Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />September 20, 2004 <br />Page 6 <br />iii) That the development agreement contain a provision that a m inimum assessment <br />agreement will be required for any components of the project that wil I continue to be <br />owned by the Developer. As with any standard minimum assessment agreement, it <br />will continue in force on any components of the project owned by the Developer. <br />These agreements will provide some surety that a certain level of i ncrement will be <br />initially generated. It does not shelter the City from any changes such as to class rates, <br />or changes in the tax increment I aw or other property tax laws in general. <br />2) Assessment to developer <br />a) $5,382,865 will be assessed to the developer after construction of the infrastructure <br />improvements to the project. Should the final assessment amount be less, the total <br />assistance amount would be reduced by an equal sum. <br />3) Up -front assistance <br />a) This scenario will apply regardless whether the Metropolitan Council grant is approved. <br />The $1,700,000 "up- front" dollars will not be paid until specified benchmarks have been <br />met, and once these are met the dollars will be placed in escrow until such a time as the <br />first building permit is issued on the townhome project. The benchmarks for placing the <br />$1,700,000 in escrow are: <br />i) Acquisition, demolition, relocation of TIF properties has been com pleted <br />ii) Removal of the billboard in the TIF District <br />iii) Approval by the City Council of the preliminary plat for the townhome development <br />within the TIF District. <br />4) Priority distribution of annu al increment <br />a) The tax increment bonds will receive 1st priority for annual distribution of increment. <br />b) The remainder of annual increment will be proportionately distributed to reimburse the <br />City on its internal loan and to reimburse the developer on its pay -as -you- go note. Of <br />the remaining annual increment after debt service on bonds, the following distribution <br />would occur based on whether the M etropolitan Council grant is received: <br />TABLE 6 <br />Loan Amount <br />% of annual <br />increment <br />distribution <br />City internal loan, without Metropolitan <br />Council grant <br />$1,700,000 <br />62.96% <br />Developer pay -as- you -go -note <br />$1,000,000 <br />37.04% <br />City internal loan, with Metropolitan Council <br />grant <br />$700,000 <br />41.18% <br />Developer pay -as- you -go -note <br />$1,000,000 <br />58.82% <br />Additional Deal Points <br />It is important to note that the developer is sharing a fair am ount of the risk in this project by <br />financing approximately $7.9 million in acquisition costs and agreeing to $5,382,865 in <br />assessments. The developer has also crafted a project which will satisfy the infrastructure <br />requirements of the YMCA. The developer is estimating their costs at approximately <br />$17,000,000, which includes the following: <br />