My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/12/1999 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1999
>
04/12/1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2014 3:10:36 PM
Creation date
8/11/2014 12:15:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/12/1999
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rezoning, PDO Development Plan <br />Outlot B Apollo Business Park No. 2 <br />April 12, 1999 <br />page 4 <br />S. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the <br />property. <br />Apollo Drive (CSAH 12) is an A minor arterial and is designed to accommodate <br />industrial traffic in the area. The road and the intersection at Lake Drive are designed to <br />handle the traffic from several industrial/business parks. The change in zoning for this <br />site will not significantly alter the traffic generation of the area. <br />By agreement with Anoka County, the number of accesses to Apollo Drive is limited. <br />The agreement allows four road accesses and driveways no closer than 600 feet from each <br />other on each side of the road. The site shares a driveway access with the clinic. The <br />City Engineer is pursuing an additional driveway for this site, and the Anoka County <br />Highway Dept. has indicated willingness to trade a road access for a driveway access. <br />Staff believes that the fourth road access is not needed. <br />PDO DEVELOPMENT PLAN: COMBINED PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAN <br />This PDO differs from others in that in Lino Lakes a PDO typically is used for residential <br />development and parallels the platting process. A preliminary and final development <br />plan normally are required. Because the only reason a PDO is needed on this proposal is <br />that there will be more than one building on a lot, we are combining the preliminary and <br />final PDO development plans into one. Future subdivision of the site will need to <br />undergo a separate subdivision review process. <br />The project has been undergoing change since its beginning. The current proposal is to <br />construct buildings A and B immediately but build only the foundations for buildings C <br />and D. The applicant states that water, sewer, and storm sewer pipes and other utilities <br />must be installed for the entire site all at once. In addition, he states the parking lots for <br />the entire site must be constructed. Because of this, the foundations for all buildings must <br />be constructed now. <br />This poses the possibility of naked foundations for an unknown period of time. This <br />causes a concern because of the visual impact, especially at a location right on the <br />freeway and at the major gateway to the community. There also is the concern of how <br />the foundations alone will fare over a winter. <br />The Planning & Zoning Board was comfortable with this proposal as long as the City has <br />adequate financial guarantees to cover the cost of removing the bare foundations if they <br />are not built in a timely manner. The City can fashion guarantees to ensure the buildings <br />are completed by a specified date. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.