Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />minimize impact to areas susceptible to erosion. These measures will include the use of silt <br />fences, temporary sediment basins, cut off swales, rock construction entrances, cleaning of <br />adjacent streets as needed, rip rap at storm outfalls, silt fence around storm inlets during <br />construction, and timely revegetation of all disturbed areas. The site will be monitored by the <br />Rice Creek Watershed District and the City engineer for erosion and defective erosion control <br />measures. <br />The close proximity of proposed stormwater ponds to a waterbody always raises the question <br />about groundwater and a pond's real capacity. If the normal groundwater level causes water to <br />partially fill a pond, it may not have adequate capacity if this is not accounted for in its design. <br />The proposed ponds on the island must comply with current standards and function as designed. <br />This is a normal element of project review by both the City and the Rice Creek Watershed <br />District. <br />A condition regarding no disturbing wetlands beyond 100 feet from the back of their homes can <br />be included in the project requirements and recorded against all properties as a platting <br />requirement. This was part of the developer's discussions with the DNR regarding the bridge <br />permit. <br />Regarding the location of the bridge, the lake (and bordering wetlands) spans approximately 500 <br />feet to the west and to the south to the nearest high ground. A bridge from either of these <br />directions would require additional piers and corresponding fill and construction dewatering. <br />Visual Impacts <br />Any new development will alter the appearance of an area. In addition to the new houses, the <br />proposed bridge will change the visual appearance of the area for several residents of the existing <br />Quail Ridge development. A 300 ft. bridge is not a common aspect of new development, and <br />those residents might consider the bridge an adverse visual impact. A view of undeveloped <br />wetland and woods may well be considered scenic, though the views of wetlands and woods in <br />the project area are not unique in Lino Lakes or surrounding communities. <br />The more recent proposal, which returns to an original five -span, flat bridge design, reduces the <br />visual impact considerably. The City can require the use of wooden railings, which will fit into <br />the wooded environment. The two -span truss bridge would be a greater visual impact because of <br />the tall trusses. <br />There will be a visual impact, and it will be permanent. However, the extent of the impact will <br />be similar to the type and extent of changes that occur when new roads are constructed and <br />homes are built in previously undeveloped areas. <br />Historic and Archaeological Resources <br />A background review of records, literature and archaeological research relevant to the history <br />and prehistory of the area was carried out. No previously recorded archaeological or <br />historical /architectural properties have been recorded in the area. A Phase I archaeological <br />survey was carried out in November of 2000. No historic or prehistoric remains were found in <br />DRAFT July 1, 2004' <br />Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addn. EAW Record of Decision <br />page 5 <br />