Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Oakwood View <br />page 4 <br />Growth Management: <br />MUSA Reserve: The comprehensive plan and the growth management policy <br />establish a specific number of MUSA reserve acres to be allocated for residential <br />growth for stage one (prior to year 2010). The site is within the existing MUSA, so no <br />MUSA reserve is required. <br />Growth Management, Units/Year: The comprehensive plan and the growth management <br />policy establish a specific number of dwelling units of residential growth for stage one <br />(prior to year 2010). The goal is 147 per year. The City Council has the flexibility to <br />exceed the limit by 20% (29 units) in a year without amending the comprehensive plan. <br />The table at the end of this report shows the status of the staging plans for final platting <br />new residential units. <br />Approvals for year 2004 have exceeded the goal by 18.4 %. An additional two units will <br />raise that to 19.7 %. This is within the allowable discretionary range. At the discretion of <br />the City Council, the duplex could be final platted in 2004. <br />However, ten more Tots would go beyond the 20% limit. Therefore, final platting of the <br />ten single family lots on the north side of the property will have to wait until 2005. In <br />other words, if this project is to proceed, it must be phased over two years. <br />Rezoning <br />The PUD zoning is intended for the southern portion of the site. The northern portion is <br />to retain its current R -1X zoning. As stated in the zoning ordinance, the City shall <br />consider possible adverse effects of the proposed zoning amendment. Its judgement <br />shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: <br />1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and <br />provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />Amending the comprehensive plan as requested would address the land use <br />issue. <br />2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the <br />area. <br />The church exists, and is surrounded by residential uses. Additional residential <br />use on the site would be compatible with the area. <br />3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein (in the <br />zoning ordinance). <br />