Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 27, 1995 <br />does not fit appropriately in every community and that is why <br />"flexibility" allows the model to fit each community. <br />Council Member Kuether moved to adopt the FIRST READING of <br />Ordinance No. 4 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council <br />Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />FIRST READING Ordinance No. 3 - 95 Amending the Sign Ordinance - <br />Ms. Wyland explained that this proposed ordinance amendment is <br />intended to allow advertising signs only within the City's Rural <br />Zoning Districts. The proposed ordinance amendment is consistent <br />with directives contained within the 1990 I35E and I35W <br />Interchange Study. <br />The proposed ordinance amendment would not allow the display of <br />advertising signs in any zoning district other than Rural. Staff <br />and the Planning and Zoning Board recommended that the FIRST <br />READING of this proposed ordinance amendment be adopted. <br />Council Member Neal asked if advertising signs would be allowed <br />in the areas where requests for sign permits were denied by the <br />City Council last year. Ms. Wyland said no, that sign permit <br />request was for the interchange area which is zoned General <br />Business or Light Industrial. <br />Council Member Bergeson noted that there is a zoning called Rural <br />Business Reserve (R -BR). He asked if this zoning is included in <br />Rural designation. Mr. Brixius said that yes, this area has an <br />underlying zoning of Rural. Council Member Bergeson asked if R - <br />BR zoning is a separate zoning and should it be separately <br />spelled out in the ordinance. Mr. Brixius said it is a separate <br />zoning district and is different than the Rural Zoning district. <br />He explained that the staff concentrated on the areas around the <br />interchanges and decided that when utilities become available to <br />the R -BR Zoning district, that district will be rezoned to a <br />commercial district. Council Member Bergeson said he was more <br />concerned about the wording in the ordinance and asked if the <br />R -BR Zoning district should be specially spelled out in the <br />proposed ordinance. Mr. Brixius said that the City Council may <br />do one of two things; first the R -BR district can be specifically <br />addressed as a rural district until utilities become available or <br />the current language in the proposed ordinance can remain the <br />same as presented which means that the R -BR Zoning District will <br />be excluded from the proposed Sign Ordinance amendment. Council <br />Member Bergeson said he would prefer that the ordinance be as <br />specific as possible. Mr. Brixius asked for direction from the <br />Council as to whether or not billboard signs should be excluded <br />from the R -BR Zoning district. Council Member Bergeson noted <br />that Mr. Brixius stated that it was the intention of staff to <br />PAGE 13 <br />