Laserfiche WebLink
164 <br />COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 <br />and have zoning designations for urban densities. Currently <br />there is nothing in the ordinances that states if sanitary sewer <br />is not available, lot sizes must be 10 acres or more. This <br />proposed ordinance replaces Emergency Ordinance No. 93 - 11. <br />This ordinance establishes rules for areas that are unsewered <br />including minimum size for lots. The exceptions include: 1) <br />lots of record established prior to July 13, 1992 if they can <br />demonstrate that they can have an on-site septic system; or 2) a <br />habitable single family home constructed prior to July 13, 1992 <br />may reduce its lot size to a one (1) acre lot size provided that <br />the balance of the acreage is 10 acres or the balance of the <br />acreage can be served by sewer and water such as along Marvy <br />Street. <br />Commercial and industrial lots are made an exception to the <br />ordinance and all non-residential uses in these districts are <br />permitted through a site plan review. The minimum lot size will <br />be 10 acres and shall not apply to smaller parcels of record or <br />newly created unsewered lots provided the following conditions <br />are met: can demonstrate that an on-site septic system will work <br />and provided the developer will waive the right to appeal future <br />local improvements under the City Charter. This provision would <br />only apply to new subdivisions to get flexibility for smaller <br />lots and would not interfere with the future utility planning in <br />the area. <br />Mr. Brixius noted that the ordinance is generally focused on <br />allowing a farmer to keep his homestead on as little as one (1) <br />acre and sell off the balance of the farm for development. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked when a subdivision is requested and <br />a one (1) acre parcel remains with the homestead and the larger <br />parcel is developed into sewered lots, is there a provision to <br />make the one (1) acre lot connect to sewer and water. Mr. <br />Brixius said no, not as long as the septic system is existing and <br />functioning. The current ordinances require that the parcel <br />connect to sewer and water when either the septic system or well <br />fails. This is consistent with what has happened in the past. <br />Council Member Kuether moved to adopt the first reading of <br />Ordinance No. 93 - 18 Amending Appendix B1, Zoning Ordinance, <br />Section 4, Subdivision 17, Areas Without Sanitary Sewer. Council <br />Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT <br />Consideration of Resolution No. 77 - 93, Receiving Report and <br />Calling Hearing on Improvement, Lake Drive (County Road <br />#23)/Highway #49 Intersection - The feasibility report for the <br />PAGE 6 <br />1 <br />1 <br />