My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/22/1985 Council Minutes (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1985
>
04/22/1985 Council Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2014 1:49:30 PM
Creation date
10/13/2014 1:28:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
04/22/1985
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />163 <br />COUNCIL MEETING <br />April 22, 1985 <br />Page Three <br />PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD REPORT - PETE KLUEGEL <br />A. Donnell Realty - Metes and Bounds Conveyance - Mr. Kluegel <br />explained that this is for a metes and bounds subdivision <br />of 76 acres currently zoned rural owned by Robert Lund- <br />gren on Holly Drive. The subdivision has a 60' right -of -way <br />that also extends to the northern boundary of the property, <br />soil analysis has been prepared, letters from the Department <br />of Natural Resources and Rice Creek Watershed District Board, <br />are part of the file, a letter from the engineer with the <br />recommended approval subject too; cash in lieu of land, Mr. <br />Davidson's alternate #2 for road alignment; brush be cleaned <br />out for line of sight access along Holly Drive; and the rec- <br />ommendation of Zack Johnson in his letter of April 5, 1985 <br />which recommends an 80' collector road rather than the in- <br />tended local street with 60' right -a -way. In addition. there <br />was a recommendation from one of the Planning Board Members <br />that the City deviate from the rural standards and ask for <br />32' width asphalt pavement in lieu of the 24' rural standard. <br />Mr. Reinert asked what reason is there to deviate from the <br />rural standard. Mr. Kluegel said the member felt the 24' width <br />was not adequate. Mr. Reinert referenced a previous work ses- <br />sion regarding rural road construction and asked if the 24' <br />width could be expanded. Mr. Davidson said he recommended <br />the 32' width gravel with top 24' blacktop so that if there <br />was storm sewer construction in the future the ditches could <br />be filled and use the 32' top. <br />Mr. Hawkins asked about the plan for constructing the roads, <br />will building permits be requested before the road is in <br />place. Mr. Kluegel explained they do not plan to build for <br />approximately two years and the road will be constructed <br />first. <br />Mr. Hawkins said he wanted to see the abstracts covering <br />this property to make sure the right parties are named be- <br />cause there is a great deal of easement dedication. He also <br />wanted to see the easement document. Normally before the <br />City accepts these easements, the City should have a developer's <br />agreement with the property owners stating when the roads will <br />be put in, and to what standards and who will pay the costs. <br />Also this agreement should state the people who own the lots <br />now put the road in and will keep the lots until the road is <br />in before marketing them. <br />Mr. Don Nelson from the audience stated it was the intent to <br />file the easements along with each filing for each parcel. <br />There will be four owners of this property and they are fully <br />aware that they cannot build any houses until there is an im- <br />proved road installed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.