04/27/1987 Council Minutes (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

091 COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 27, 1987 Ilosner- Goertz, 454 Lilac Street, Building Addition to Present Building- Mr. Kluegel explained that Mr. Goertz plans to make two additions to his building and then the entire building will be rented with an option to buy by Advance Printing. The Planning and Zoning Board had recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1) the driveway surface and parking areas follow the ordinance including a durable and dustless surface in the rear forty feet south of the building and terminating at the loading dock, 2) the remainder of the back yard be seeded for grass, 3) no exterior storage be allowed on site other than parking of business vehicles. The present use of the building is by the current owner who plans to relocate. Mayor Benson asked why Mr. Joyer of the P & Z Board voted against the motion. Mr. Kluegel explained he was concerned about the requirement for a blacktop area in the rear of the building. Mr. Goertz from the audience felt this requirement could hamper future expansion of the building. Presently the area is limerock. After further discussion, Mr. Marier moved to approve the application and the recommendations of the P & Z Board. Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Site and Building Plan Review (New Building, 448 Lilac Street) - Mr. Goertz has requested a revision of the mini storage building on Lilac Street to house his construction company and for a warehouse area. He would be shutting off all of the large bay areas and bricking up the front. Mr. Bisel moved to approve application No. 87 - 08 per the P & Z Board's recommendations. Mr. Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Conditional Use Permit Request for Exterior Storage - Set Publics Hearing for May 26, 1987, 7:30 P.M. - Mr. Kluegel explained that Mr. Goertz is requesting exterior storage at the above building and this requires a conditional use permit. Mr. Marier moved to set this public hearing. Mr. Bisel seconded the motion. Mr. Goertz asked why a hearing was required. Mr. Kluegel explained that it is a requirement of the city code. Mr. Goertz said he did not have to have a hearing when his current construction office was built. Mr. Kluegel said'that was a requirement then and he was sure a hearing was held. Mr. Goertz was concerned because this would mean a delay in his building plans and he has already spent three months trying to get this approved. Mayor Benson said that his application was dated March and this is only April so that it has not taken three months to go through the City requirements. He felt the City was as expedient as possible in this case. Voting on the motion, motion carried unanimously. II PAGE 7