My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/25/2007 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2007
>
07/25/2007 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2014 1:07:39 PM
Creation date
8/7/2014 9:23:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
07/25/2007
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />exception is to not discourage property owners from taking steps necessary to <br />protect shorelands from erosion and destabilization. <br />VII. RULE F: WETLAND ALTERATION <br />The wetlands rule would be extensively revised, in the main to reflect the field and <br />project- review experience of RCWD staff. A number of criteria, particularly concerning <br />the performance of wetland delineations and replacement requirements, would be <br />added to supplement the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and apply as well <br />to RCWD permitting of wetland disturbance not subject to WCA. <br />Under the present rule, any proposed wetland disturbance not subject to WCA is <br />evaluated by the RCWD under a general criterion that prohibits activity that would <br />"change the character" of a wetland without preserving wetland quantity, quality and <br />biological diversity (present Paragraph 3(d)). The proposed rule would subject such <br />activities to a replacement requirement subject to specific WCA and additional criteria <br />(Paragraph 3(b)). The terms of RCWD regulation would be further refined as follows: <br />• Replacement for non -WCA impacts would be required at a ratio of 1:1 (an acre <br />of replacement wetland for each acre of disturbed wetland) (Paragraph 3(c)). <br />However, replacement in the form of the restoration of degraded wetland would <br />receive double acreage credit. The purpose of this provision is to create an <br />incentive for wetland restoration. The RCWD believes that all other things being <br />equal, wetland restoration is more likely than new wetland creation to succeed, <br />and further that the function and value of restored wetland is more predictable. <br />The proposed replacement, though, still would need to demonstrate <br />preservation of wetland quality and function equivalent to that lost as a result of <br />the wetland disturbance. <br />• Replacement would not be required for a wetland disturbance that does not <br />change wetland type, function, quantity, quality or biological diversity <br />(Paragraph 3(d)). <br />The following criteria also are proposed to apply to wetland replacement under both <br />WCA and RCWD standards, as applicable: <br />• Sequencing (avoidance, minimization, replacement) analysis would be required <br />• to address each contiguous wetland area separately (Paragraph 5(a)). <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.