Laserfiche WebLink
134 <br />May 14, 1973 <br />Mr. Zelinka read a letter from Mr. Hawkins concerning the workings of <br />the Environmental Commission. There was discussion on the context of <br />the letter with the suggestion that the EQC be given specific assignments <br />rather than having to look around for something that needs attention. <br />Mr. Bohjanen suggested having a member from the EQC, P3Z, Park Board <br />and possibly one other person to study the wet land ordinance. <br />Mr. Jaworski wondered if we wouldn't be wasting our time in working <br />on a wet lands ordinance since the watershed controls all wet lands. <br />Mr. Zelinka asked if mileage and expenses had ever been paid to members <br />of these commissions. <br />Mr. Bohjanen said, No. Mr. Locher said the could be done but we <br />would also nedd to contact our Insuarance agent since they would be on <br />Village business and would need to covered in transit. <br />Mr. Bohjanen asked the Clerk to readi-wo letters he had received from <br />Mr. L "AI lei r concerning a bi I I to limit the powers of Anoka County in <br />the taking of lands for park purposes without consent of the local <br />governing bodies. Mr. Zelinka moved to have the Clerk write to Mr. <br />John Mi Iton and Mr. Vincent Lombardi express+ng our concern and our support <br />of this bill. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried. <br />Mr. Locher reported that he had a call from Mr. George Harrison on <br />Lake Drive in reference to building a garage that would extend beyond h i s <br />house setback. Mr. Locher read the Ordinance covering this and had informed <br />Mr. Harrison that he would need a variance, and suggested that he get <br />approval of his neighbors. <br />Mr. Locher also reported on the hearings that he attended in connection <br />with the Park Bill. Mr. Locher felt that this is a bad bill and he <br />found that only people who were in favor on the bill were on the agenda <br />to speak. He also found that if you opposed the bill that it was <br />almost impossible to get copies of the bill or any of the amendments. <br />He felt that the Metro Council is aksing for more and more power and that <br />if this bill fails this session that they will be back until they do get <br />it passed. <br />Mr. Locher had looked over some insurance papers that the Clerk had <br />received in connection with Mr. Carlson's license for sewer installation <br />and the bond from U.S. Lakes in connection with plumbing installations. <br />There were some signatures needed. Mr. Jaworski moved to approve the <br />licenses with the stipulation that they only be issued when all requirements <br />are met. Seconded by Mr. Zelinka. Motion carried. <br />I n answer to a question concerning the Metro Sewer Board, Mr. Locher said <br />that Mr. Dougherty is till out of town. He also reported that he believed <br />that they wanted a specific figure from us as to our cost in hauling the <br />sewage. The Clerk had obtained some figures on the truck and passed them on <br />to Mr. Locher. I t was suggested that these figures be given to our Engineer <br />and he could use therm to compute our cost. Mr. Carley will get the necessary <br />i nfromati on from Mr. Locher and compute the cost figure for the Counci l . <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />