My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/26/1998 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1998
>
05/26/1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 12:25:33 PM
Creation date
8/19/2014 10:41:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/26/1998
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lots proposed are as follows: <br />Lot 1 is 18,422 sq. ft. in area (14,322 above the existing pond elevation) 80 x 230 <br />Lot 2 is 18,396 sq. ft. in area (18,230 above the existing pond elevation) 80 x 230 <br />Lot 3 is 18,371 sq. ft. in area, 80 x 230 <br />Lot 4 is 16,483 sq. ft. in area, 80 x 230 with a 50' rear property line <br />Lot 5 is 12,569 sq. ft. in area, 119 x 105 (deficient in lot depth by 15') <br />Lot 6 is 14,927 sq. ft. in area, 123 x 119 on the north and 148 on the south <br />NOTE: All Tots contain a 33' wide UPA Utility Easement along their southerly property line <br />Staff would suggest that Lot 6 could be reduced in width by 30 feet to allow <br />additional depth for Lot 5, however, this may hinder home construction on Lot 6 <br />due to the UPA Easement. Should the P & Z determine that the deficiency in <br />depth for Lot 5 is warranted, a Variance would be required. All other lots meet or <br />exceed the minimum requirements of the Ordinance. <br />Staff would recommend approval of this preliminary plat as we believe <br />redevelopment of these parcels would be consistent with the general character <br />of the neighborhood. The following conditions are recommended: <br />1. A grading plan be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. <br />2. Permits be obtained from the Rice Creek Watershed District if required. <br />3. A wetland delineation be prepared prior to Final Plat Approval. <br />4. A park dedication fee be submitted based on the requirements of <br />City Subdivision Ordinance. <br />5. A developers agreement be signed and financial guarantees posted as <br />recommended by the City Engineer prior to Final Plat Approval. <br />6. A determination is made as to the adequacy of depth for Lot 5. <br />REZONE: <br />The rezone request is recommended to apply to all of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Block <br />2, Arthur E. Thom Addition, and Lots 47 and 48, Block 1, Arthur E. Thom <br />Addition. The Zoning Ordinance provides as follows: <br />The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed <br />amendment. its judgment shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.