Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08/29/2007 Env Bd Packet
Memorandum To: Environmental Board Members Date: 8/24/07 Re: SHEP Please find attached correspondence from Barbara Bor concerning SHEP. • • • • Hello SHEP Crew 2007! Thanks again for participating in this important volunteer project. The health of these streams, and the watershed, could not be assessed without your help. Below is a reminder and details about this Saturday's training as well as the new October training dates. Directions to Wargo Nature Center are available via the Wargo link below and are also copied below this main message. If you have any remaining questions on how to get there, the Nature Center can be reached at 651- 429 -8007. If you have any questions about the training, please contact Trevor Russell, the Watershed Program Director, at 651- 222 -2193 x18. (If it's urgent, Trevor's cell is 651- 274 -3336. This number is also given in his outgoing message.) Unfortunately, I cannot be there Saturday, but you will be in good hands with Trevor and the MPCA and Minnesota Waters scientists /trainers. * SATURDAY FIELD TRAINING Saturday, August 25, 9 am -4 pm Please arrive by 8:45 a.m. for check -in and to sign important waivers. (The Center will be opening before its normal 9 a.m. start time just for SHEPers.) The training is required for participation in SHEP. This year's training will once again be led by scientists from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Minnesota Waters, and held at Wargo Nature Center. A description of and directions to this facility are available at http: // www.anokacountyparks.com /glinks /wargonc /wargonc.htm and are also copied below this main message. Our training protocol will be a little different from last year. The vast majority of the Saturday training will be field work, focused on exactly what you will need to do during the sampling phase. Supplies (such as waders and all necessary training materials), food and beverages will be provided, but you may want to bring your own waders if you have them. You will be going into the water. You will be introduced to your team leaders, meet your team members, and receive your team contact list Saturday. (For 2006 SHEPers: With only one exception [Ms. Bor is now on the Lyman -Onkka team due to scheduling], you have been placed with the teammates you worked with last year. We also have the privilege of welcoming many new faces onto the teams this year as well.) * OCTOBER LAB TRAINING There will be a separate laboratory analysis training as our lab analysis portion of SHEP gets going. This will allow us to have a more comprehensive field training prior to field activity and focus more on lab training prior to our lab sessions. This training is required in order to be involved in the laboratory /analysis portion of SHEP. It is a five and a half hour training, offered on two dates: Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2:30 -8 p.m. OR Saturday, Oct. 20, 9 a.m. -3:30 p.m. The trainings review the same material and you can attend whichever works best for you. Please email me, srich @fmr.org, to let me know which one works for you so that we can make sure we have enough materials (and snacks) for that session. (If you want to, you may attend both sessions.) We were able to work around the schedules and preferences submitted by SHEP participants, however we weren't able to shorten the Wednesday training or split it into two weekday evenings. So for those of you will be out of town on the 20th, we apologize that you may need to ask to get off work early for the October 10th training. If you think you may have difficulty doing this, or difficulty making the lab trainings at all, please let your team leader know this Saturday. * CELL PHONE REQUEST Even if you have already given me your cell phone number, it'd be great if you could send it again and also clarify whether it is your main number or your use - only -if- urgent number. Also let me know if you are uncomfortable with having your cell phone number on the team member contact lists for any reason. * PARTY! Don't forget to mark Thursday, January 17, evening, 2008 in your calendar (or calendar- to -be). All of your hard work will culminate in a report to the Rice Creek Watershed District, based upon your findings, by January 1, 2008. I know it seems like a long time to set a date, but we'd like to make sure as many of you can make it as possible so that we can recognize and celebrate the good work you've done! So please let this be one of the first dates you enter for '08 in your calendar or planner. Last year, SHEP produced terrific, reliable results and many people had a lot of fun doing it. I'm sure this year will be much the same -- if not better the second time around. Thanks again for generously offering your time and talents to this program. Sincerely, sue sue rich Volunteer Coordinator Directions to the Wargo Nature Center From Minneapolis: [Please note that I -35 is closed from the I -94/35 intersect through Stinson Blvd in northeast Minneapolis due to the bridge tragedy.] Take I -35W north to exit #36, County Road 23. Take a left onto 23 (north) to Main Street (Co. Rd. 14) and turn right (east). Go east on Co. Rd. 14, you will cross over I -35W, and continue for 1/4 mile. The entrance is on the right side of the road marked with a brown sign, Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center. From St. Paul: • • • • • Take I -35E north to exit #123, Centerville /Hugo exit (Co. Rd. 14). Turn left (west) on Co. Rd. 14 (Main Street), go through the City of Centerville's downtown area, take a right turn at the T- intersection to continue on Co. Rd 14 as it winds though the lakes. Look for the entrance on the left side of the road (about 1/2 mile past the campground entrance) marked with a brown sign, Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center. From Blaine, Coon Rapids, Anoka, Ham Lake, Andover: Take Highway 242 (Main Street) east for about 12 -15 miles, which turns into Co. Rd. 14 in Lino Lakes. You will cross over I -35W and continue for 1/2 mile. The entrance is on the right side of the road marked with a brown sign, Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center. From Columbia Heights, Fridley, Spring Lake Park: Take Highway 65 (Central Avenue) north to Highway 242 (Main Street) and turn right. Follow Highway 242 east for about 12 miles, which turns into Co. Rd. 14 in Lino Lakes. You will cross over I -35W and continue for 1/2 mile. The entrance is on the right side of the road marked with a brown sign, Joseph E. Wargo Nature Center. sue rich Volunteer Coordinator Friends of the Mississippi River 360 North Robert Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 Phone: 651/ 222 -2193 ext. 14 Fax: 651/ 222 -6005 For the latest updates on FMR events and programs, visit us on the web at http: / /www.fmr.org and /or sign up for the monthly e -mail newsletter, "Mississippi Messages ": http: / /www.fmr.org /news /messages City of Lino Lakes Environmental Board Meeting August 29, 2007 6:30 p.m. AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes July 25, 2007 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Open Mike 5. Action Items A. Water Emergency and Conservation Plan — Verne Jacobsen 6. Discussion Items A. Moon Marsh Conservation Easement B. Updates: Parade 7. Adjourn • • • • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES JULY 25, 2007 : July 25, 2007 . 6:33 P.M. . 8:25 P.M. : Mary Jo O'Dea, Peter Brown, Paula Andrzejewski and Alan Traylor, Barbara Bor, Martha DeHaven and Kimberly Brouillet : None : Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson, 1. CALL TO ORDER Ms. O'Dea called the meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 27, 2007 Ms. O'Dea had a change on page 6. A. First paragraph change restricted to restrictive. Third paragraph take the s off of conservation. Ms. Andrzejewski made a motion to approve the June 27, 2007 minutes with changes. Ms. Brouillet seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Ms. Bor made a motion to approve agenda. Ms. Brouillet seconded the motion to approve agenda. Motion carried unanimously 4. OPEN MIKE Open mike closed at 6:34 p.m. 5. ACTION ITEMS N/A 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Rice Creek Watershed District Proposed Rules 1 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JULY 25, 2007 Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) has proposed a number of changes to the Stormwater Management Plan. The RCWD invites submission of written comments to the proposed changes by August 1, 2007. Connie Taillon and Jim Studenski will be submitting comments on behalf of the City of Lino Lakes. Ms. Taillon was present to review RCWD's proposed changes and City comments. Page 1. Rule C: Stormwater Management Plan. Ms. Taillon went over the first page of her memorandum regarding proposed changes. Current: 2.5 acres. Proposed: Reduce exemption to new development, redevelopment, linear projects or additions from 2.5 acres to at least 1 acre in size. City comment: The City of Lino Lakes comment will be to add language that would define a one acre site. Page 2. Water Quality and Water Control. Current: Impervious surface runoff is currently .34 inches in 72 hours. Proposed: Under the new rules infiltration basins are required to draw down 2.8 inches within 48 hours from end of a storm event. City comment: Is RCWD's requirement of infiltration for the two year storm event for proposed conditions only? Why is RCWD not requiring existing volumes vs. proposed? In types A & B soil areas RCWD is proposing to infiltrate to pre - settlement runoff. Ms. O'Dea asked how Ms. Taillon is comparing runoff. Ms. Taillon stated they are only capturing the excess over and above the existing. She stated basins would more than likely be made smaller and onsite rather than regional and possibly offsite. Ms. O'Dea questioned alternatives to the existing. Ms. Bor stated the developer comes in and if they are using pre - existing conditions what does that mean to them? Ms. Taillon stated RCWD states not to look at existing conditions, they are saying design a system to infiltration 2.8 inches that goes to that basin with no runoff. Ms. Taillon suggested that we take this requirement out in all cases and suggested using a volume requirement. She stated we should try to mimic the existing conditions and not just look at proposed. Ms. Taillon stated the design based on existing conditions is the suggestion from the city. Page 3. Peak Flow Management. Current: Rates not to exceed "pre- project" runoff rates for the critical 1 -year or 2 year and 100 year frequency events. Proposed: In types A & B soils rates not to exceed "pre- settlement" runoff rates for the critical 2 year and 100 year frequency events for sites no covered by impervious surfaces in pre - existing condition. City comment: Would like clarification for rate control. Is it the site as a whole or is the rate to be met at every point that it discharges off the site. Page 4. Flood Protection for Structures. City comment: Define table as to local detention basins and wetlands. Ask why the RCWD lowered the low floor elevation. Infiltration basins are designed to run dry. 2 DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JULY 25, 2007 Page 4. Rule D. Erosion Control Plans: Current: Permit and erosion control plan are required for new development, redevelopment, or additions to an existing site. Proposed: Permit and an erosion control plan is required for grading, excavation, filling, or stockpiling of more than fifty (50) cubic yards of erosive material or the disturbance of removal of vegetation on five thousand square feet or more of land. City comment: This change is much more restrictive than MPCA. Clarify if the RCWD intends to require a permit for disturbance of 50 cubic yards or more of material as stated in the Statement of Need and Reasonableness (SONAR). Page 4. Rule F. Wetland Alterations: Wetland alterations — RCWD drafting Resource Management Plan (RMP) specifically fir Lino Lakes. The requirements do not apply to Lino Lakes as it will have its own rule that will override this document. Ms. Taillon stated that RCWD does not have buffer requirements in this document but the RMP will address this issue. Ms. Taillon stated that Lino Lakes is creating a Storm Water Management Ordinance. Ms. Bor stated that the document should include stream buffers. Comment of preserving perched water stated Asleson. Add comment that a response time should be included from Board. Ms. Taillon stated the City's roadway maintenance projects are done by mill and overlay or complete removal and replacement of bituminous surface to full depth inside existing curb line. This is the biggest item between RCWD and the City. Mr. Studenski stated RCWD believes if you remove a road completely the City now has the ability to put in ponds, storm sewer, etc. RCWD does not make a differentiation between the two. Mr. Studenski stated if the City goes in and performs maintenance work on the roadway; we don't want to have to buy easements, areas to put in ponds, storm sewer, etc. If the City is reconstructing the entire street, yes we could make changes. Mr. Studenski stated for maintenance work this is a very large undertaking. Ms. Bor stated if we have to go through this process it would be more difficult to fix roadways. RCWD's definition of mill and overlay is too narrow of a definition. B. Main Street Village Concept Plan — Azure Properties — PUD Mr. Asleson stated he would not be presenting his staff report as this project is incomplete at this time. There are numerous mitigation statements in the developer's report that need to be addressed as with any development within our AUAR. Ms. O'Dea stated this project is incomplete without this data. Mr. Asleson stated there has been a good amount of discussion regarding structural BMPs. He also stated there is nothing unique on this site. The trees were cut down long ago. Ms. Brouillet commented that unless this project is complete it 3 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JULY 25, 2007 should not be presented to the board. Mr. Asleson stated that there are many unanswered questions on this project. Mr. Tom Schutte from Azure Properties addressed the board. His proposal is to develop property in the AUAR area of Lino Lakes. He has submitted documentation to Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) several times to address wetlands issues on the site. He explained how the driveway had been proposed south of the bank to miss the wetland area. He stated the RCWD liked the idea and MNDOT stated there needed to be more of a separation. Ms. Bor asked if Mr. Schutte has attended any of the AUAR meetings. He stated that he had attended all of them. He stated Mr. Smyser listed his application is lacking geotechnical information and therefore incomplete. He stated Mr. Smyser did not state he was lacking information because of AUAR information and water infiltration. Mr. Asleson stated we should not go any further as we need to address the missing information as it pertains to the AUAR issues. Mr. Asleson stated this information is mandatory. Mr. Asleson discussed how much water is allowed to leave this site. Mr. Asleson stated that there is a certain amount of water that runs off the site now. Then you have development with impervious ground that will create more runoff. Ms. Bor stated the property drains directly into the RCWD. She stated the information we need is simply not in the report. Ms. O'Dea stated the board is not saying we don't want this project, what the board wants is the frame work from the AUAR. Ms. Brouillet suggested Mr. Schutte's engineers should come in to the City and meet with Mr. Asleson and Mr. Studenski, City Engineer. Ms. Bor personally apologized to Mr. Schutte as he stated he did not know the Environmental Board existed. Mr. Schutte and Mr. Asleson discussed where Piezometers are located throughout the city. The Environmental Board recommends that this project should go no further until documentation addressing mitigation statements of the AUAR have been submitted to the City. Motion by Mr. Brown seconded by Ms. DeHaven. Motion carried unanimously. C. Blue Heron Days Parade — Ms. Brouillet will check with Sara Norman, former Board member, to see if she has the banner from last year for the parade. D. Updates — Mr. Asleson presented updates on the Blue Heron colonies and local feeding Osprey. 7. ADJOURN 4 DRAFT MINUTES • • • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JULY 25, 2007 • It was noted that the next meeting of the Environmental Board will be on August 29, 2007. There being no further business, Mr. Brown moved to adjourn at 8:25 p.m. Ms. DeHaven seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Lisa Hogstad Community Development Secretary • • 5 DRAFT MINUTES • Agenda Item 5A • • Environmental Board Meeting Date: August 29, 2007 Staff Originator: Verne Jacobsen, TKDA Topic: Water Emergency and Conservation Plan Background: Public water suppliers that service more than 1,000 people are required to have a Water Emergency and Conservation Plan approved by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) (Minnesota Statutes 103G.291). These plans were first required in 1996 and must be updated every ten years. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has prepared a schedule for each public water supplier, with a due date for the City of Lino Lakes of October 15, 2007. The plan must address supply and demand reduction measures and allocation priorities and must identify alternative sources of water for use in an emergency. The current Water Emergency and Conservation Plan was created by TKDA in 1997 and revised in 2004 to meet the requirements of a federal mandate of the USEPA, under the Homeland Security Act. That federal mandate required the City of Lino Lakes to prepare a Water System Vulnerability Assessment and amend and update the Water Emergency and Conservation Plan with the purpose of evaluating the existing security of the water system. Attached is a draft copy of the Water Emergency and Conservation Plan dated August 22, 2007. Analysis: The Water Emergency and Conservation Plan submittal to the DNR requires the City to establish conservation goals for the benchmarks listed below. DNR permit approvals will be based on meeting the specified benchmarks. If water demands exceed Benchmarks for unaccounted water, residential per capita, and peak demands then permit approval will be contingent on implementation of one or all the listed Conservation Goals until the benchmark is achieved. Conservation Goals The City's unaccounted water falls below the recommended 10% unaccounted water. Phase 1 1. Prepare an ordinance requiring rain sensors to be installed with all automatic sprinkler systems. 2. Provide public education to consumers regarding information on how to reduce water usage indoors and outdoors. 50% of water consumed by a household is used outdoors. The remaining 50% is used indoors and of that 75% is consumed in the bathroom. a. Water conservation section in the Lino Lakes Newsletter and at www.ci.lino- lakes.mn.us, providing tips and information on water conservation. b. Monthly or bi- monthly billing encourages conservation by providing timely information on water usage which gives customers an opportunity to make modifications in water use practices or identify and repair costly leaks. Attachments and flyers with water bills can also be used to provide information on how to use water efficiently. Phase 2 1. Consumer surveys, feedback, and contact with high volume consumers. a. Contact consumers with high volumes of usage to provide conservation tips and potential cost saving ideas. b. Prepare a household water audit kit, which gathers consumer feedback on conservation measures, allows consumers to see first hand their water use and compare it to the average. c. Analyze consumer feedback through surveys and contact to identify reasons for high per capita usage. 2. Offer incentive programs including. a. Leaking faucet repair b. Offer soil moisture meters and rain gages for monitoring of sprinkling. The per capita demand average for the last 10 years was 89.9. Demand is irrigation related as three years the demand was less than 75gpcd for residential use. Prepare a time of day lawn watering ordinances that restricts lawn watering during the daytime hours of loam to 6pm. Copy of Ordinance to follow. • • 3.4 Phase 1 1. Conduct evaluation of the Lino Lakes water rate structure. 2. Revise water rate structure to encourage conservation. 3. Prepare a time of day lawn watering ordinance that restricts lawn watering during the midday hours of 10am to 6pm. The conservation goals listed above are a compilation of TKDA recommendations and other Metro Area municipality's success in achieving the DNR Benchmarks. Recommendation: We are requesting direction and input from the environmental board on the proposed Conservation Goals for the City. • • • • beAFr DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - DIVISION OF WATERS and METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WATER EMERGENCY AND CONSERVATION PLANS These guidelines are divided into four parts. The first three parts, Water Supply System Description and Evaluation, Emergency Response Procedures and Water Conservation Planning apply statewide. Part W, relates to comprehensive plan requirements that apply only to communities in the Seven - County Twin Cities Metropolitan Area.. If you have questions regarding water emergency and conservation plans, please call (651) 259 -5703 or (651) 259 -5647 or e-mail your question to wateruse.state.mn.us. Metro Communities can also direct questions to the Metropolitan Council at watersupplv@metc.state.mn.us or (651) 602 -1066. PNR Water. ApPr on Permit :2 mber4) 19856168 .`, Mine. o# wafer Supplier City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Tim- I- illesheim Utility Supervisor (651) 464-5567 ivlal Address.': PART L WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION The first step in any water supply analysis is to assess the current status of demand and supplies. Information in Part I, can be used in the development of Emergency Response Procedures and Conservation Plans. A. ANALYSIS OF WATER DEMAND. IIl a , a s 1 c _ 1 f o r l li c p a s t years waterOeimiiid. If your customer categories: are different than the ones listed Table, I;: please note the changes, below., Irrigation accounts are listed rather than wholesale deliveries. 1 TABLE 1 Historic Water Demand = 1 9 I a 12 g N coo t- OO, 'O DO N —O N-- OO, DOO `C C5 .�-. NC P I Lan N CA —O U a, +Z q a a a�enMt-eOOO+NN Ss ate = - u to t� oo N- NC ••--+ o0 ••-r 0o V') N NO Cr, b 00 VI 00 ,-+ CA 00 I-. - sr-45 E Q q IONNNr)4ehetehe XAE. t• •--1 00 ON t— N v) O O .--■ •-. O ON N 00 en et -en O, C> ...y1—N---'NN-o0 f s ElNOo00o000, .a E ° .CO— O O O r-. O 1.43 O eels .r NO ,.r NO v) .r 2': �' v IN p t.-- et) N en oo C O •-+ ON N ON re; N en Tvt1i1 • itei Pumped — (MG) 242.7 292.1 294.5 >a NOt- et i N. etn 357.7 523.0 \ e*iert� v) 'd a NO Tot l W '.Bold (M�) • • aer�0,0, t.:t`:t:0VS en N •--1 t-- en N en O et 354.8 517.9 C> c5 et 475.3 •e ;:. d9 C erO,000O�o*oOep 1..4 -oo m..41 nN - 21.2 ? L..= e'..1' -^ •g 3 - 47.7 ••-- en O, O .0- eel ,--r 0 0 N 35.8 38.0* 43,0 45.4 r1 en neu G) den r Water Sold I 209.8 255.4 209.2 316.0 352.2 300.0* 448.9 O cenn 396.4 461.2 is n.e flair - -s e e 2237 2476 2665 2922 3175 3378 3580 3971 3825 4112 . Mlllinn (lalln. s 3 am 7,538 8,362 9,000 WI d- et •"' •.4 NO r,..,.., O, ° - -en e Total • Population 0 0 0 OOv)OetOsookt>121-1 v'eOet01Cnt�Nt-- et- v) v'i 0 0 0 0 0 0 NI v) .6 t` oD — ..-4 a. t— oo ON O, ON O, ON ON O •-. N- en eh- v) NO O O O, O O O O I 4, 0 L 3 e >+ e E E 3 Os O 0 es l 0 a I u 0 V E 5 o o F O m 3 a a, C = 3 w . g 0. c. .o 0 a d a . 17 7 2 = 0 ._ —= b ° a g E of .n .6 •1 at = E V 9 FE 1 a u Z - d -6 -z., E 1 2 -0 = 3 '> se a d o .00 a woe E IV o u c 0 0 3= w to C 2 3 0 'U o` •o a. s m o o a m a : 0 o = m5 = w . = m a a o ° o OS 8 0 = y. 0 "01 a 8 y 2 9 0 E = o 0 8 e o g 8 E. 0 m o a aE .ffi ,0 oo O O >, ` O 8 08 0 sr o 0 0 = s t et .0 m 0 € =-2 o a. V o a. .5 o as o m °a' �e 4p. 14 ea 45 C a C `o o a ° _ TS 0 as iii x n. 3 y V • = O..= i a nr • y 1. et O C • V 0 3 -a E 2- a a E 0 .0 z: V c. a 4) 0 4) O. .5 0 0 • • a O 4) m 0 a A a •v 0 E 3 e E 2 0 0 m es es s u 0 0 E 0 `o w 00i 8 a_ U s _ °> "' 0 ors 0 'S 0 0 0 vs 0 E, Iii 0 a 'g o. 0 m 3 3 1s.. _ '0 0 'S a. 3 .2 0 0 3 S o 0 — I 1213 0 R -e o 8 a a U V 0 a a 0 C CO e Ts = G9 a — 3 H0 a o m > 12b a, C rn x m a = oas m o n. ' o a a o H mo 5 0 8 mo "7 S a t OD b 0 = `o o 2 3 I .0 o e '$ S A e • t a s = 0 3 U m e p 6. 3 a a = 0 o = o °m = Ts C9 C a C — S. O a w z; to sij i T. a _•a 2 U • • beAFT Water Use Trends. Discuss factors that influence trends in water demand (i.e. growth, weather, conservation). If appropriaft, include a discussion of other factors that affect daily water use, such as use by non- resident commidea employees or large water coasming industry. During the recent 10 year period, the population served by the water system increased by 88 percent and represents approximately 6,650 additional people. The Metropolitan Council forecast for the City indicates that the City will have approximately 26,250 people and 9,000 households by the year 2020 All of the additional households and people are expected to be served by the water system. As current City residents are expected to connect to the water system, it is estimated that approximately 25,000 people will be served by the year 2020. TABLE 2 Lame Volume Users - List the top 10 lamest users. Customer ... Gallons per year° : = .% oftotal annual use - - Prison 13,373,000 2.43 ISD No. 12 3,149,000 0.57 AD Graphics 2,967,000 054 Target 2,545,000 0.46 Fastbreak 2,400,000 0.44 Bobby and Steven 1,977,000 036 Metro Survey 1,834,000 0.33 Forgerty Investments 1,776,000 0.32 Schawns 1,297,000 024 McDonalds 1,033,000 _ 0.18 B. TREATMENT AND STORAGE CAPACITY. TABLE 3(A) Water Treatment Water Trent :Plant: Cape Gallons per day : Describe the treatment process; : ie softening, - chlorination fluoridation, .FefM removal, reverse osmosis, coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, Others). Also, describe the annual amount.; and method of disposal of treatmentiesiduals, if anjr. City provides chlorination and fluoridation at each well. They also use polyphosphate to sequester iron and manganese at each well. TABLE 3(B) Storage Capacity - List all storage structures and capacities. Total Storage Capacity Average Day Demand. (averageof last S years) 2,000,000 Gallons 1,326,000 Gallons per day of Structure Numberof Structures Elevated Storage 2 2,000,000 Ground Storage None None 3 C. WATER SOURCES. List all groundwater, surface water and interconnections that supply water to the system. Add or delete lines to the tables as needed. TABLE 4(A. Total Water Source Capacity for System (excluding emergency connections Total Capacity of Sources _ . 4,550 Gallons per minute Thin Capacity (largestpump out of service) ` 3,050 Gallons per minute TABLE 4(B) Groundwater Sources - Copies of water well records and well maintenance information should be included with the public water supplier's copy of the plan in Attachment A. Additional Well information can be found in Appendix B. w e n # Or name'. . - Unique Well Number::::. • . : :. Well DePth LW} . ' :. * W e i* Diameter fm). Capacity . "(GPM) - - Geobgic Unit :. • Status . . 1 240171 1971 306/152 20 700 Jordan Active 2 110471 1986 258/162 24 600 Jordan Active 3 559373 1995 283/118 20 1500 Jordan Active 4 554207 1995 338/204 20 750 Jordan Active 5 722629 2005 273/165 24 1000 Jordan Active Status: Active use, Emergency, Standby, Seasonal, Peak use, etc. Geologic Unit Name of formation(s), which supplies water to the well TABLE 4© Surface Water Sources GPM - Gallons per Minnie - Resource name. Capacity (GPM/MGD None TABLE 4 (D) Wholesale or Retail Interconnections - List interconnections with neighboring hers that are used to supply water on a regular basis either wholesale or retail. Water- SnpiplySystem : :.:Capacity - (GPM/MGM' - - Wholesale: or;ret 1- Lino Lakes to Hugo 13 MGY Wholesale (2006) Blaine to Lino Lakes 20 MGY - Wholesale (2006) Hugo - 2 1400 GPM Centerville TABLE 4(E) Emergency Interconnections - List interconnections with neighboring suppliers or private sources that can be used to supply water on an emergency or occasional basis. Suppliers that serve less than 3,300 people can leave this section blank, but must provide this information in Section II C. Water Suppler System . Capacity _(GPM/MGD) .:. Whohmde or retail . .: Circle Pines 800 GPM Emergency Blame 800 GPM Emergency Emergency Hugo - 2 1400 GPM Centerville 1400 GPM Emergency Emergency Shoreview 1400 GPM 4 • • D. DEMAND PROJECTIONS. TABLE 5 Ten Year Demand Projections ..�.._.: opaiaiiou ; - : ed': -: Mirage' Day:. 'Demand (MGM) ' - , . Whiximom:'. . DagDemsod - -4M®} P ojcc ed _ - -Demsad: 2007 15,018 1.49 4.86 542.7 2008 15,850 1.57 4.74 572.7 2009 16,682 1.65 4.79 602.8 2010 17,514 1.76 4.76 632.9 2011 18,346 1.82 4.73 662.9 2012 19,178 1.90 4.94 693.0 2013 20,010 1.98 5.15 723.1 2014 20.842 2.06 536 753.1 2015 21,674 2.15 5.59 783.2 2016 22,506 2.23 5.80 8133 MGD - Million Gallons per Day MGY - Million Gallons per Year Assume 260 households per year x 3.2 people = 832 people per year. Assume the total gallons/capita/day of 99 gallon - recent 10 year average which remains unchanged from prior 10 year average. Maximum day demand projected at 2.6 x average day after 2010. E. RESOURCE SUSTAINABILITY Sustainable water use: use of water to provide for the needs of society, now and in the future, without unacceptable social, economic, or environmental consequences. Monitoring. Records of water levels should be maintained for all production wells and source water reservoirs/basins Water level readings should be taken monthly for a production well or observation well that is l pEesentative of the wells completed in each water source formation. If water levels are not currently measured each year, a monitoring plan that includes a schedule for water lever readings must be submitted as Attachment A. TABLE 6 Monitoring Wells - List all wells being measured. (Proposed Monitoring) Type of well (production, observation) Method a►f Masurement:(steel tape; SCADA etc.) . 240171 Production Monthly Tape 110471 Production Monthly Tape 559378 Production Monthly Tape 554207 Production Monthly Tape 722629 Production Monthly Tape 5 Water Level Data: Summarize water level data including seasonal and long-term-trends for each ground and/or surface water source. If water levels are-not measured and recorded one-routine -- basis then provide the: static _water.level -(SWL) when the well was constructed and a current -waterleVeriheisurement for ear hproduction well. Also mchide all wad level data-taken during -well .and:putp: . Static water levels and pumping water levels remain unchanged in the production wells over time. Attachment A: Provide monitoring data (graph or table) for as many years as possible. Ground Water Level Monitoring — DNR Waters in conjunction with federal and local units of government maintain and measure approximately 750 observation wells around the state. Ground water level data are available online www_d� state nn us�watecs Information is also available by contacting the Ground Water Level Monitoring Manager, DNR Waters, 500 Lafayette Read, St. Paul, MN 55155-4032 or call (65I) 259 -5700. Natural gesoaite impacts: ?**Cate any pal resource features 'such as calcareous •fens,:: -wetlands; trout streams, avers or su a wa :basins tl at are or could be influenced municipal on wells. •� ��esouume pro' t of th old bave`been.establ . -Miligii4itarraeastries*anantigerrientp laps nave i e n de lop ,: There are no known natural resources which are being affected by the water supply wells. adequacy -c tlie.Fesqunae toaustahi current. Describeanyinodeitng conducted. to=determriee Impacts ofproje From review of the monitoring information, the wells are sustainable and will continue to be the source of water supply for the City. : Source Waiter Proteciioa Plans. with thecontmgi nc9'- Weilhea l l taen (WHP)'Plan The in this laa-are, tond 1 �ions-regsr ed in 0 Minnesota went c e iiiidj-;§1iifit6e Water Protection (SWP) Plan: . s (MDH) ID number 1020023 - Completed by MDH o ` i .Platt° iiapl `::. 2015 Dale fi liiil- T paste: - SWP isa _'- ` ` `; '; . ; ❑ In Process Fli Completed ❑ Not Applicable 6 • • • • F. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) Adequate' of Water Supply System. Are water supply installations, treatment facilities and distribution systems adequate to sustain-current and projected demands? C] Yes 0,No If no, :describe any potential: capital improvements over the next ten years and state the reasons for the proposed- changes. CIP Attachment :-(B) The current water supply wells, treatments and storage will require additions during the next ten year period. (See CIP Attachment B) Proposed Water Sources: Does your current .CIP .include the addition of new *tilt or intakes? Yes 0-No If yes list 'the: the: ,intinber of new installa ions and projected water demands from ;each fc the:next ten yew Plans for new production' wells-mustlnclude the; geologic .source forination,well lobo and: . ... P�Po p��.capacity .. .::. .. .: , sed: - The City's current OP for the next 10 years include wells, storage facilities, and a water treatment plant. Well locations are shown on water system plan. (See Attachment B) ;Water Source . lternative 'If water so s=ure solaces that were considered. and_any posiiitliti e-s of jolt for development of supplies: .: `` ; The conjunctive use of surface and groundwater is not feasible for Lino Lakes as there are no rivers within the City limits. Standards for using surface water for municipal water supply would require a complex water treatment plant to meet the regulations. There are no alternative sources to ground water available for use by the City. : preventativeMamtenanc Ae* pre ** ativeprograms..sad:measares•w.11 help-zediuce the f emergency _'s�tuattons.�:Identify sections of the s3? t* tit are .' to fall due.to age s inateaalsor other probleans. °.3 is.info onshould'be_ used to prioritize capital improvements, motive made, and to determine thelypes of iiiaterialt (pipes, valves, coup`l�pps, etc.) to have in stock to reduce repa time. The City has an annual well inspection on all production wells and provides system maintenance as required to keep system at full operating capacity as required to meet the water demands. PART II. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCECURES Water emergencies can occur as a result of vandaiicm, sabotage, accidental contamination, mechanical problems, power failures, drought, flooding, and other natural disasters. The purpose of emergency planning is to develop emergency response procedures and to identify actions needed to improve emergency preparedness. In the case of a municipality, these procedures should be in support of, and part of, an all - hazard emergency operations plan. If your community already has written procedures dealing with water emergencies we recommend that you use these guidelines to review and update existing procedures and water supply protection measures. Federal Emergency Response Plan Section 1433(b) of the Safe Drinking Water Act as amended by the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (Public Law 107 -188, Title W — Drinking Water Security and Safety) requires community water suppliers serving over 3,300 people to prepare an Emergency Response Plan. Community water suppliers that have completed the Federal Emergency Response Plan and submitted the required certification to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have satisfied Part II, Sections A, B, and C of these guidelines and need only provide the information below regarding the emergency response plan and source water protection plan and complete Sections D (Allocation and Demand Reduction Procedures), and E (Enforcement). Provide the following infommation regarding your completed Federal Emergency Response Plan: Eaierge�nicy:Respq�nse 'aaa` Contact Person .:C' a ct Number Ems: Risillifizie. Lead _: ::.:. ° ; Tim flillesheim (651) 982 -2452 nitee;EnseLead , Rick Del:, '„ - (651) 982 -2440 Eme +cy`Respon : 'lai Cerlificalion.D to Operational Contingency Plan. An operational contingency plan that describes measures to be taken for water supply mainline breaks and other common system failures as well as routine maintenance is recommended for all utilities. Check here / if the utility has an operational contingency plan. At a minimum a contact list for contractors and supplies should be included in a water emergency telephone list. Communities that have completed Federal Emergency Response Plans should skip to Section D. 8 • • • EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURES A. Emergency Telephone List. A telephone list of emergency contacts must be included as Attachment to the plan (complete template or use your own list). The list should include key utility and community personnel, contacts in adjacent communities, and appropriate local, state and federal emergency contacts. Please be sure to verify and update the contacts on the emergency telephone list on a regular basis (once each year recommended). In the case of a municipality, this information should be contained in a notification and warning standard operating procedure maintained by the warning point for that community. Responsibilities and services for each contact should be defined. B. Current Water Sources and Service Area. Quick access to concise and detailed information on water sources, water treatment, and the distribution system may be needed in an emergency. System operation, water well and maintenance records should be Maintained in a central secured location so that the records are accessible for emergency purposes and preventative maintenance. A detailed map of the system showing the treatment plants, water sources, storage facilities, supply lines, interconnections, and other information that would be useful in an emergency should also be readily available Check here ❑ if these records and maps exist and staff can access the documents in the event of an emergency. C. Procedure for Augmenting Water Supplies. List all available sources of water that can be used to augment or replace existing sources in an emergency. In the case of a municipality, this information should be contained in a notification and warning standard operating procedure maintained by the warning point for that community. Copies of cooperative agreements should be maintained with your copy of the plan and include in Attachment . Be sure to include information on any physical or chemical problems that may limit interconnections to other sources of water. Approvals from the MN Department of Health are required for interconnections and reuse of water. TABLE 7 (A) Public Water Supply Systems —List interconnections with other public water supply that can supply water in an emergency. Water:Suppl Bye m.`a.... :_tapacity;(GPM/MGD) ' Note any limitations on ruse_ Circle Pines Blaine 800 GPM 800 GPM Emergency use Hugo 1400 GPM Emergency use Centerville Shoreview 1400 GPM 800 GPM Emergency use GPM — Gallons per Mimmft MGD — Million Gallons per Day TABLE 7 B) - Private Water Sources — List other sources of water available in an emergency. Name Capacitty= fGPIMM/MGD)' Note aby As on use Minnesota Correctional Facility 800 Emergency use GPM — Gallons per Minute MGD — Million Gallons per Day -9 D. Allocation and Demand Reduction Procedures. The plan must include procedures to address gradual decreases in water supply as well as emergencies and the sudden loss of water due to line breaks, power failures, sabotage, etc. During periods of limited water supplies public water suppliers are required to allocate water based on the priorities established in Minnesota Statutes 1030.261. Water Use Priorities (Minnesota Statutes 1030.261) First Priority. Domestic water supply, excluding industrial and commercial uses of municipal water supply, and use for power production that meets contingency requirements NOTE: Domestic use is defined (MN Rules 6115.0630, Subp. 9), as use for general household purposes for human needs such as cooking, cleaning, drinking, washing, and waste disposal, and uses for on-farm livestock watering excluding commercial livestock operations which use more than 10,000 gallons per day or one million gallons per year. Second Priority. Water uses involving consumption of less than 10,000 gallons per day. Third Priority. Agricultural irrigation and processing of agricultural products. Fourth Priority. Power production in excess of the use provided for in the contingency plan under first priority. Fifth Priority. Uses, other than agricultural irrigation, processing of agricultural products, and power production. Sixth Priority. Non-essential uses. These uses are defined by Minnesota Statutes 103G291 as lawn sprinkling. vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation, and other non-essential uses. List the statutory water use priorities alcmg with any local priorities (hospitals, nursing homes, etc.) in Table 8. Water used for human needs at hospitals, nursing homes and similar types of facilities should be designated as a high priority to be maintained in an emergency. Local allocation priorities will need to address water used for human needs at other types of facilities such as hotels, office buildings, and manufacturing plants. The volume of water and other types of water uses at these facilities must be carefully considered. After reviewing the data, common sense should dictate local allocation priorities to protect domestic requirements over certain types of economic needs. In Table 8, list the priority ranking, average day demand and demand reduction potential for each customer category (modify customer categories if necessary). Table 8 Water Use Priorities 7- filer categOry I 1 AVerage D,iry Demand—. 4gP.D>i: • 1,260,000 Deinan4-1te.ductiiiit Potettial 150,000 Institutional comniercith 160,300 0 - • Whoiesale _ 82,700 82,700 lion-eiserifig 6 TOTALS. 1,503,000 482,700 GPD — Gallons per Day 10 • • • • • Demand Reduction Potential. The demand reduction potential for residential use will typically be the base demand during the winter months when water use for dal uses such as lawn watering do not occur. The cfrfference between summer and winter demands typically defines the demand reduction that can be achieved by eliminating non al uses In extreme emergency situations lower priority water uses must be restricted or eliminated to protect first priority domestic water requirements. Shorter demand reduction potential should be based on average day demands for customer categories within each priority class. Triggers for Allocation and Demand Reduction Actions. Triggering levels must be defined for implementing emergency responses, including supply augmentation, demand reduction, and water allocation. Examples of triggers include: water demand >100% of storage, water level in well(s) below a certain elevation, treatment capacity reduced 10% etc. Each trigger should have a quantifiable indicator and actions can have multiple stages such as mild, moderate and severe responses. Check each trigger below that is used for implementing emergency responses and for each trigger indicate the actions to be taken at various levels or stages of severity in Table 9. ❑❑❑❑ ® ®® Water Demand Treatment Capacity Storage Capacity Groundwater Levels Surface Water Flows or Levels Pump, Booster Station or Well Out of Service Governor's Executive Order — Critical Water Deficiency (required by statute) Water Main Break - Loss of Production Security Breach Contamination Other (list in Table 9) Table 9 Demand Reduction Procedures ondition Trigging) .. Actions . - ,..- - tage : =_:: : " =. May 15th to September 15 Alternate day (odd/even) sprinkling restriction sprinkling restriction 10:00 am to 6:00 pm voderate) * May 15th to September 15 Alternate day (odd/even) sprinkling restriction sprinkling restriction 10:00 am to 6:00 pm Stage' 3 ; ; Severe) ' . ". Peak use exceeds total well supply capacity. Water storage unable to recover within 24 hours Total ban on lawn watering and other non - essential uses. Critical Water 13efieienck - . 4391) : Executive Order by Governor & as provided in above triggers Stage 1: Restrict lawn watering, vehicle wishing, golf course and park irrigation and other nonessential uses Stage 2: Suspend lawn watering, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation and other nonessential uses Note: The potential for water availability problems daring the on of a drought are almost impossible to predict. Significant increases in demand should be balanced with preventative measures to conserve supplies in the event of prolonged drought conditions. 90:00 AM to 6.:00 PM Ordinance to limit sprinkling to follow. 11 • Notification Procedures. List methods that will be used to inform customers regarding conservation requests, water use restrictions, and suspensions. Customers should be aware of emergency procechaes and responses That they may need to. implement Public service announcements, City web page, postings, newspaper E. Enforcement Minnesota Statutes require public water supply authorities to adopt and enforce water conservation restrictions during periods of critical water shortages. Public Water Supply Appropriation During Deficiency. Minnesota Statutes 103G.291, Subdivision 1. Declaration and conservation (a) If the governor determines and declares by executive order that there is a critical water deficiency, public water supply authorities appropriating water must adopt and enforce water conservation restrictions within their jurisdiction that are consistent with rules adopted by the commissioner. (b) The restrictions must limit lawn sprinkling, vehicle washing golf course and park irrigation, and other nonessential uses, and have appropriate penalties for Must to comply with the restrictions. An ordinance that has been adopted or a draft ordinance that can be quickly adopted to comply with the critical water deficiency declaration must be included in the plan (include with other ordinances in Attachment 7 for Part III, Item 4). Enforcement responsibilities and penalties for non - compliance should be addressed in the critical water deficiency ordinance. Sample regulations are available at www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters Authority to Implement Water Emergency Responses. Emergency responses could be delayed if city council or utility board actions are required. Standing authority for utility or city managers to implement water restrictions can improve response times for cleating with emergencies. Who has authority to implement water use restrictions in an emergency? ❑ Utility Manager ❑ City Manager ❑ City Council or Utility Board ►1 Other (describe): Public Works Director me>cgrancy Prepatnas.'if ip- do not liave q ta.. g iniple nenGw tee emergenoyaes oases, lease,i cafe any late tibnsao dale ahat on Alm tid i te' :any oil ;measures tl�'are daeing.timsidered to reduce delays :for implementing 12 • PART III. WATER CONSERVATION PLAN Water conservation programs are intended to reduce demand for water, improve the efficiency in use and reduce losses and waste of water. Long-term conservation measures that improve overall water use efficiencies can help reduce the need for short-term conservation measures. Water conservation is an important part of water resource management and can also help utility managers satisfy the ever-increasing demands being placed on water resources. Minnesota Statutes 103G.291, requires public water suppliers to implement demand reduction measures before seeking approvals to constmct new wells or increases in authorized volumes of water. Minnesota Rules 6115.0770, require water users to employ the best available means and practices to promote the efficient use of water. Conservation programs can be cost effective when compared to the generally higher costs of developing new somnes of supply or expanding water and/or wastewater Vestment plant capacities. A. Conservation Goals. The following section establishes goals for various measures of water demand. The programs necessary to achieve the goals will be described in the following section. IieoinfedWiter :e yearieragek. With — front Tab 1: „ Voimne tinaecotinfed: 'Axickepeitient unicecninteiti. , . r'n 11,780,000 gallons 2.4 percent AWWArecomnieiids 4:0146:0- gitr-.0011014.1:)Ociribe gpa)sica unaccoUt&d witer if the average of the last 5rears exceeds _ --1004L;. The City's unaccounted water falls below the recommended 10% unaccounted water. 13 re ' the for ' -5 ' Viaii. ' Siam :Table 13 j86 GPCD .... _ _0...g.T41--'' -elltg- *Ili 894f cifiti-MetniPerlitan Area was 75 OPCI)---; -.Dasonl,e goals to recluceresideadial. demand ' the: average for the lst 5 years exceeds 75 GPO]).- Phase 1 1. Prepare an ordinance requiring rain sensors to be installed with all automatic sprinkler systems. 2. Provide public education to consumers regarding information on how to reduce water usage indoors and outdoors. 50% of water consumed by a household is used outdoors. The remaining 50% is used indoors and of that 75% is consumed in the bathroom. a. Water conservation section in the Lino Lakes Newsletter and at www.cilino-lakes.mmus, providing tips and information on water conservation. b. Monthly or hi-monthly billing encourages conservation by providing timely information on water usage which gives customers an opportunity to make modifications in water use practices or identify and repair costly leaks. Attachments and flyers with water bills can also be used to provide information on how to use water efficiently. Phase 2 1. Consumer surveys, feedback, and contact with high volume consumers. a. Contact consumers with high volumes of usage to provide conservation tips and potential cost saving ideas. b. Prepare a household water audit kit, which gathers consumer feedback on conservation 13 measures, allows consumers to see first hand their water use and compare it to the average. c. Analyze consumer feedback through surveys and contact to identify reasons for high per capita usage. 2. Offer incentive programs including. a. Leaking faucet repair b. Offer soil moisture meters and rain gages for monitoring of sprinkling. :pDeman Fro* Table 1, is the ttpticl civefall . the past iOjatIJ increasing otI ecrsiiig? If total is increasing, " describe *11* lower overall per-capita : • The per capita demand average for the last 10 years was 899. Demand is irrigation related as three years the demand was less than 75gpcd for residential use. Prepare a time of day lawn watering ordinances that restricts lawn watering during the daytime hours of 10am to 6pm. Copy of Ordinance to follow. :.Viiiilepenniiida (cal4itte!_tiVerike ritti6Abi: ' i're: ' - ' ' sfrciniTtibiel) -.--s. -t.‘• .:-.., - :.Y._..?::.- Atiftitgeniatinitiiii7iii-kteeraiji ' rafio ,: -;---`-, ,' ---:,i7 i 34 Number of Metered ' C if peak dernari& eiceeda;fatiikif27:6;:deseir136 the goals for •-lottiebiagieitkileinandi3- , i•• •.',- .1: = Phase 1 1. Conduct evaluation of the Lino Lakes water rate structure. 2. Revise water rate structure to encourage conservation. 3. Prepare a time of day lawn watering ordinance that restricts lawn watering during the midday hours of 10am to 6pm. 4,184 B. Water Conservation Programs. Describe all short-term conservation measures that are available for use in an emergency and long-term measures to improve water use efficiencies for each of the six conservation program elements listed below. Short-term demand reduction measures must be included in the emergency response procedures and must be in support of and part of; a community all-hazard emergency operation plan. 1. Metering. The American Water Works Association (AWWA) recommends that every water utility meter all water taken into its system and all water distributed from its system at its customer's point of service. An effective metering program relies upon periodic performance testing, repair, repair and maintenance of all meters. AWWA also recommends that utilities conduct regular water audits to ensure accountability. Complete Table 10 (A) regarding the number and maintenance of customer meters. TABLE 10 A Customer Meters - - . . of Nuni6er- ' Connections :- Number of Metered ' C Meter tesfing - schedule - _ (learsAs Ayentge eter- - ' replacement schedule (Years) - , 4,184 4,184 As Need) ed Replaced at 1,000,000 gallons Institutional 19 19 Replaced at 10-,000.000 14 • • Thimetered Systems. Provide -an: estjnuaite of the cast to instal.- meters and:the:piojected:water, savings from meting water use Also indicate any plans. to install meters.- Fully metered system TABLE 10 (B Water Source Meters ; _ = lininh of .Meters . Meter testing' : chedu1e (yews) :> gallons Commercial 59 59 5 Replaced at 10,000,000 gallons Industrial 25 25 Replaced at 10,000,000 gallons Public Facilities ' With institutional onal -Other 1ri4 Lion - 19 19 Replaced at 1,000,000- 10,000,000 gallons TOTALS...:::: Thimetered Systems. Provide -an: estjnuaite of the cast to instal.- meters and:the:piojected:water, savings from meting water use Also indicate any plans. to install meters.- Fully metered system TABLE 10 (B Water Source Meters ; _ = lininh of .Meters . Meter testing' : chedu1e (yews) :> Average: schedule ( der replaceme .. a s)` Water Source t ) = ' 5 5 As required 15 2. Unaccounted Water. Water audits are intended to identify, quantify, and verify water and revenue losses. The volume of unaccounted-for water should be evaluated each billing cycle. The AWWA recommends a goal of ten percent or less for unaccounted -for water. Water audit procedures are available from the AWWA and MN Rural Water Association. Frequency of water audits. ❑ each billing cycle ® yearly ® other: Conducted when a leak is suspected but not apparent. Leak detection and survey: Devery year [] every other year ® periodic as needed Year last leak detection survey completed: Partial survey in 2006 Reducing Unaccounted Water: List potential sources d efforts. taken to reduce mae ou .water:: cxo�mted`water exceeds 10% of total wit]idrawals .include the ' timeframefor completii g work ta reduce' unaccounted water-to 10'io'.o 3. Conservation Water Rates. Plans must include the current rate structure for all customers and provide information on any proposed rate changes. Discuss the basis for current price levels and rates, including cost of service data, and the impact current rates have on conservation. Billing Frequency: ❑ Monthly ❑ Bimonthly ❑ Other (describe): Volume included in base rate or service charge: Conservation Rate Structures Increasing block rate: rate per unit increases as water use increases ❑ Seasonal rate: higher rates in summer to reduce peak demands ❑ Service charge or base fee that does not include a water volume ® QIY Conservation Neutral Rate Structure ❑ Uniform rate: rate per unit is the same regardless of volume Non - conserving Rate Structures ❑ Service charge or base fee that includes a large volume of water ❑ Declining block rate: rate per unit decreases as water use increases ❑ Flat rate: one fee regardless of how much water is used (=metered) Other (describe): Water Rates Evaluated: 2] every year ❑ every years El no schedule Date of last rate change- February 2006 16 • • • • • • Declining block (the more water used, the cheaper the rate) and flat (one fee for an unlimited volume of water) rates should be phased out and replaced with conservation rates. Incorporating a seasonal rate structure and the benefits of a monthly billing cycle should also be considered along with the development of an emergency rate structure that could be quickly implemented to encourage conservation in an emergency. Current Water Rates. Include a copy of the actual rate structure in Attachment ar:list- water rates :including base/service fees and volume .Charges below. 0- 30,000 gallons - $1.77 per 1000 gallons Over 30,000 gallons - $2.07 per 1000 gallons Proposed water rate schedule to follow 4. Regulation. Plans should include regulations for short-term reductions in demand and long -term improvements in water efficiencies. Sample regulations are available from DNR Waters. Copies of adopted regulations or proposed restrictions should be included in Attachment D of the plan. Indicate any of the items below that are required by local • regulations and also indicate if the requirement is applied each year or just in emergencies. Time of Day: no watering between 10:00 am and 6:00 pm (reduces evaporation) ❑ year around ® seasonal ❑ emergency only Odd /Even: (helps reduce peak demand) ❑ year around ® seasonal ❑ emergency only ❑ Water waste prohibited (no runoff from irrigation systems) Describe ordinance: ❑ Limitations on turf areas for landscaping (reduces high water use turf areas) Describe ordinance: ❑ Sod preparation (such as 4" -6" of organic soil on new turf areas with sandy soil) Describe ordinance: ❑ Tree ratios (plant one tree for every square feet to reduce turf evapotranspiration) Describe ordinance: ❑ Prohibit irrigation of medians or areas less than 8 feet wide Describe ordinance: ❑ Permit required to fill swimming pool ❑ every year ❑ emergency only ❑ Other (describe): A sprinkler ban is currently in the works. ►A 17 State and Federal Regulations (mandated) • ® Rainfall sensors on loThrincape irrigation systems. Minnesota Statute 103G.298 requires "All automatically operated landscape irrigation sysmms shall have wed and installed to lmology that inhibits or interrupts operation of the iaadscepe irrigation system during periods of sufficient moisture. The technology must be adjustable either by the end user or the professional practitioner of landscape irrigation services." ® Water Efficient Plumbing Fixtures. The 1992 Federal Energy Policy Act estabiishM manufacturing standards for water efficient plumbing fixtures, including toilets, urinals, faucets, and aerators. _Enforcement Are ordinances enforced? E Yes- .,If yes, indiceile.bow ordinances aie enforced along with -airy penalties. for non - compliance: • • 18 • • • 5. Education and Information Programs. Customers should be provided information on how to improve water use efficiencies a minimum of two times per year. Information should be provided at appropriate times to address peak cleroRntis Emergency notices and educational matErials on how to reduce water use should be available for quick distribution during an emergency. If any of the methods listed in the table below are used to provide water conservation tips, indicate the number of times that information is provided each year and attach a list of education efforts used for the last three years. Current Education Programs Times/Year Billing inserts or tips printed on the actual bill Consumer Confidence Reports 1 Local news papers Community news letters 1 Direct mailings (water anditfretrofit kits, showerheads, brochures) Information at utility and public buildings Public Service Announcements Cable TV Programs Demonstration projects (landscaping or plumbing) K -12 Education programs (Project Wet, Drinking Water Institute) School presentations Events (children's water festivals, environmental fairs) Community education Water Week promotions Information provided to groups that tour the water facilities Website (include address: http l /ciiino- lakes.mn.us) X Targeted efforts (large volume users, users with large increases) Notices of ordinances (include tips with notices) Emergency conservation notices (recommended) Other: Street Signs Continuous List education efforts for the last three years in Attachment C of the plan. Be sure to indicate whether educational efforts are on -going and which efforts were initiated as an emergency or drought management effort. Proposed Education Programs. Descc Ite any additional .efforts planned to'prrovide .conservation information to customers a.minimum of twice per year (required if there are no:-current'efforts).. - • See Page 13 A pack of conservation tips and won can be obtained by contacting DNR Waters or the Mmnesota Rural Water Association (MRWA). The American Water Works Association (AW WA) www.awwa.org or www.water wiser.ore also has excellent materials on water conservation vation that are available in a number of formats. You can contact the MRWA 800!367- 6792, the AWWA bookstore 8001926 -7337 or DNR Waters 651/259-5703 for infornatin regarding educational materials and formats that are available. 19 • 6. Retrofitting Programs. Education and incentive programs aimed at replacing inefficient plumbing fixtures and appliances can help reduce per capita water use as well as energy costs. It is recommended that communities develop a long -term plan to retrofit public buildings with water efficient plumbing fixtures and that the benefits of retrofitting be included in public education programs. You may also want to contact local electric or gas suppliers to see if they are interested in developing a showerhead distribution program for customers in your service area. A study by the AWWA Research Foundation (Residential End Uses of Water, 1999) found that the average indoor water use for a non-conserving home is 693 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). The average indoor water use in a conserving home is 452 gpcd and most of the decrease in water use is related to water efficient plumbing fixtures and appliances that can reduce water, sewer and energy costs. In Minnesota, certain electric and gas providers are required (2vfmnesota Statute 216E241) to fund programs that will conserve energy resources and some utilities have distributed water efficient showerhe ads to customers to help reduce energy demands required to supply hot water. Retrofitting Programs : Describe any .education or incentive progranas,to engage tli `' retroftting :of inefficient-plumb ng tures (toilets, s howerheads,'faucets, and aerators) or ..: appfian esfwast ing machines): None - Service area is primarily new homes. Plan ApprovaL Water Emergency and Conservation Plans must be approved by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) every ten years. Please submit plans for approval to the following address: DNR Waters Water Permit Programs Supervisor 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 -4032 or Submit electronically to waterase@dnr.state.mn.us. Adoption of Plan. All DNR plan approvals are contingent on the formal adoption of the plan by the city council or utility board. Please submit a certificate of adoption (example available) or other acfion adopting the plan. 20 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PART IV. ITEMS FOR METROPOLITAN AREA PUBLIC SUPPLIERS Minnesota Statute 473.859 requires water supply plans to be completed for all local units of government in the seven- county Metropolitan Area as part of the local comprehensive planning process. Much of the required information is contained in Parts III of these guidelines. However, the following additional information is necessary to make the water supply plans consistent with the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act upon which local comprehensive plans are based. Communities should use the information collected in the development of their plans to evaluate whether or not their water supplies are being developed consistent with the Council's Water Resources Management Policy Plan. Policies Provide a„...tateMentkOon, tlie: nciples that wilt dictate operation oftl a water-slimly. ` for exam ple It isAhe policy: if the city to provide good . a en.:affor -rah, vie assuring tihis use° does not° Have a. long- tcenegative� resource:impacL ".. It is the policy of the City of Lino Lakes Water Utility to provide potable water to all customers within the water service area defined by City Council resolution. Sufficient quantities of potable water to meet consumption and fire flow requirements shall be supplied. All water supplied shall conform to requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act and other State and Federal regulations pertaining to water system operation. Impact on the Local Comprehensive Plan. -Identify `the the adoption of tlns -water :suPPl3' plan has on the rest of the local comprehensive plan, incT3i ng mplic lions for future growth of the community, economic on. the Comm unit and c ges to the comprehensive plan that Mix result .. r The water supply plan provided within the document should not change or affect the current City comprehensive plan. Demand Projections Year :- :::. -...- - - : "i'otxl - -Comm nni9 Population -. POP' _= =T =: - l e e Dear :? = a4� a ri Uny - I3ema ..` - = Prfljected :' <l emend 2010 21,500 17,514 1.73 4.76 632.9 2020 26,500 23,000 2.28 593 832.2 2030 31,000 29,000 2.87 7.46 1047.6 'Ultimate 43,000 42,000 4.16 10.82 1518.4 -Populaiion.projections should be consistent with thoseini ie. Metropph n- Councti'.s 2030 Regional Development Framework or the Comm n ties 2008`Comp ve F ( update. If to `. within other communities, not complete service community etc:) ..:: - _ Not all residents are connected to the City water system. Maximum day (languid projected at 2.6 x average day after 2010. 21 PLAN SUBMITTAL AND REVIEW OF THE PLAN The plan be reviewed by the Council according to the sequence outlined in Minnesota Statutes 473.175. Prior to submittal to the Council, the plan must be submitted to adjacent governmental units for a 60-day review period. Following submittal, The Council determines Reviews Coordinator Metropolitan Council 230E 5th Street, St. Paul, MN 55101 electronically to: watersapply@metc.state.mn.us 22 • • ATTACHMENT A: WELL MONITORING INFORMATION • Well l Monitoring of Wells Well #1 Blue data is from our annual well inspeccons performed by McCarty well Date Static (ft) 11110/71 8' 2' 12120182 12' 05(06/83 11' 0822/85 122' 08/23/93 11' 09/15/93 10' Pumping Level (f! 21'2' 52' 25'5' 31'5' 31' 23' raw Down (I Measured By 13' Keys Well Drillers 40' McCarthy Well Co. 14' 6' McCarthy Well Co. 19' 3' McCarthy Well Co. 20' City 13' McCarthy Well Co. Jan 1994 12' 31' 19' Mar 1994 12' 30' 18' April 1904 10' 30' 20' May 1994 10' 32' 22' June 1994 12' 31' 19' July 1994 18' 32' 16 Aug 1994 14' 34' 20' Sept 1994 11' 24' 13' Oct 1994 11' 30' 19' Dec 1994 12' 30' 18' 09(19(95 7' 20' 6' 13' 6' Jan 1995 11' 31.5' 20.5' Feb 1995 11.5' 31.5' 20' 03/01/95 11.5' 32' 20.5' - 04105195 11' 27' 16' 05/02/95 11' 28' 17' 05/31/95 11' 32' 21' July 1995 11' 31.5' 20.5' Aug 1995 17' 33' 16' 09115!95 12' BY 8' Oct 1995 11' 28' 17' Nov 1995 12' 27' 16' Dec 1995 8' 27' 19' Jan 1996 0' 28' . 19' City Feb 1996 11' 27' 18' City Mar 1995 11' 24' 13' City April 1996 10' 27' 17' City May 1996 10' 28' 18' City June 1996 10' 28' 18' City Judy 1996 11.5' Not recorded slot recordecCity Aug 1996 Not recorded 31' slot recordecCity Sept 1996 11' 27' 16' City 10/17/96 13' 22' 9' McCarthy Well Co. Nov 1995 13' 33' 10' City Dec 1996 9' 27' 18' City Feb 1997 9' 27' 18' City Mar 1997 8' 23' 15' City Apra 1997 11' 27' 16' City May 1997 8' 28' 20' City City City City City City City City City City City McCarthy Well Co. City City City City City City City City City City City City Page 1 Reason Drilling of Well Annual Well Inspection Annual Well inspection Annual Well inspection Monthly Measurement Annual Well Inspection Monthly Meastnernet Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Annual Well inspection Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Morally Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measuremerht Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement MonthlyMeashremet bMeasurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Mereuaement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Annual Well inspection Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement • June 1997 13' July 1997 12 Aug 1997 111 Sept 1997 10' Oct 1997 9' 10/23/97 1D' Nov 1997 8' Dec 1997 7.5' 24' Jan 1998 8' Feb 1998 8.5' Mar 1998 8' April 1998 7' May 1998 10' June 1998 10' July 1998 7.5' Aug 1998 12' Sept 1998 10' Oct 1998 11' Nov 1998 10' Dec 1998 9.5' Jan 1999 8.5' Feb 1999 L5' Mar 1999 8' AprIl1999 8' May 1999 9.5' Jane 1999 10' 06109/99 21' July 1999 9.5' Aug 1999 11' Sept 1999 105 Oct 1999 11' Nov 1999 10' Dec 1999 12 Jan 2000 10' Feb 2000 8.5' War 2000 8' AprI2000 8.5' 05/11/00 10.5' .hate 2000 103 July 2000 103 Aug 2000 13' Sept2000 135 03126101 Nat recorded June 2001 Not recorded July 2001 Not recorded 09//9101 14' 02118103 11' 02/19/04 Not recorded 02/01/05 Not recorded Feb 2005 11' 30' 30' 31' 28' 27' 25' 28' 27' 34' 25' 28' 275 23' 30' 29' 28.5' Weil 1 17' City 18' City 20' City 18' City 18' City 15' McCarthy Well Co. 18' City 19.5' City 10' McCarthy Well Co. 17' Clay 19.5' City 19.5' City 18' City 20' City 19' City 21' City 32' 20' City 31' 21' City 323 21.5' City 303 205 City 27' 17.5' City Not recorded slot recorder City 30.5' 22' City Not recorded slot recordecCity 3D' 22' City 29' 19.5' City 28' 185 City 31' 10' McCarthy Well Co. 29' 18.5' City 32' 21' City 31' 203 City Not recorded slot recordecCity Not recorded slat recorder City 30' 18' City 28' 18' City 27' 183 City Not recorded Vot recordec City 29' 20.5' City 32' 21.5' McCarthy Well Ca. 32' 213 City 323 22' City 36.5' 23.5' City Not recorded Vot recorder City Not recorded slot recorder McCarthy Well Co. 29' slot recorder City 35' . Vot recorder cCity 45.4' 31.4' EH Renner 30' 19' McCarthy Well Co. Not recorded %ot redder McCarthy Well Co. Not recanted Niot maniac McCarthy Well Co. Not recorded slot recorder City Page 2 Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Annual Well .Inspection Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Annual Well Inspection Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement t Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measuement Madill), Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measrtemert Monthly Measuremerd Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Annual Well Inspection Mordhly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement y Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Annual Well Inspection Monthly Measrsement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Annual Well inspection Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Pump repiacement/VFD Annual Well Inspection Annual Well Inspection Annual Well Inspection Monthly Measurement Weil l 02122106 12' 25' 13' McCarthy Well Cc. Annual Well Inspection 02121107 Nat recorded Not recorded ded slot necordecMcCarthy Well Co. Annual Well Inspection Monitoring of Wells We II a Date 1W19/88 O1/D6/93 021U2F93 Awl 1993 May 1993 June 1993 Aug 1993 09M 5/93 18' Dec 1993 18' Mar 1994 18' April 1994 17' 05131/94 20' Aug 1994 22' Sept 1994 17.5' Jan 1995 18' Feb 1995 21' Mar 1995 19.5' 03/01/95 19.75' 03/02/95 18.75' 18' April 1995 18' May 1995 18' June 1995 18' July 1995 21' Aug 1995 21' Sept 1995 23' Oct 1995 19' Nov 1995 20' Nov 1995 21' Dec 1995 17' 091(19/95 17' Jan 1996 17' Feb 1996 18' Mar 1996 17' April 1996 17' May 1996 17' June 1996 195 July 1996 23' Aug 1996 28' Sept 1996 26' Oct 1996 21' 10/17/96 22' Nov 1996 21' Dec 1996 17' Jan 1997 20' Feb 1997 17.5' Well 2 Blue data is Iron, our annual well inspections Pumping Static (ft) Level (ft) Draw Down (ft) Measured By 9' 33' 24' 20' Not recorded Not recorded City 20' Not recorded Not recorded City 20' Not recorded Not recorded City 20' 31' 11' City Not recorded 31' Not recorded City Not recorded 30' Not recorded City 29' 11' McCarthy Well Co 32' 14' City 26' 10' City 30' 13' City 33' 13' City Not recorded Not recorded City 26.5' 9' City 30.5' 12.5' City 32 11' City 31' 11.5' City 31' 1125' City Not recorded Not recorded City 28' 10' City 28' 10' City 30' 12' City 30' 12' City 33' 12' City 34' 13' City 32' 9' City 30' 11' City 32' 12' City 27' 6' City 28' 11' City 24.5' 6.5' McCarthy Well Co. 27.5' 10' City Not recorded Not recorded City 28' 11' City 29' 12' City 28' 11' City 33' 13.5' City 35' 12 City 38' 12' City 37' 11' City 31' 10' Cfty 31' 9' McCarthy Well Co. 31' 10' City Not recorded Not recorded City 29' 9' City 29' 11.5' City Page 1 performed by McCarthy well r Reason Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement . Annual Wel inspection Mowry Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measur'emert Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measuremert Mordhly Measurement Monthly Measurement remext Mouthy Mart Monthly Mnert Mme' Measurement - Annual Web Gaon Morritly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Mord* Measurement Mont* Measurement Monthly Measurement Mord* Measurement Monthly Measurement Annual Wel hwpecton Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Mar 1997 17.5' Apr1 1997 16 May 1997 17' June1997 25' July 1997 22 Aug 1997 21' Sept 1997 19' Oct 1997 20' 10(23197 20' Nov 1997 18' Dec 1997 18' Jan 1998 18' Feb 1998 17.5' Mar 1998 17.5' April 1998 17' May 1998 21' June 1998 20.5' July 1998 19' Aug 1998 23' Sept 1998 21.5 09122/98 31' Oct 1998 20.5' Nov 1998 19' Dec 1998 18.5' Jan 1999 17.5' Feb 1999 18' Mar 1999 18' April 1999 17.5' May 1999 20' June 1999 21' OW09199 21' July 1999 24' Aug 1999 22 Oct 1999 19' Nov 1.999 20' Dec 1999 18.5' Feb 2000 18' April 2000 19.5' May 2000 22.5' 05/11/00 25' Not recorded 29' 29' 34' 33' 30' 30' 30' 29' 28' 26' 28' 28' 263 31' 303 325 31' 37' 33' 38' Not recorded 27.5' Not recorded Not recorded 30' 30' 28' 31' 30.5' 32 34' 33' 323 325 31' 30' Not recorded 32 32 0326101 Not recorded Nat recorded 0524101 20.5' 29.5' 09/19/01 9' 42 0211803 21' 32 02/19104 Not recorded Not recorded 02101/05 21' 33' 02/22106 18' 28' 02/21/07 18' 28' Well 2 Not recorded City 13' City 12' City 9' City 11' City 9' City 11' (may 10' City 9' McCarthy Well Co. 10' City 8' City 10' City 10.5' City 9' City 14' City 9.5 City 12 City 12' City 14' City 11.5' City T McCarthy Well Co. Not recorded City 8.5' City Not recorded City Not recorded City 12' City 12 City 10.5 City 11' City 9.5' City 11' McCarthy Well Co. 10' City 11' City 13.5' City 125 City 12.5' City 12 City Not recorded City 9.5' City T McCarthy Well Co. Not recorded McCarthy Well Co. 9' EH Ramer 33' EH Renner 11' McCarthy Well Co. Not recorded McCarthy Well Co. 12 McCarthy Well Co. 8' McCarthy Well Ca 105 McCarthy Well Co. Page 2 Monthly Measurement Mouthy Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Mthly Measurement Mouthy Measurement Monthly Measurement Annual Well inspection Monthly Measureruert Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measuremert Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measuramert Monthly Measurement Annual Well inspection Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Mont ly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measusernet Monthly Measuremert Monthly Measurement Amaral Well inspection Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Mordhly Measurement Monti* Measurement Annual Well Inspection Annual Well Inspection Well Inspection Pump repioce anVwD first Annual Well inn Annual Well Inspection Annual Well Inspection Annual Well inspection Annual Well inspection • Monitoring of Wells Well #3 Date Shiba (ft) 10117!96 18' Oct 1996 18' Dec 1996 13' Jan 1997 12 Feb 1997 13' Mar 1997 12 April 1997 14' May 1997 12.5' June 1997 15 July 1997 13' Aug 1997 13' Sept 1997 13' Oct 1997 13' 10/23/97 15' Nov 1997 13' Dec 1997 13' Jan 1998 12.5' Feb 1998 13' Mar 1998 11.5' April 1998 11' May 1998 12.5' June 1998 13.5' July 1998 13' Aug 1998 14' Sept 1998 14' 09/22198 20' Oct 1998 17' Nov 1998 14' Dec 1998 12' Jan 1999 12 Feb 1999 12' Mar 1999 12.5' April 1999 12' May 1999 13' June 1999 12' 0809/99 16' July 1999 125 Aug 1999 18' Sept 1999 14' Oct 1999 13' Nov1999 13' Dec 1999 125' Jan 2000 14' Feb 2000 13' April 2000 12' May 2000 14' Blue data is Pumping Level (i9 22' 22 18' 18' 19' 19' 16' 19' 25' Not recorded 20' 27 19' 21' Not recorded 20.5' 20' 20' 19.5' 19' Not recorded 20' 24' 21' 21' 23' 21' 19' 19.5' Not recorded 22.5' Nat recorded Not recorded 195 19.5' 21' 22' 235 225 20.5' Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded 21' Well 3 from our annual well Inspections performed by McCarthy we Draw Down (fp Measured By 4' McCarthy Well Co 4' City 5' City 8' City 6' City T City 2' City 6.5' City 10' City Not recorded City City 7' • City e' City 8' McCarthy Wefi Co. Not recorded City 7.5' City 7.5' City T City 8' City B' City Not recorded City 6.5' City 11 City 7' City T City 3' McCarthy Weil Co. 4' City 5' City 7' Cfty Not recorded City 10.5' City Not recorded City Not recorded City 6.5' City 7.5' City 5' McCarthy Wet Ca 95 City 7.5 City 8.5' City 7.5' City **recorded City Nat recorded City Not recorded City Not recorded City Not recorded City T City Page 1 Reason . Annual Well inspection Monthly Measurement Morally Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measuremert Annual Well iron Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Mort* Measurement Mord* Meeau mmert Annual Well kapecton Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Annual Well inspection Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Mord* Measurement Montt y Measurement . Monthly Measurement Monthly Meamrernert Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Mouthy Measurement 05t11/00 18' 21' July 2000 17' 21.5' Aug 2x00 18' 24' Sept 2000 17' 23.5' Oct 2000 15.5' 23.5' Nov 2000 14' 21' Feb 2001 17.5' Not recorded 03126101 Nat recorded Not recorded May 2001 10.5 19.5' July 2001 17.5' 25' Aug 2001 17.5' 23' Sept 2001 Not recorded 24.5' Jan 2002 18' 22.5' Feb 2002 12.5' 225 0212502 12' 20' June 2002 Not recorded 18.5' 02/18/03 13' 19.5' Aug 2003 Not recorded 30' 02/19/04 Not recorded Not recorded 02/01/05 Not recorded Not recorded 02122/06 16' 21' 02/21/07 18' 23' Wel 3 4.5' 6.5' 7' 7' Not recorded Not recorded 0' 75' 5.5' Not recorded 10' 8' Not recorded 6.5' Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded 5' 5' Page 2 McCarthy Well Co. City City City Cky cy City McCarthy Web Co. City City Cky City City City McCarthy Weft Co. McCarthy Well Co. City McCarthy Weep Co. McCarthy Wel Co. McCarthy Wel Ca. McCarthy Well Co. Annual Well Inspection Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Mordtly Measurement Annual Wefl inspection Monlity Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measurement Monthly Measuemer Monthly Measurement Annual Wefl Inspection Monthly Measurement Annual Well Inspection Monthly Measurement Annual Well inspection Annual Wel Inspeclion Annual Weil iron Annual Well Inspection • Well 4 Monitoring of Wells well #4 Blue data is from our annual wean inspections performed by McCarty well C Pumping Static 00 Level (ft) Draw Down (ft) Measured By Reason IT 54' 3T Keys Well Drilling MDH Well Record New Wells 20' 51' 31' IT 46' 29' EH Renner 19' 38' IT McCarthy Well Co. 18' dal recorder Not recorded City 18' 45' 27' McCarthy Well Co. 135' 150' 15' McCarthy Well Ca 19' 35' 18' McCarthy Well Co. 35' 50' 15' McCarthy Well Co. Not recorded dot recorder Not recorded McCarthy Well Co. Date 11/09/95 1995 04/15196 10117/95 Feb 1997 10/7.197 09/T?J98 06/49/99 05/11/00 03/28101 02125/02 02/18/03 02/19/04 02/D1/05 02/2?J05 02/21/07 • • 22' 20' 35' 24' 20' 23' 38' 14' 34' 48' 3T 38' 40' 14' 13' 13' 18' 17' McCarthy Well Co. McCarthy Wei Co. McCarthy Well Co. McCarthy Well Co. McCarthy Well Co. McCarthy Well Co. Page 1 Pump Instal Annual Well Inspection Monthly Measurement Annual Well inspection Annual Well inspection Annual Well inspection Annual Well Inspection Annual Well iron Annual Well inspection Annual Well inspection Annual Well inspection Annual Well inspection Annual Well Inspection Annual Well inspection Well 5 Monitoring of Wells Well #5 Blue data is from our annual well inspections peafarmed by McCart The only monitoring reports are in the well log Proposed Plan Monthly measurement of all production wells by tape. • • • • ATTACHMENT B: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN • DRAFT 8-17-07 XIY. FUTURE CAPITAL PROGRAM TABLE 10 Item No. Description Year Cost 1 Construction of Well No. 6 and Pumphouse No. 6 with water main 2008 - 2009 $800,000 2 Strengthen Trunk Watermain (Phase 1) 2008 $750,000 3 Construction of a 1.5 MG Ground Storage Tank, Booster Station, and Well No. 7 2010 - 2012 $3,000,000 Storage 1.5 million gallons $1,050,000 Booster Station $1,500,000 Well No. 7 $450,000 Optional Alternate Storage 2.0 million gallons $1,250,000 _' 4 Complete Raw Water Mains from Wells No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 5, and No. 6 to reservoirs including revision to well pumps 2012 $1,425,000 5 Strengthen Trunk Water Main (_Phase 2 2011 $790,000 6 Strengthen Trunk Water Main (Phase 3) 2015 $175,000 7 Construction of Treatment Plant 20t7 $9,050,000 8 Strengthen Trunk Water Main (Phase 4) 2020 + $570,000 9 Improve Distribution Water Main - Southwest Corner (Phase 5) 2025 + $1,200,000 - 10 Construction of Well No. 8 with Pumphouse $800,000 2029 + $1,800,000 - Includmg Raw Water Main for Wells No. 4, No 8, and No. 9 $1,000,000 11 Construction Well No. 9 with Pumphouse and Raw Water Main 2035 $800,000 are m zwr sonars Water Treatment -Plant Study 29 13843.000 • • • ATTACHMENT C: EDUCATION INFORMATION PROGRAMS • mou ioJ puB S OIV poppos 'moos f Aimou zoj suojdooxo ova OAHU, Pe" gnu L1 1 c o 0 n F m o O O • - m rt p = p e4 C p p O d m is pp C O Ga. p O m g a "� C 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 4al3 s upIu,.Ia (CayWUJ ZnuopvN ueoA govo S i 2oquaogdos oa S I icon ont}ooija Si uop(nn 1700Z UT uvq o poppluj se t outZmo AND ocj, FIRST - CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID Mee a lines, WI Pernik Na 33 • • • • • • ,Sprinkling Ordinance In Effect This Summer The City of Lino Lakes has always taken pride in its efforts to conserve our precious natural resources. In past years, the city has had the luxury of being able to meet the peak water coon demands of residents without imposing formal restrictions. Odd/even and night time watering has been merely _- The dry conditions we experienced last summer, however, put an extreme burden on our water supply. Ptak water demand exceeded production, while overnight demand allowed water tower levels to only slightly recover. This much water use can potentially compromise our public safety and fire protection der. The Insurance Services Organization recommends that our system be capable of a sustained Saw of 3,500 gallons per minute for a four-hour duration. The ability of our system to meet this criterion while also supplying peak household demand is doubtful. The average consumption fir Lino Lakes in the winter months of 2003 was approximately 650 ,000 gallons per day. During August 2003, consumption peaked to more than four million gallons in a single day, which is attributed to watering lawns and other nondomestic uses. For these reasons, the city is in the process of adopting an ordinance related to water use. • From May 15 through September 15 odd number property addresses may water on odd - number days, and even number property addresses may water on even number days. • In the event the city administrator determines that a severe water shortage exists that could jeopardize adequate fire protection and public safety, the city administrator is authorized to further restrict the sprinkling of lawns and gardens. • Watering of new sod and new seed for the first 12 weeks is permitted. • The first violation shall result in a S25 citation and a $50 subsequent citation to those individuals who repeat violations. • This ordinance applies only to those individuals drawing water for sprinkling from the public water system. The adoption of seasonal water restrictions is a necessary and reasonable measure to control water consumption during periods of peak demand_ Also, sprinkling restrictions will delay the need for additional well houses that are costly to build and maintain. Information about the new ordinance will be placed in fixture water bills and the local newspaper. Plans are also underway to place informational signage near the entrances of residential developments_ • .. •_ : the next 18 months. This citizen-driven plan outlines policies - guidelines intended m implement the citizens' 2030 Vision Plan. Cities are required to submit a COMpreheliain Plan to the Metropolitan Council every 10 years. See Page 3 tOr•the latest information. and visit the city website at ..i4ivotti1ino-lakes.mn.us for continuous updates. • • Citizens undertake long-term plan SP* LIGHT ON The 2030 Comprehensive Plan update will be ongoing over . Imo Lakes volunteers monitor aquatic invertebrates in Hardwood Creek within the Rice Creek Distgict as part of a Stream Health &ultra- tiott Program (SHE". These volunteers received training in &Airfield and lab work to provide valuable data that regulatory agencies can use to appraise water quality. Road Construction Ahead See Page 8 for d,-tailc 44, t-AKEs•.co City is award finalist for Green Development Minnesota Environmental Initiative atonally honors. innovative projects that have achieved entmonfin#y environmental outcomes by 1-t=r1v,sing the power of partnerships. The City of Lino Lakes is a finalist in the 2007 awards competition in the category of Green Building and Development for its proactive, citizen- driven environmental review process of the I-35E Corridor. The Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) assessed the impact of development on sensitive natural resource areas and provided a mitigation plan for pro- tecting these areas, as well as documenting and Thirning for infrastructure needs and improve- ments. Other public agencies were invited into the process from the onset, making a smooth approval process with- positive results. The winners will be selected in May. Lii [IN 0 F • • • Public Services Sprinkling restrictions begin May 15 The City of Lino Lakes Sprinkling Ordinance will be in effect again this pear from May 15 through September 15. Oddnumber property addresses may water on odd - number days; and even - number property addresses may water on even number days. The adoption of seasonal. wares restrictions is a necessary and reasonable LileZigate to control water consumption dosing periods of peak demand. The ordinance applies only to those "sad' tviditals' drawing water for sprinkling from the public water system. Watering of new sod and new seed for the first 12 weeks is ?emitted. The fast violation shall result in a $25 citation and. a $50 subsequent citation to those individuals who repeat vi t:iofiL Act 's Crltirrri Oartmii4ue4, froe"rr Page 2 Han for and immpiemrai needed local regional transporta- tion improvemenu. Coat= improvements oft Lake Drive and the 1 -35W image, County Roads 49 and j, inriid; the i n:ion of traffic signals. Begin planning fear inzett=ion.:aapravements at Lake: nrive and Main Stoses, COIIesnoe planning a 11014 44 bypass connecting 37,1 and 35E, and the possibility of a four-lane highway pn 13511/ to lit junction with l- P. Prepare.an access management plan fir Birth Street Complete citizens' review of cat charter requirements rebated in road. don: Receive citizen task force report in June 200.7, take. appropriate action based on recominendarions contained in the report which may be 1) placing a charter amendment question or 2) a specific street re nonstrucgM question on the. ballot Complete Update of city's Comprehensive Plan. Complete draft comprehensive plan, bold public forums, submit draft plan for agency reviews and adopt updated plan. Review and update city's recreation projects and priorities. Review park dedication ordinance and park dedication • needs, complete Legacy Trail segment, pursue possible East Birch Street. Trail crossing, and redevelop Lino Park. Review and =vise current plan for the developmenr of the future recreation complex located at Birch Sneer and Centerville Road. Diversify expand, and enhance the city's tax base. Under- take and complete an analysis of economic development opportunities for ezpanion of the city's tax base develop economic development marketing plan; provide for align- ment of comprehensive plan and the economic develop- ment plan. Establish an appropriate revenue won and allocation policy for the city. Increase citizen input opportunities as m how funds am allocated; review infrastructure financing policies; complete a utility rate study; and review storm water utility study. Maintain safe neighborhoods and community areas. Promote security throughout the community through community programs and citizen involvemenc adopt a crime free multi - housing ordinance adopt public safety radio system ordinance update emergency plan and conduct exercise of plan; consider task forces pertaining to gangs, drugs, violent offenders Address projected housing needs for the City of Lino Lakes. Provide life cycle/affordable housing within the commu- nity; provide land use areas in comprehensive plan with densities that make affordable housing possible evaluate incentives that will encourage the private sector to supply affordable housing; and develop - ordinances and policies to keep housing affordable, safe, and attractive. • Conservation Easement Moon Marsh THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT is made, granted and conveyed this day of 2007, by names of owners of site , (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor "): 1. xxx hereby grants and conveys onto the City of Lino Lakes a permanent non - exclusive easement for conservation purposes over, across, through and upon the following described premises ( the "Conservation Easement Area" ) situated in Anoka County, Minnesota to wit: 2. The location of the Conservation Easement Area is described as follows: An easement for conservation purposes over, under and across Outlot C, Outlot D, and Outlot E, MOON MARSH, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND Those portions of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, MOON MARSH, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying southwesterly, westerly, and northwesterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence South 01 degree 12 minutes 00 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the east line of said Lot 1, a distance of 140.07 feet; thence southwesterly, along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 220.00 feet, a central angle of 20 degrees 21 minutes 31 seconds, and length of 78.17 feet to the point of beginning of described line; thence North 66 degrees 57 minutes 14 seconds West, a distance of 127.07 feet; thence North 01 degree 12 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 242.71 feet; thence North 22 degrees 53 minutes 29 seconds East, a distance of 137.56 feet; thence North 28 degrees 36 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 89.81 feet to the northeasterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating. For purposes of this easement, there shall be no mowing, lawn chemicals, construction, disposal of yard wastes, general dumping, excavation, or development or improvements within the easement area and that the easement area shall be left in a natural state. The City of Lino Lakes or other public entity, in cooperation with the Grantor, their successors or assigns ( "Landowner "), may conduct environmental restoration and management activities within the Conservation Easement Area. Prior to such activity, the City or other public entity shall confer with and acquire the permission of the Landowner. • • • Environmental notification signs shall be placed by Landowner on each property line at the point of intersection of said property line and the Conservation Easement Area. These signs shall remain in place in perpetuity and may be replaced or changed as needed at the sole discretion of the City of Lino Lakes. The City and the Landowner shall confer to design signs that are acceptable to both parties. names of owners of site here STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2007 by names of owners of site DRAFTED BY: City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Notary Public Conservation Easement, Moon Marsh, page 2 of 2