Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />findings has been submitted to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for their <br />comment. The SHPO review number for the project is 2001 -3540. <br />• The soils of the site are not prime farmlands for the region. Most of the land surrounding <br />the eight proposed lots is wetland. This land would only be suitable for rice or other <br />wetland suitable crops. The majority of the upland is wooded and sloped and would need <br />to be cleared and leveled for agricultural purposes. <br />• The property to the north of the proposed development is within the Rice Creek Chain of <br />Lakes Regional Park Preserve. There are no trails present or planned within the park <br />reserve near the proposed project site. The only access to the park reserve from the <br />proposed project would be by water. The residential development would not generate <br />activity that would impact the park. <br />The wetland area surrounding the Quail Ridge development was dedicated to the City <br />with the Quail Ridge plat for parkland purposes. Part of this dedicated area is located <br />between the proposed development and the Quail Ridge development. <br />• In regard to "scenic views and vistas ", the EAW Guidelines states: <br />These may include spectacular viewing points along lakes, rivers or bluffs; virgin <br />timber tracts; prairie remnants; geological features; waterfalls; specimen trees; or <br />plots of wildflowers. Many are not officially designated or marked, but because of <br />their local or statewide interest should be considered by the RGU. Impacts on the <br />visual quality or integrity of these resources should be addressed as well as the <br />physical impacts. <br />A view of undeveloped wetland and woods may well be considered scenic. "Spectacular <br />view" is probably an exaggeration in this case, since the views of wetlands and woods in <br />the project area are common in many areas of Lino Lakes and surrounding communities. <br />If the project proceeds, the view for existing nearby residents will include houses that were <br />not there before, and a bridge. The appearance of new homes is a common change in any <br />outer suburb in a metropolitan area. However, a bridge is an unusual sight in residential <br />developments, and a bridge 300 feet long would be a significant change to the view of <br />several residents. <br />26. Visual impacts. Will the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operation such as <br />glare from intense lights, lights visible in wilderness areas and large visible plumes from cooling towers or <br />exhaust stacks? 0 Yes Q No If yes, explain. <br />No construction will occur beyond daylight hours. No glare or intense lights are proposed <br />during construction or after completion of this residential project. The project is not part of <br />any state designated wilderness area. <br />Environmental Assessment Worksheet <br />Page 19 Pheasant Hills 121" Addition <br />