Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />two cycles per second and the maximum particle velocity recorded, even as close as 15 to 20 <br />feet from the pile driver, is generally less than one inch per second. On this basis, there <br />should be no damage to the nearest house, which is 70 feet from one end of the bridge. It <br />should be noted that the human body is quite sensitive, and thus occupants of the house might <br />feel some small vibrations, or some crockery may rattle during the pile driving, but the effects <br />on the structure should be none or negligible. A figure showing safe vibration levels for <br />residential structures is attached as Exhibit G. <br />If the project proceeds, the City will require a pre - construction survey and monitoring <br />program based on specifications used by MnDOT. This could involve: <br />1. a pre - construction building survey within 100' of the project to document the existing <br />exterior and interior conditions <br />2. crack displacement monitoring gauges to help verify distress if any should develop <br />3. continuously recording seismographs <br />4. submittal of a plan identifying schedule, vibration, equipment, and monitoring log <br />5. records of construction location, hours worked, depth, and equipment generating the <br />vibrations <br />6. submittal of construction logs weekly including complaints <br />7. a test program prior to beginning activities to demonstrate the requirements can be <br />met <br />8. sound levels should not exceed 90 decibels measured at 50 feet <br />Maximum vibration levels could be established. If these limits are exceeded, the contractor <br />would have to cease the activity exceeding the limit and design corrective action. <br />25. Nearby resources. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site? <br />Archaeological, historical or architectural resources? ❑ Yes El No <br />Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? ❑ Yes El No <br />Designated parks, recreation areas or trails? 0 Yes ❑ No <br />Scenic views and vistas? Q Yes ❑ No <br />Other unique resources? ❑ Yes El No <br />If yes, describe the resource and identify any project - related impacts on the resource. Describe any <br />measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. <br />• A background review of records, literature and archaeological research relevant to the <br />history and prehistory of the area was carried out. No previously recorded archaeological <br />or historical/architectural properties have been recorded in the area. However, there are <br />numerous archaeological sites in the area of the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes, mostly <br />located along lakeshores. Based upon this, the project area was determined to have <br />potential for archaeology. <br />A Phase I archaeological survey was carried out in November of 2000 (see Exhibit E). <br />No historic or prehistoric remains were found in the project area. The report of these <br />Environmental Assessment Worksheet <br />Page 18 Pheasant Hills 12`h Addition <br />