My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/15/2004 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2004
>
07/15/2004 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2014 12:19:53 PM
Creation date
8/4/2014 2:24:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
07/15/2004
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• the project area. The survey was submitted to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for <br />comment. The SHPO raised no issues with the survey. <br />• <br />• <br />Property Boundary, Regional Park Reserve <br />The preliminary plat, Figure 11 in the EAW, shows the property boundaries. The northern <br />border of the property cuts off approximately 30 feet of the northern tip of the island. Property <br />north of this line is within the regional park reserve and is owned by Anoka County. This is <br />within an area acquired by the City by eminent domain in 1997 -98 and conveyed to Anoka <br />County. The surveying needed for the development project was more extensive and detailed <br />than what was prepared for the eminent domain action. The more detailed survey revealed that <br />the property border cuts off a tip of the island. <br />While this is unfortunate and creates a clumsy situation, it has no serious effect on the park <br />reserve or the proposed project. The project grading plan does not include disturbing the tip of <br />the island that is north of the boundary line. <br />SUMMARY OF ISSUES <br />The main environmental issues are noise and vibration from the pile driving activity during <br />construction, and the visual impact of the bridge. <br />Noise: The noise from the pile driving will be unpleasant for nearby residents. It will be <br />temporary the duration of the bridge construction. Construction hours will be limited by a <br />standard city requirement in all development agreements: 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday <br />through Friday; 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday; no work on Sundays or holidays. <br />Vibration: As with construction noise, this is a temporary, though unpleasant impact. A pre - <br />construction survey and ongoing monitoring program, as well as additional financial security, <br />will be required. <br />Visual: A flat bridge design will minimize the visual impacts compared to a truss bridge. While <br />the bridge will be visible, it will be only about 10 feet higher than the tops of the vegetation. <br />The City can require the use of wooden railings, which will fit into the wooded environment. <br />There will be a visual impact, and it will be permanent. However, the extent of the impact will <br />be similar to the type and extent of changes that occur when new roads are constructed and <br />homes are built in previously undeveloped areas. <br />In addition, the following issues will require future attention or enforcement and will be <br />addressed as part of the plat review and approval: <br />1. The City will require a specific and extensive tree preservation plan for the plat and <br />individual plans for custom graded lots. These are required in the City's newly adopted <br />subdivision and zoning ordinances. <br />DRAFT July 1, 2004 <br />Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addn. EAW Record of Decision <br />page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.