My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2004-116 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2004
>
2004-116 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2014 11:26:23 AM
Creation date
11/7/2014 10:22:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Master List Resolution
Meeting Date
08/09/2004
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Resolution #
04-116
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addn. <br />page 2 <br />• which lists the criteria to be considered to determine if a project has the potential for <br />significant environmental effects —that is, if an EIS is warranted. <br />4410.1700 DECISION ON NEED FOR EIS. <br />Subpart 1. Standard for decision on need for EIS. An EIS shall be ordered for <br />projects that have the potential for significant environmental effects. <br />Subp. 7. Criteria. In deciding whether a project has the potential for significant <br />environmental effects, the following factors shall be considered: <br />A. type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects; <br />B. cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects; <br />C. the extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by <br />ongoing public regulatory authority; and <br />D. the extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and <br />controlled as a result of other available environmental studies undertaken <br />by public agencies or the project proposer, including other EISs. <br />The EAW review highlighted several issues. The main environmental issues are noise <br />and vibration from the pile driving activity during construction of the bridge, and the <br />visual impact of the bridge. <br />Noise: The noise from the pile driving will be unpleasant for nearby residents. It will be <br />temporary —the duration of the bridge construction. Construction hours will be limited <br />by a standard city requirement in all development agreements: 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. <br />Monday through Friday; 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday; no work on Sundays or <br />holidays. There likely will be dewatering pumps running beyond those hours. <br />Temporary noise walls will be required around the pumps to minimize any disturbance to <br />existing homes. <br />Vibration: As with construction noise, this is a temporary, though unpleasant impact. A <br />pre - construction survey and ongoing monitoring program, as well as additional fmancial <br />security, will be required. <br />Visual: A flat bridge design will minimize the visual impacts compared to a truss bridge. <br />The bridge will be visible: it will be about 10 feet higher than the tops of the vegetation. <br />The City will require the use of wooden railings, which will fit into the wooded <br />environment. There will be a visual impact, and it will be permanent. The impact will be <br />similar to the type and extent of changes that occur when new roads are constructed and <br />homes are built in previously undeveloped areas. However, the bridge will be more <br />visible than most roads because the top of the railings will be about ten feet above the <br />vegetation tops. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.