Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />19 <br />20 <br />Transportation <br />Transportation <br />Transportation <br />Transportation <br />Transportation <br />Transportation <br />pg. 6 -13 <br />PAGE 29 <br />AND FIG 6 -12 <br />P.32 <br />pg. 6 -16 & <br />Fig. 6 -5 <br />PAGE 33 <br />AND FIG 6 -14 <br />P. 34 <br />Fig. 6 -4 <br />Fig. 6 -4 <br />Fig. 6 -4 <br />FIG 6 -10 P.27 <br />8• <br />FIG 6 -13 P.32 <br />Fig. 6-4 <br />Fig 6 -10 page <br />27 <br />Anoka County would like to discuss <br />with the city the 2030 system needs <br />listed in the plan, specifically the <br />current projections for number of lanes. <br />(they suggest "four lanes will be <br />considered...") <br />Anoka County would like to discuss <br />with the city the 2030 system needs <br />listed in the plan, specifically the <br />current projections for number of lanes. <br />(they suggest "four lanes will be <br />considered...") <br />Remove symbol for "future full access <br />interchange" as no new ones are <br />shown on ma • <br />Consider showing traffic volumes in the <br />Cit of Centerville. <br />Adjust placement of 60,000 vehicles to <br />clarify for I -35E and not 20th Ave. S. <br />AND CR 84 <br />adjust placement of traffic volumes on <br />CSAH 14 through the park as <br />described in comment letter <br />SRF will discuss the system <br />improvements section with Anoka <br />County, and will revise the text to reflect <br />the 'potential' need for four lane streets. <br />The final design of all of these roadways <br />will require further study. <br />(note: will these remain rural <br />sections so the thresholds differ from <br />urban • er Table 6 -2 • a • e 21 <br />SRF will discuss the system <br />improvements section with Anoka <br />County, and will revise the text to reflect <br />the 'potential' need for four lane streets. <br />The final design of all of these roadways <br />will require further study. <br />(note: will these remain rural <br />sections so the thresholds differ from <br />urban • er Table 6 -2 'a! e 21 <br />This legend is repeated on all maps and <br />doesn't warrant a revision on only those <br />where the s mbol is unused. <br />Staff feels the current information is <br />sufficient and to • ical. <br />SRF will revise the figure to clarify the <br />volumes for the interstate and 20th <br />Avenue South. AND CR 84 <br />• AND FIX THE OVERLAY OF <br />LINES FOR 35E AND CR 84 IN <br />THIS SAME AREA UP TO CSAH <br />14 ON BOTH FIGS. 6 -10 AND 6 -13 <br />SRF will review the traffic forecast for <br />Main Street and fix accordingly <br />Anoka County confirmed they are <br />comfortable with the recommendations <br />made in the plan regarding future lane <br />needs since this is a planning -level <br />analysis; however, SRF will add text to <br />the Year 2030 System Needs (pg. 29) <br />section to note the final design of the <br />proposed roadway improvements will <br />be determined throu • h additional stud . <br />Anoka County confirmed they are <br />comfortable with the recommendations <br />made in the plan regarding future lane <br />needs since this is a planning -level <br />analysis; however, SRF will add text to <br />the Year 2030 System Needs (pg. 29) <br />section to note the final design of the <br />proposed roadway improvements will <br />be determined through additional stud . <br />No action necessary <br />No action necessary <br />SRF will revise the figures as <br />commented <br />SRF reviewed the traffic forecasts on <br />CSAH 14 through the park and found <br />the appropriate volume should be <br />15,600 (Figure 6 -10) and 10,400 <br />(Figure 6 -13). This was reviewed with <br />Anoka Count and the concurred. <br />