My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2004-116 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2004
>
2004-116 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2014 11:26:23 AM
Creation date
11/7/2014 10:22:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Master List Resolution
Meeting Date
08/09/2004
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Resolution #
04-116
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />AGENDA ITEM 6 E <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser <br />C. C. MEETING DATE: August 9, 2004 <br />TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING <br />Resolution 04 -116 Negative Declaration On The <br />Need For An Environmental Impact Statement <br />Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition <br />VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 <br />BACKGROUND <br />An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) prepared for Pheasant Hills Preserve <br />12th Addition has undergone public review. The City received public comments and staff <br />prepared a draft Record of Decision document in July, which includes responses to the <br />public comments. The Environmental Board considered the draft Record of Decision and <br />recommended a negative declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement <br />(EIS). The next step is for the City Council to make a declaration on the need for an EIS. <br />For reasons discussed in the Record of Decision document and summarized in this report, <br />staff is recommending a negative declaration: a decision that an EIS is not justified. <br />The responses to the public comments can be revised as determined by the City Council. <br />The Record of Decision, including the resolution, will be sent to all agencies on the EAW <br />distribution list and to everyone who sent in comments on the EAW. <br />The City Council discussed the question at the work session on July 21st and decided to <br />hold a public hearing. <br />As a reminder, the decision on the EAW is not an approval or denial of the development <br />project. The EAW addresses potential environmental impacts. Information in the EAW <br />should inform the decision on the project itself, but action on the project is a different <br />decision. Once the environmental review process is completed, the project application <br />itself will come to the City Council for consideration. Because of information collected <br />for the EAW, revised plans will be needed to bring the project application to the City <br />Council. <br />ANALYSIS <br />The environmental review process is laid out in MN Rules Chapter 4410. To assist in <br />considering the need for an EIS, here is a part of Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, Subpart 7, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.