Laserfiche WebLink
258 <br />4/2 4/72 <br />Mr. Locher noted that the NW Bell request for aerial telephine lines did not <br />need our approval since the ordinance only covers buried cable, but it was nice <br />of them to send it in. Also, the line was not for a subdivision. Mr. Marier <br />noted that the line would replace 2 sections of existing cable. Mr. Cardinal <br />moved to approve Northwestern Bell's request for aerial cable. Seconded by Mr. <br />Jaworski. Carried with Mr. Marier abstaining. <br />Council discussed for appliciations received for sewer installation licenses. <br />Mr. Cardinal moved to approve sewer installation licenses for the following: <br />El Rehbein & Son, Inc., Berghorst Plumbing & Heating, US Lakes Development Co., <br />and Morris B. Carlson Trenching, providing that a bond is received from Mr. Carlson. <br />Seconded by Mr. Marier. Carried unanimously. <br />The Assessor was asked to report on the increase in valuation which the County <br />had sent cards to everyone on. Mr. Sarner said she had come to answer ques- <br />tions, and noted that the State law says all real property is to be revalued <br />every 2 years, but this is the first year that the County sent out cards telling <br />people what the raise was. She pointed out the following: <br />1. This is the first year that the State will use market value instead of <br />adjusted market value to compute the mill rate. <br />2. This will give the State 3 times the assessed valuation (which increases <br />its bonding powers) and cuts the mill rate to one - third. <br />3. The figures she uses to compute market value come from the County as <br />well as instructions on computing land value. <br />4. The County subscribes to a marketing service to keep abreast of current <br />market value. <br />5. The County assesses Columbus Twp., and she must see that our land which <br />borders on Columbus is valued in the same range. <br />6. The value of land changes according to the tiers of sections. <br />7. Noted that there isn't an acre of land in this Village that anyone will <br />sell for less than $1000, but she has no land assessed at over $500 /acre. <br />8. Adjacent land values aren't more than $50 /acre different; this difference <br />(for comparable land) would be due to access to roads. <br />9. Assessments have been made on the even years, but in 1973 they will be <br />made on the odd years, thus resulting in assessments in 1972 and 1973. <br />10. Anyone disagreeing with their assessment is welcome to call her to dis- <br />cuss the matter. <br />11. The County is issuing new field cards next month, there will be two <br />sets of books, all current information will have to be copied over onto <br />the new books for the 1800 parcels, and one set of books will remain <br />here at all times. <br />Mrs. Gould asked why the County Assessor had gone through Twilight Acres last <br />year. Mrs. Sarner said that a reassessment had been requested by a resident. <br />Mr. Marier asked how many people it takes to get the County Assessor to come in. <br />Mrs. Sarner said that normally the County will do anyone's house if the individ- <br />ual requests it; Twilight Acres was an exception. Mrs. Gould said she hadn't <br />asked the County to reassess them. <br />Mrs. Swanson inquired about the assessment on a piece of land she owned adjoin- <br />ing the creek, stating that the valuation had jumped $200 in one year. There <br />was some discussion on this, with Mrs. Sarner offering to talk to Mrs. Swanson <br />about the matter. <br />