My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/26/1970 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1970
>
10/26/1970 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2014 12:02:16 PM
Creation date
12/23/2014 9:32:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/26/1970
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br />21 <br />10/26/70 <br />The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes Village Council held on October 26, 1970, <br />was called to order at 8:07 p.m. by Mayor L'Allier with all members present. <br />Mayor L'Allier inquired whether the Council wished to act upon the minutes of <br />October 13, which had been mailed to the Councilmen on the previous Thursday <br />but which had been returned because of insufficient postage, thus having <br />just been received this evening. <br />Mr. Bohjanen stated that, on page 5 of the minutes, the person who had made the <br />statements concerning Jandric was not here, but that he was sure that it had <br />been stated that it was a rumor that Jandric was going defunct. Mr. L'Allier <br />disputed that, stating that Crystal had stated three times that Charles Weaver <br />had made that statement and that it was not an assumption. <br />Mr. Jaworski moved to accept the minutes as so corrected. Seconded by Mr. <br />Rosengren. Carried unanimously. <br />The Clerk reported that the affidavits of publication for Ordinance No. 54 on <br />inflammable liquids had been received. A letter from Northern States Power Co. <br />concerning service lines near swimming pools and the future adoption of an <br />ordinance governing same was read. Copies of ordinances from Coon Rapids and <br />Columbia Heights adopting the PCA regulations on air standards were before each <br />member. Mayor L'Allier stated that he had asked the Clerk to send a letter to <br />the PCA indicating that we are working on an ordinance to adopt their regu- <br />lations on same. A letter will also be sent to our County Sanitarian, Mr. <br />Hutchison, requesting a model ordinance on the regulation of air pollution and <br />burning. <br />The Clerk reported that a request had been made by 3M Advertizing Co. to amend <br />sign permit #18, to wit: that the size of the sign granted be increased from <br />14' by 30' (420 sq. ft.) to 16' by 40' (640 sq. ft.). The sum of $5.00 had <br />been paid for the increase in area. Mr. Bohjanen moved to authorize the change <br />in size as requested providing that the Engineer checks the request against the <br />ordinance. Seconded by Mr. Rosengren. Carried unanimously. <br />A letter from Joseph P. Summers, attorney for Crystal Ahlman and Gilbert Menkveld, <br />concerning the Village's reimbursement of Mr. Jaworski and Mr. Locher for time <br />spent at the Court hearing on the injunction against the mobile home park ballot <br />was read. Mayor L'Allier stated that he had been in Phoenix, Arizona at the <br />time of the hearing and could not attend; therefore Mr. Jaworski, as Acting <br />Mayor, had appeared in his place. The Village had then paid Mr. Jaworski for <br />lost salary on that day. As Mr. Summers notes in the letter, Miss Ahlman and <br />Mr. Menkveld brought the action; the Village therefore defended against this <br />action. Mr. L'Allier felt that the Village should pay these expenses and not <br />the private party who paid the election costs. <br />Attorney Locher stated that the Village had been named in the action, not the <br />person who had requested the ballot. The Village was attacked and had to <br />defend itself. As far as the actual costs of the election, such as the ballots, <br />these were billed directly to Mr. Scherer. The question of the case in court <br />is different. If Mr. Summers wishes he could go back to the Court for an <br />interpretation; subsequent action r ould cost the Village more. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.