My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/13/1972 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1972
>
03/13/1972 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2014 4:23:55 PM
Creation date
12/18/2014 12:28:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
03/13/1972
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3/6/72 <br />the tax rolls. The assessments dbuld be paid by those benefiting directly. <br />We are premature on all this - we must think of the tax payer first. <br />The problem of knowing how, many homes will be built in the future was discussed. <br />Jandric really isn't building too fast right now and they don't let us know <br />how many potential townhouses they plan. <br />Mr. Gotwald felt that he and Mr. Locher should meet with the Sewer Board first <br />to delay the 1971 bill and part of the 1972 charges, and then come up with a <br />feasability study. Mr. Locher said he is going to draft a letter tomorrow to <br />get on the Metro's agenda. It takes some time to do this,. Also, he will <br />write Jandric and Glenn Rehbein to ascertain what their projected building <br />plans are for the next 5 to 7 years respectively. <br />After long discussion Mr. Bohjanen stated that we need a workable formula in <br />order to assess the benefited property owners and that we should settle on some <br />policy but for the time being; delay - not defer. <br />Mr. Cardinal moved to adjourn at 10 :55. Seconded by Mr. Marier. Carried <br />unanimously. <br />Minutes approved at the meeting of March 27, 1972 <br />Joan Heath, Deputy -Clerk <br />3/13/72 <br />The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes Village Council held on March 13, 1972 <br />was called to order by Mayor Bohjanen with all members present as well es <br />Attorney Locher and Engineer Gotwald. Clerk- Treasurer June Emerton took notes. <br />Mr. Jaworski moved to approve the minutes of the February 28, 1972 meeting as <br />corrected. Seconded by Mr. Cardinal. Carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Dan Heimer, member of the Board of Directors of the Northwest Saddle Club, <br />presented the Club's case for keeping the trailer home on the premises. He <br />stated that the new Board of Directors would meet the following evening to <br />make a decision on whether to build a caretaker's home or to enlarge the exist- <br />ing building to include such facilities, or some other alternative. Mr. Heimer <br />stated that having a caretaker present had eliminated the vandalism. It was <br />decided that we would give the Northwest Saddle Club two weeks to send us a <br />letter on their intentions, and if they wanted to keep the trailer to give us <br />some assurance that there would be some construction within 90 days. <br />The hearing for S. Wilson was set for 8 :15 p.m., but no one from the Riding <br />Stable was present. The Clerk noted that they had not picked up her letter from <br />the Hugo post office and it had been returned. It was decided to leave the <br />matter open during the meeting until they might arrive. <br />Wally Hill was asked to give a report on the 1971 audit. Mr. Hill noted that <br />the report gets bigger each year and that none of the Funds had ended up in the <br />red. He touched on several aspects of the report and answered questions. He <br />recommended that the Village should require the Bank Depository to give us <br />additional collateral to cover the amount of money we expect to handle during <br />the year, particularly when receiving bond sale monies; this doesn't cost either <br />the bank or us anything. Mr. Locher noted that we should perhaps insure our <br />municipal building for a larger amount than the $100,000 now in force since the <br />cost of rebuilding it would be higher. Mr. Gotwald suggested that we contact <br />V4ttsop,Construction to see how much more it would cost to build it today, and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.