My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/15/2004 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2004
>
07/15/2004 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2014 12:19:53 PM
Creation date
8/4/2014 2:24:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
07/15/2004
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday; no work on Sundays or holidays. Sound levels can be <br />monitored and if the maximum level is exceeded, adjustments can be made to the methods being <br />used. <br />The other aspect of the pile driving activity is the potential for impacts from vibration. If the <br />project proceeds, the City will require a pre - construction survey and monitoring program based <br />on specifications used by MnDOT. The specifics would need to be determined further, but the <br />program would include elements such as: <br />1. A pre - construction building survey within 100 feet of the project to document the existing <br />exterior and interior conditions <br />2. Crack displacement monitoring gauges to help verify distress if any should develop <br />3. Continuously recording seismographs <br />4. Submittal of a plan identifying schedule, vibration, equipment, and monitoring log <br />5. Records of construction location, hours worked, depth, and equipment generating the <br />vibrations <br />6. Submittal of construction logs weekly including complaints <br />7. A test program prior to beginning activities to demonstrate the requirements can be met <br />8. Sound levels should not exceed 90 decibels measured at 50 feet <br />9. Maximum vibration levels could be established. If these limits are exceeded, the contractor <br />would have to cease the activity exceeding the limit and design corrective action. <br />10. In addition to these elements, a reasonable financial security could be established to repair <br />any damage to existing structures. This could involve third party arbitration to determine the <br />fairness of a claim and the appropriate remedy. <br />Such a program would establish requirements to protect existing structures and means to enforce <br />the requirements. While the above list represents a reasonable approach, it may be appropriate to <br />adjust the specifics of these requirements depending on specific equipment, additional soils <br />information, the new bridge design, or other information. <br />Water Quality Impacts <br />Some impact on water quality will occur with the dewatering and other activities as part of <br />construction of the bridge. The original design reviewed by the DNR for bridge permit approval <br />showed five piers. Although approved, the design was later revised to show one pier and two <br />150 -foot spans. The most recent five -pier design will require additional fill and construction <br />dewatering. These impacts will be temporary. <br />A "preservation area" has been incorporated into the stormwater plan. This area is located on the <br />north side of the island. Because it is downhill from the building sites, flow control and water <br />quality are enhanced by flow dispersion through duff, undisturbed soils, and native vegetation. <br />The preserved area will be clearly marked during clearing and construction on the site. The <br />project approval can include a mechanism to protect this area such as covenants or a <br />conservation easement. <br />Erosion control measures will be implemented during construction in accordance with the Best <br />Management Practices contained in the MPCA Stormwater Construction Permit program to <br />DRAFT July 1, 2004 <br />Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addn. EAW Record of Decision <br />page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.