My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/25/2007 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2007
>
07/25/2007 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2014 1:07:39 PM
Creation date
8/7/2014 9:23:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
07/25/2007
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />event (Paragraph 3(b)(ii)(b)). For sites with Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) soil types A <br />and B, the emphasis will be on infiltration. For sites with HSG soil types C and D, <br />biofiltration and detention will be permitted to a greater extent. <br />A property owner would be required to present an explicit analysis of site design <br />practices that will limit impervious cover, preserve natural areas and retain the natural <br />infiltration capacity of a property (Paragraph 3(b)(ii)(a)). If site volume retention and <br />water quality criteria cannot be met because of unsuitable soils, high groundwater or <br />circumstances that make infiltration undesirable (e.g., site contamination), a property <br />owner then should seek to utilize biofiltration or filtration methods. Only after those <br />methods have been explored may a property owner resort to detention in a natural or <br />artificial basin as a means of meeting water quality criteria (Paragraph 3(b)(ii)(a), (e)). <br />The existing requirement for use of a detention basin would be deleted. <br />A prominent addition to the stormwater rule would be a separate set of volume control <br />and water quality criteria for linear projects, such as roads and trails, built by road <br />authorities and other public bodies (Paragraph 3(b)(ii)(f)). Because these projects very <br />frequently involve constrained right -of -way in developed areas, infiltration may be <br />challenging. Further, roadways and similar linear surfaces require periodic resurfacing <br />or reconstruction and are subject to minor alterations. Applying the standard criteria <br />to these activities in many cases would impose an expense on communities <br />disproportionate to the work being undertaken and could create incentives for units of <br />government to defer ordinary infrastructure maintenance. <br />Accordingly, the proposed rule would subject a linear project to the standard criterion <br />- infiltrating or retaining the 2.8 -inch storm -- if the project would create an acre or <br />more of new impervious surface. However, if the project would not meet this <br />threshold, if it involves simply conversion to urban section (curb and gutter), or if it <br />involves expanding or reconstructing an existing roadway /trail, facilities need be sized <br />only to capture the 0.8 -inch rain event. Again, mill and overlay without an increase in <br />surface area would not be subject to the rule. <br />Proposed site design practices and Best Management Practices will need to conform to <br />standard reference documents. However, the proposed rule also would incorporate <br />certain specific design criteria. <br />First, pretreatment will be required before discharge to infiltration (Paragraph 3(c)(i)). <br />Pretreatment lengthens the performance period of an infiltration practice and reduces <br />its maintenance frequency. Numerous studies have observed that infiltration practices <br />are susceptible to soil clogging and can fail due to the absence of pretreatment. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.