My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/28/1999 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1999
>
06/28/1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 9:42:48 AM
Creation date
8/12/2014 10:31:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/28/1999
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes <br />Park Board Meeting <br />June 7, 1999 <br />Paul stated he does have concern regarding the City selling park <br />property. However, he added he wants to hear how the residents <br />feel about the revised plan. <br />Pat stated he is also opposed to selling park property. He noted <br />that the project is predicated on a bigger better park at <br />sometime in the future. <br />Mr. Uhde stated he does have a concept plan of the larger park. <br />The plan will be reviewed by the City Planner later this week. <br />Ms. Deb Peterson, 208 Palomino Lane, came forward an asked when <br />the $35,000 in the Park Fund will be used for a play structure in <br />the park. <br />Chair Lindy stated the play structure installation will be the <br />first priority once the ground is ready. <br />Mr. Greg Gifford, 214 Palomino Lane, came forward and stated he <br />was led to believe from the designs that there would be a park <br />there connected by a trail. Access to the park without having to <br />cross Lilac Street is very desirable. He stated he is in favor <br />of the revised plan. <br />Chair Lindy asked if the homeowners most affected by the plan are <br />happy with the revisions. The homeowners indicated they are <br />happy with the revised plan. <br />Ms. Lawrence came forward again and expressed concern regarding <br />the lack of parking. She also asked if there is funding for the <br />trail connection from Behm's 5th Addition. <br />Chair Lindy stated money is budgeted each year for trails. Every <br />year the trails are prioritized regarding completion. <br />Ms. Lawrence stated that if there is no trail connection children <br />will still have to cross Lilac Street to get to the park. <br />Rick stated without a developed park the trail connection is a <br />low priority. The trail connection would become a higher <br />priority when the park is developed. <br />Chair Lindy added that the intent of smaller parks is for the <br />park to be for the neighborhood. Large parking areas are not <br />needed in smaller parks. <br />R <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.