My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/09/1984 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1984
>
07/09/1984 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2014 1:23:13 PM
Creation date
10/10/2014 12:29:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
07/09/1984
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 9, 1984 <br />II. <br />Save as above amended, said Ordinance No. 2 shall stand as initially <br />IIIpassed and as previously amended. <br />This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its <br />passage and publication according to the City Charter. <br />Passed by the City Council this 9th day of July, 1984. <br />ATTEST: <br />7Lh <br />Edna L. Sarner, City Clerk <br />_l <br />enso , Mayor <br />Benjamin <br />CONSIDERATION OF PETITION FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ASH STREET (NORTH COUNTY <br />LINE) TO INCLUDE COST ESTIMATE <br />Mr. John Davidson told the Council he met at the corner of Ash Street <br />(North County Line and Foxtail Drive with Mayor Benson, White Bear <br />Township Board Chairman, County Engineers from Anoka and Ramsey <br />County, Don Volk, Engineer of White Bear Township and Homer Bruggeman, <br />developer relative to the condition of this particular portion of Ash <br />Street. <br />257 <br />Mr. Davidson explained the south half of the street is in Ramsey County <br />and was accepted by Ramsey County for maintenance. The north half of <br />the street is in Anoka County and has never been accepted by Anoka <br />County for maintenance and is therefore a City street. <br />This part of Ash Street is completely deteriorated because it was under <br />water part of this spring. It is his recommendation to treat this <br />problem as a maintenance project. This would be most cost effective, <br />salvage as much of the roadway as possible, raise the grade of the road, <br />install a culvert and surface it. Assuming one -half the cost would be <br />borne by Ramsey County and the last one -half to be assessed to the <br />fronting property along the north side, the cost of reconstructing the <br />present 22 foot street would be $19.21 per foot. If the street were to <br />be upgraded to City standards for a rural street of 24 feet, the cost <br />would be $21.30 per foot. He also noted that 370 feet of the 872 feet <br />to be reconstructed is public and the City would be responsible for the <br />1 cost of the 370 feet. <br />Mr. Davidson said there are alternative methods that could defer this <br />type of action. One is the part of the street presently under water <br />could be raised and blacktopped, but not improved any further. However, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.