My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/31/2006 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2006
>
05/31/2006 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2014 3:11:16 PM
Creation date
8/6/2014 9:18:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
05/31/2006
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Or) <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />SPECIAL JOINT MEETING MAY 31, 2006 <br />APPROVED <br />very unique plant community. The area is in need of restoration and stewardship. The <br />plan that has been put together would result in the rare plant life flourishing. <br />Mr. Schoenbauer provided a power point presentation that included the conservation <br />development background, public values and economic realities. <br />Mr. Schoenbauer presented the proposed plan in comparison to a traditional development. <br />Comparisons included number of residential units and proposed trails. He reviewed <br />images, economic impacts and the phasing plan. He also noted the basic agreement <br />parameters in terms of the developer and the City. <br />Community Development Director Grochala introduced Mr. Rick Carlson and Mr. John <br />Peterson, developers of the proposed plan. He indicated the developers have been very <br />cooperative and eager to work with the City on this project. <br />Discussion — Mr. Schoenbauer stated staff and the development team would like <br />feedback to determine if they are going in the right direction with the project. <br />Concerns and issues raised through the discussion included the following: <br />1. Impact on wildlife and breeding of wildlife <br />2. Creation of a wildlife and Blanding corridor <br />3. Destroying forest areas and mature trees <br />4. Management of stewardship <br />5. Water run -off <br />6. Philosophy of sub - contractors <br />7. Traffic <br />8. Construction of sidewalks throughout the development <br />9. Developer contribution to infrastructure <br />10. Enforcement and accountability of developers agreement <br />The majority of those present indicated support for the project and believes the City is <br />going in the right direction with this type of development. <br />The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. <br />These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on <br />June 26, 2006. <br />PAPP ariserti <br />e Bartell, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor <br />Transcribed by: <br />Kim Points <br />TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.