08/11/1980 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

15 August 11, 1980 Mr. McLean questioned the matter of 'leasing'. Mayor Gourley asked for comment on Mr. Jaworski's. suggestions. There was some discussion on this. He also questioned number 5 on page 2. He felt this should be deleted. There was some pros and cons on this matter. Mr. Mc Lean asked how to protect the neighborhood from the animals - this brings up the matter of fencing. Mrs. Elsenpeter - in a rural area how much of the allowable land can be leased. This report designates 2Z acres in rural and rural residential and 5 acres in all other areas. Mr. McGrath explained the rationale of this thinking. Mrs. Elsenpeter asked, that undef:Section 4, Item 3, could it be indicated that these plans must be filed before the animals are brought in? It was the assumption of the Committee that this is the way this should be handled. Mr. McLean asked if the "non- conforming use" should not be included in this report and it was generally felt that it should be. On page 1, No. 5, Mr. Jaworski asked that the reference to Ordinance No. 73 be deleted. Mayor Gourley asked that the word "proposed" be eliminated from the references to the Limo Lakes Lands Use Plan, and to add to the end of the sentence where this is referenced the words, "or zonnng map ". Under Item 4, Section B, delete all wording after the word, "guidelines "; under Item 5, Section A, should refer to "this ordinance "; under sec +ion 3, add at the end per'parcel'; Section 4, Item 1, line A, include something on leasing. Under Section 4, Item 5, it was suggested all registrations be on one single date; also in this item change the word "must" to "shall "; Mayor Gourley said he would like to see the establishment of a permanent board to arbitrate all problems in this area. The Council members had no problems with this idea. There was some discussion on the duties of this permanent board and Mayor Gourley felt the details of this can be worked out at the meetings of the Commission. This report is to be returned to the Committee and the Committee will work on putting this in ordinance form. The Committee will be meeting on Wednesday evenings at 6:30 P.M. beginning August 20, 1980 . A public hearing will be scheduled on this proposed ordinance for public comment. The next item to be considered was the acceptance on the street in Bloom's Addition. Mayor Gourley asked that acceptance of this street be held until some core samples had been taken of this street. He asked that this be done in light of the problems that have been occuring with new streets in the City. Mr. Jaworski moved to held acceptance on this street until the Engineer has taken core samples of the street to insure that this street meets City specifications or the City Engineer Certifies that the street does meet City specifications and that the 20% maintenance bond be provided. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Schumacher reported on a letter that says the street in Equity Estates meets City specifications and is recommended for acceptance by the City Engineer. Mr. Schumacher felt that if the City Engineer says a street is complete and meets City specifications and it fails after a one year period, it should then be the responsibility of someone other than the City for the repair of this street. Mrs. Elsenpeter moved to authorize the City Administrator to contact an independent Engineering Firm to study this street in Equity Estates and determine if the street does meet City specifications and what caused the break up after only one year. Se- conded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously.