Laserfiche WebLink
Peregrine Pass <br />May 24, 1999 <br />page 7 <br />Impervious surface: A planned development allows for flexibility. Under the proposed <br />plan, the road pavement will not be as wide as in normal developments. This reduces the <br />amount of impervious surface, which allows more infiltration of water. <br />It also is possible to have shared driveways. This would further reduce impervious <br />surface. <br />Roads, access and safety: One lot will access 12th Ave. The other nine lots will access <br />the internal cul de sac. The roads can handle additional traffic generated by nine homes. <br />In any development, each access onto a road is a potential safety concern: more access <br />points mean increased probability of accidents. The proposed plan prevents numerous <br />driveway accesses onto 12th Ave. and Holly Drive. Eight out of nine lots will access <br />12th Ave. via a new cul de sac road. Thus, instead of nine new driveway accesses, there <br />will be one driveway access (Lot 9) and one road access. <br />Density, Lot Sizes: Gross density is 1.21 units per acre. Net density, counting only the <br />uplands, is 1.53 units per acre. The same number of lots would be possible under R -1X <br />zoning. The R1 -X minimum is 12,825 sf buildable land. All nine lots meet the R1 -X <br />minimum. <br />The greatest departure from normal zoning is in the lot widths. Minimum lot width for <br />R -1 is 80 feet, for R -1X is 90 feet. The lot widths on the revised plat are as follows: <br />All but two lots meet the R -1 width, and these come to 86% and 91% of it. Four lots are <br />less than the R -1X width, but two are over 90% of it, one is 81 %, and one is 77 %. The <br />lots increase in width farther from the road frontage. Minimum side yard setbacks are <br />met (10 ft.). The lots are arranged to allow for the environmentally friendly features <br />described above, and this justifies the widths that are less than standard zoning. <br />Minimum house footprint sizes of the R -1X zoning district will be a condition of <br />approval. <br />lot width (ft.) <br />% of R -1 (80 ft.) <br />% of R1 -X (90 ft.) <br />Lot 1 <br />145 <br />181% <br />161% <br />Lot 2 <br />83 <br />104% <br />93% <br />Lot 3 <br />88 <br />110% <br />98% <br />Lot4 <br />128 <br />160% <br />142% <br />Lot 5 <br />150 <br />188% <br />167% <br />Lot 6 <br />90 <br />113% <br />100% <br />Lot 7 <br />69 <br />86% <br />77% <br />Lot 8 <br />73 <br />91% <br />81% <br />Lot 9 <br />207 <br />259% <br />230% <br />All but two lots meet the R -1 width, and these come to 86% and 91% of it. Four lots are <br />less than the R -1X width, but two are over 90% of it, one is 81 %, and one is 77 %. The <br />lots increase in width farther from the road frontage. Minimum side yard setbacks are <br />met (10 ft.). The lots are arranged to allow for the environmentally friendly features <br />described above, and this justifies the widths that are less than standard zoning. <br />Minimum house footprint sizes of the R -1X zoning district will be a condition of <br />approval. <br />