Laserfiche WebLink
17, <br />COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 13, 1995 <br />City relies on the school district's information. <br />Mr. Tom Sohrweide, SEH explained that the first traffic issue <br />presented by the Planning and Zoning Board is that Otter Lake <br />Road, in its present condition and size, cannot handle the <br />traffic that would come out of this development. He explained <br />that the study was completed taking into consideration all five <br />(5) phases of the total development of approximately 400 to 450 <br />lots. Mr. Sohrweide explained that the current two (2) lane <br />roadway is sufficient in capacity and carrying capability to <br />handle the traffic this development would generate. In addition, <br />this development would not cause any changes in intersection <br />control at either end of Otter Lake Road. This situation will <br />change when retail/commercial development occurs at I35E and Main <br />Street (CSAH 14). <br />Mr. Sohrweide noted that the Planning and Zoning Board expressed <br />a concern about pedestrian and bicycle traffic. This concern was <br />not addressed in the SEH traffic study. Mr. Powell explained <br />that the latest plat map incorporates a trail east of Otter Lake <br />Road from the park area to the south boundary of the plat. Mr. <br />Sohrweide explained that the traffic volume that this subdivision <br />would generate during the peak hour would be to the south <br />destined for County Road J. There would be approximately 100 <br />vehicles leaving the subdivision during the P.M. peak hour and <br />about 200 coming from that direction going to the subdivision. To <br />the north it is projected that there would be about 50 vehicles <br />leaving the subdivision and about 110 coming to the subdivision. <br />Another concern was that the study was completed with the entire <br />development in mind and the flow through the development could <br />pose problems with the circulation of traffic if only the first <br />two (2) phases were completed. This has been addressed by the <br />changes made by the developer and outlined by Mr. Johnson. Mr. <br />Sohrweide explained that the Planning and Zoning Board asked how <br />much traffic would be generated by the theater complex which is <br />under construction on County Road J and I35E. He noted that his <br />firm reviewed the traffic study that was completed for White Bear <br />Township for the theater complex site. The study projected that <br />the traffic generated by the theaters during the peak P.M. <br />traffic period would be about 10% to and from a combination of <br />the 20th Avenue and Otter Lake Road to the north. This amounts <br />to about six (6) cars during the P.M. peak period coming off of <br />Otter Lake Road destined for the theater site and six (6) cars <br />coming off of 20th Avenue and three (3) during the peak hour <br />returning in those directions. During the traffic peak hour when <br />roadway capacity/space is at a premium, the theater impact <br />appears to be very little. Mr. Powell summarized by stating that <br />the impact of the theater traffic will be to the south on I35E <br />and Centerville Road. This was taken into consideration in <br />PAGE 12 <br />