct the bridge abutments, on each end of the bridge, outside of delineated <br />wetlands. Fill for bridge approaches then would be entirely outside the wetland boundaries. <br />This would need to be examined as the design of the bridge progresses beyond a preliminary <br />stage. <br />Alternative accesses to the proposed bridge have been discussed. One alternative is creating <br />an earthen bridge by filling below the OHWL to provide access to the property. Although the <br />least expensive, this alternative was not considered a desired alternative because of impacts <br />to the lake and wetlands. <br />A second alternative is a "flatter" bridge design. Flat bridge designs require more piers. The <br />original design reviewed by the DNR for bridge permit approval showed five piers. <br />Although approved, the design was later revised to show one pier after finding a bridge <br />company that could design a bridge effectively with one pier. The location shown requires a <br />300 foot span bridge using one pier. Additional piers would require additional fill and <br />construction dewatering. <br />Regarding the location of the bridge access, the wetland /lake spans approximately 500 feet to <br />the west and to the south to the nearest high ground. A bridge from either of these directions <br />would require additional piers and corresponding fill and construction dewatering. <br />The stormwater management plan has been designed to minimize impacts of runoff. Proper <br />construction is extremely important in ensuring the successful operation of the stormwater <br />management plan. The following recommendations will be incorporated in the final plans <br />and specifications. <br />• A "preservation area" has been incorporated into the stormwater plan. This area is <br />located on the north side of the island. Because it is downhill from the building sites, <br />Environmental Assessment Worksheet Page 8 Pheasant Hills 12`h Addition <br />