My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/13/1991 Council Minutes (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1991
>
05/13/1991 Council Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2014 11:38:59 AM
Creation date
12/9/2014 1:26:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
05/13/1991
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
140 <br />COUNCIL MEETING <br />VOTING ON THE MOTION: <br />Bisel <br />Neal <br />Bohjanen <br />Reinert <br />Kuether <br />MAY 13, 1991 <br />Absent: none <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Resolution No. 46 - 91 can be found at the end of these minutes <br />Council Member Reinert moved to approve Resolution No. 47 - 91 <br />calling for a hearing on the PineRidge improvement. Council <br />Member Bohjanen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Resolution No. 47 - 91 can be found at the end of these minutes. <br />Council Member Neal moved to approve Resolution No. 48 - 91 <br />ordering plans and specifications for PineRidge. Council Member <br />Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />PLANNER'S REPORT, JOHN MILLER <br />Consideration of a Variance the Shoreland Management Ordinance <br />for Oak Brook Peninsula, DRB Application No. 90 - 66 - Tom Hovey, <br />Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has sent a letter to the <br />City stating that the City may wish to verify the location of <br />Otter Lake Drive as it is extended in the Oak Brook Peninsula <br />subdivision. He is asking that the City or the developer of Oak <br />Brook Peninsula show that the road will be more than 50 feet from <br />the ordinary high water (OHW) elevation. If it will not be, a <br />variance will be required. The developer has provided survey <br />information about the street location and it has been determined <br />that there is a concern. The Public Works Director has agreed to <br />allow the street to be placed to one side of the street right -of- <br />way. This will mean only about 50 feet of the entire length of <br />street will not meet the setback from the OHW line. <br />Mr. Miller explained that if a variance is not granted and the <br />developer is forced to move the street, there will be a larger <br />impact on the surrounding area than by granting a variance. He <br />noted that the street will be closer to the cranberry bog leaving <br />less natural vegetation to act as a filter and to screen the <br />street. Second, moving the street would require additional cut <br />and fill activity and removal of even more vegetation. Moving <br />the road would produce a greater environmental impact. <br />Mr. Miller noted that granting a variance requires six (6) <br />findings -of -fact. He read the findings and asked that if the <br />Council chooses to approve the variance, the six (6) findings of <br />PAGE 3 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.