Laserfiche WebLink
Mrs. Swanson asked if we had gotten a letter from the MSB on the cancellation of <br />our allocatin, and stated she wanted a copy of the thank -you letter which was <br />read at the meeting on the 19th. Clerk said she didn't have a copy in the file; <br />Mr. Bohjanen will leave a copy for the Clerk. <br />Mrs. Swanson asked the Clerk if separate card files on office and other equip- <br />ment had been started yet; Clerk Had not. Mrs. Swanson wanted this done to show <br />when equipment was bought and the money spent on its maintenance. <br />Mr. Jaworski asked Mrs. Swanson if she had gotten a calcuator to try yet; she <br />did not answer him. <br />Mrs. Swanson asked if the Clerk had gotten red tags for the Plumbing Inspector; <br />Clerk had not, but noted that Mr. West had provided his own, and she had no <br />sample. Mr. Marier suggested getting one from an adjacent area and ordering <br />150 of them. <br />Mrs. Swanson had noticed from the key list that there was only 1 key for the gas <br />pump; Clerk thought there was an extra one. Mrs. Swanson said some committee <br />chairman had keys for the building and were not listed. There was discussion, <br />with the Clerk noting the list had not been up -dated since February. Mrs. Swanson <br />asked if the part - time police had keys, and told the Clerk to bring the list <br />up to date. Clerk said she had given a complete set of keys to Mr. Myhre and <br />did not know which keys he gave to the other men. Mr. Myhre said that all the <br />police men had keys to the side doors and the police office, and that he picks <br />up the keys when a man quits. <br />Mrs. Swanson asked Mr. Jaworski if the County men had been designated yet; he <br />said he hadn't had time to do so yet. Mrs. Swanson said that was why he was <br />having problems with the ditches. Mr. Jaworski denied having ditch problems; <br />there was discussion. <br />Mrs. Swanson brought up the matter of the $500 hookup fees whch were charged <br />and are put into Debt Fund No. 3. She requested that these be taken out of <br />that fund and put in another fund to pay off the bonds. Mr. Jaworski disagreed. <br />Mr. Locher said that this is earmarked money which was set aside to pay off the <br />assessments when they come due, and that we will ultimately need the money for <br />that purpose. He noted that the money should be invested; Clerk said it was. <br />Mrs. Swanson said that the bonds have to be paid off and are accumulating in- <br />terest; it is a matter of balancing the interest. Mr. Locher agreed that we <br />have to pick it up somewhere to accumulate it. <br />Mr. Marier asked if we are charging for a hookup fee to an interceptor that isn't <br />there? He stated that we should be charging to hookup to the lateral system. <br />Mr. Jaworski and Mr. Cardinal both thought we were. <br />Mr. Bohjanen noted that the fund is a hookup fund to pay off the Metro Sewer <br />Board allaocation. Mr„ Marier said that we have no allocation this year, and we <br />should charge a lateral hookup fee since the lateral is giving usage. Mrs. <br />Swanson wondered if this meant the fee is being misrepresented; Mr. Marier said <br />it is no different than us saying we have no flowage.. There was discussion. <br />Mr. Marier moved to adopt Resuolution No 12 stating that the $500 hookup fee is <br />for hooking up to the lateral system in Chomonix, and that the title of the <br />Debt Fund N0.3 be changed to state that the money will be used for Sewers and <br />not for paying the Metro Sewer Board allocation. Seconded by Mr. Cardinal. <br />Carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Marier noted that ,ferry odengren was to complete the work on his home that <br />he moved in, such as putting siding on, and thought we should review this, perhaps <br />send a letter. Mr. Bohjanen thought we should check the minutes on this. <br />