My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/24/1972 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1972
>
04/24/1972 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2014 4:31:02 PM
Creation date
12/18/2014 1:48:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
04/24/1972
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4/24/72 <br />251 <br />Mr. Jaworski noted that they (Morehouses) could put money in escrow for blacktopping, <br />and that it is not reasonable to put in a 20 -year street and then put in utilities. <br />Mr. Cardinal felt we should do like we did with Cecil LaMotte; Mr. Marier agreed that <br />if we ask one developer to do the blacktopping, we should ask them all to. Mr. <br />Bohjanen felt it should be blacktopped. Mr. Locher suggested putting an outside limit <br />on the time in which the work is to be finished. <br />Mr. Blackbird stated that it doesn't make sense to retard development by hindering <br />some of this property from access, that we should encourage building more houses for <br />tax purposes, that we would have many more houses if we didn't require blacktopped <br />streets, which would give additional taxes to cover the maintenance of the gravel streets. <br />Mr. Cardinal noted that the developer who put in blacktopped streets is selling his <br />land off right and left, that he adds the cost of the streets to the price of the lots. <br />Mr. Jaworski didn't feel the added taxes from new houses would pay for maintenance of <br />the streets. <br />Mr. Cardinal felt that if this road goes in we should have it go straight West. Mary <br />Myhre asked if the extension of. 79th would connect up with the roadway (private) <br />running North and South; Mr. Marier thought there could be a turn - around if it didn't. <br />Mr. Jaworski said there was a question of access from a private driveway if they <br />connected (that is, a private driveway would be used as a public roadway, and we <br />might be required to take it over later). <br />Following more discussion, Mr. Cardinal moved that we abide by the ordinance on this <br />and require that blacktop be put in. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Carried. <br />Mr. Marier reported that the P &Z had discussed certification of our sign code, <br />Ordinance No. 51, as requested by the Council. He asked if a copy of the ordinance <br />was to be submitted to the State. Mr. Locher stated that a copy of the Council's <br />resolution and the P &Z's resolution must be submitted. <br />Mr. Marier moved that we authorize the Attorney to handle certification of our sign <br />code. Seconded by Mr. Cardinal. Carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Marier reported that Glenn Rehbein had asked for a variance to use overhead wiring <br />in the Shenandoah plat since no sewer would be in there this summer, he cannot put in <br />any utilities underground, and blacktopping the streets would be unfeasible. Mr. <br />Rehbein had stated he would like to go to septic tanks, the P &Z recommended that <br />percolation tests be taken, and if possible, that he (Glenn) skip every other lot. <br />Glen Rehbein commented as follows: <br />1. He had talked to his financing company and was told that they wouldn't <br />give him financing on septic systems. <br />2. He wished to petition to go ahead and put sewer lines in there and <br />pump the sewage if necessary. <br />3. He had gone ahead with the whole project based on the Oct. 20, 1971, letter <br />from the Metro Sewer Board which stated that they would put in and <br />interceptor or trunk line down Birch Street. <br />4. He feels that Jandric will demand a sewer line also. <br />5. Asked why the Council can't act on the basis of the MSB letter. <br />6. Doesn't want overhead lines, but they would be temporary. <br />7. Wants to put the sewer lines in first and follow them with buried cable. <br />8. All can see that the County's park proposal is nothing but a Metro Park, <br />and that the Village should work for the sewer line before the area is taken <br />over by the parks. <br />9. He wished to have the Council refund the money held in escrow towards <br />the engineering costs as he needs that $23,000 for working capital. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.