Laserfiche WebLink
Council Member 0' Pon n e l ( introduced the following resolution and moved its <br />adoption: <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />RESOLUTION NO. 12 -36 <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND <br />AUTHORIZING ADVERSTISEMENT FOR BIDS - 2012 SEALCOAT PROJECT <br />WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the 2012 Sealcoat Project <br />and has presented such plans and specifications to the City Council for approval; <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO <br />LAKES, MINNESOTA: <br />Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file at City Hall, are hereby approved. The <br />City Engineer is directed to advertise for bids, provide construction observation, and close out the <br />project once it is complete, and shall be paid by the hour in an amount not to exceed $12,800.00. <br />The City clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in Finance and <br />Commerce an advertisement for bids for the making of such improvement under such approved <br />plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for two weeks, shall specify the <br />work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Clerk, at which time they will be <br />• publicly opened at the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be <br />considered by the Council at 6:30 p.m. on June 11, 2012, in the Council chambers of the City Hall. <br />Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an <br />opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless <br />sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or <br />certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of suc . id. <br />• <br />Iuhe artell, Ci i Cler <br />Adoption by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of May, 2012 <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member <br />TR be sc r- and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />0( Don ne it ,"Roeser, Rci- er-fiy, 6+Des -Reinert. <br />The following voted against same: <br />hone_ <br />Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />