Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />September 20, 2004 <br />Page 4 <br />The total estimated cost of Lake Drive improvements is $2,401,521. It is proposed that several <br />sources of revenue be applied to reduce that cost. F unds from Anoka County ($7,500), Century <br />Farms ($25,500), and the Fairview Land Sale ($82,522) would all be available when needed to <br />directly reduce the estimated cost of the project and, as a result, the size of the bond issue. A <br />summary follows: <br />TABLE 5 <br />Total cost of Lake Drive <br />$2,401,521 <br />Anoka County <br />$7,500 <br />Century Farms <br />$25,500 <br />Fairview Land Sale <br />$82,522 <br />Total GO Tax Increment Bond <br />$2,285,999 <br />Pooled TIF from Panattoni is not available up -fron t, but would be pledged to pay a portion of the <br />debt service over the next 8 years as the increments are annually paid. <br />__As tax increment is_ generated -an- nua ll-y, the first priority for its- use - would -be-to -pay debt- service - -- - - - - -- <br />on these bonds. <br />B 1m • ro - u infrastructure costs <br />The total estimated cost of the improvements is $8,382,027, proposed to be reduced by other <br />revenues as shown in Table 2 to $5,382,865, which woul d be identified in the development <br />agreement as the maximum assessment amount. Improvement bonds are proposed to be <br />issued to pay $5,382,865 of infrastructure cost s, which will be assessed to the developer. <br />C) Tax increment pay-as-you-go note to developer <br />We are recommending a land write down in the am ount of $2,700,000 total, with $1,000,000 <br />provided in the form of a 16 -year pay -as- you -go note, carrying a 6% interest rate. The <br />remaining land write down is described in D below. <br />D) Internal loan to Developer — A portion to be reimbursed by Met Council Grant, if not, then <br />reimbursed with TIF <br />The developer has requested that $1,700,000 be provided near the be ginning of the project to <br />reduce out of pocket expenditures related directly to the redevelopment property. We have <br />negotiated several m easures to securitize these "up- front" dollars in the followi ng manner: <br />• It would not be paid until completion of demolition of all buildings within the <br />District, removal of the billboard, and approval of the prelim inary plat for the <br />townhome development. <br />• When it is paid, it would be put in escrow with a requirem ent that it not be <br />released until such time as the first building permit is obtained on the townhome <br />project. <br />