My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2007-140 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2007
>
2007-140 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2014 2:08:39 PM
Creation date
10/15/2014 12:33:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Master List Resolution
Meeting Date
09/10/2007
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Resolution #
07-140
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Member Carlson moved for adoption of the following ordinance: <br />• <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />RESOLUTION NO. 07 -140 <br />RESOLUTION RECEIVING A PETITION AGAINST IMPROVEMENTS, SHENANDOAH <br />AREA. <br />WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has received a petition from residents the <br />Shenandoah Area against the reconstruction of the streets and installation of the <br />watemain in accordance with the provisions of the Lino Lakes City Charter, Section 8.04 <br />and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and <br />WHEREAS, the City proposes to terminate the Shenandoah Area Improvements <br />Project, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes <br />City Charter. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: <br />1. That a petition against the Shenandoah Area Improvements Project has been <br />received and verified. A majority of owners have signed this petition, therefore <br />per City Charter policy, Council shat of ake such improvement. <br />• <br />e Bartell, 9y Clerk <br />on, Mayor <br />Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 10th day of September, 2007. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Stoltz and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor <br />thereof: <br />Carlson, Stoltz, Reinert, O'Donnell <br />The following voted against same: <br />none (Mayor Bergeson abstained from voting) <br />Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.