Laserfiche WebLink
1 8 <br />requested so that time used on certain projects might be charged to that project. <br />Mr. Locher stated there might be a problem in collecting for this time if the bills <br />had already been sent and paid by the respective persons. <br />The Clerk was asked to type copies of the ordinance concerning the sewerage of <br />inflammable liquids and mail them to the P&Z and Council. <br />The letter from Chomonix regarding the park dedication for Lakes Addition No. 2 was <br />read, stating that they will set aside 6.5 acres for park purposes or a possible <br />cash settlement, whichever we decide we want. Mr. Ja *orski mentioned that the Park <br />Board had held a special meeting on April 2nd to discuss this with the Engineer and <br />the Planner. Jandric representatives had also been present. They had decided to hold <br />off on picking a park site and to take credit for the acreage like we had done in Lakes <br />Addition No. 1. Mr. L'Allier stated that he had talked on the phone with the rest of <br />the Council members and all had agreed to accept this letter for additional credit. <br />However, they had all felt that prior to any additional plats, we would decide on <br />which acreage to take for a park or else take money. Alternatives considered were <br />land on the unplatted south side of Reshanau Lake, on the north side or asking Jandric <br />to guarantee some land on each of the lakes they hold land on. Mr. L'Allier stated <br />that on the basis of this letter and the receipt of the necessary street bonds, the <br />Clerk and he had signed the final plat of Lakes Addn. No. 2. Mr. Jaworski stated <br />that they had received the information that Jandric only owns land on Reshanau Lake. <br />Mr. Gotwald commented that they hold a contract for deed on land near the creek. <br />1 <br />Mr. Locher stated that the street bonds were okay except that the name of Stan S. Watkins, <br />principal for Bituminous Surface Treating Co., was not typed in and that this should be <br />corrected. The Clerk will clear this with U. S. Lakes. <br />The Clerk read a letter from Chomonix stating that Lakes Addition No. 2 must have water <br />and sewer service no later than August 1, 1970 based. on their projected possession <br />dates. After discussion, it was decided the Clerk would send a letter to U. S. Lakes <br />stating that our Engineer is working on the information requested by the Metro Sewer <br />Board, that he expects to have the preliminary reports within the next month, that <br />we cannot commit ourselves to an exact date. We can probably have water for them by <br />August 1st, and sewer within one year, but that a temporary tank could be used for a <br />few houses. Carbon copies will be sent to the Council members. <br />The Clerk read e letter from Peter Scherer regarding 64th Street and a notarized letter <br />from Harry Proulx he had submitted to the Council in 1967 concerning the Village's <br />responsibility for maintenance thereof. The Clerk stated that this letter could not <br />be found in the file and was thought to have been removed sometime in 1967 when the <br />files had been found opened. W. Scherer stated that the problem was that the Village <br />had rebuilt 64th in 1966 so that it followed the section line and no longer came straight <br />into his place. The letter had stated to what point the Village had originally main- <br />tained the road. Mr. Scherer stated that the Village was now only maintaining about <br />half of the road compared to prior rebuilding. There was considerable discussion, <br />including the producing of the road easements acquired in 1965. Mr. Scherer stated <br />that they had raised the road, but only half way and that he received the runoff; also, <br />they don't go as far as his culvert. He wished the Village to either move the property <br />line back or to maintain 64th like they had before. Mr. O'Flannagan stated that <br />Mr. Backlin had supervised the rebuilding of 64th. He also stated that the top of <br />the road was only 19 feet in width. Mr. Gotwald stated that this was acceptable when <br />the Village replaces an existing road. Mr. Gotwald felt we should use the original <br />1 <br />