My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/12/1996 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1996
>
02/12/1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2015 11:56:58 AM
Creation date
1/26/2015 11:01:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
02/12/1996
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />i <br />CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1996 <br />Mr. Ahrens presented a handout to each Council Member which listed each segment of <br />all the MSA streets in the City and compared the MSA streets using the street inventory <br />rating. The worst street is at the beginning of the list and the best street is at the bottom <br />of the list. A segment of West Shadow Lake Drive is rated as the worst street in the City <br />and three (3) segments of Ware Road are also at the top of this list. Mr. Ahrens noted <br />that out of 294 road segments in this City, Holly Drive ranks 107th. He also noted the <br />average daily traffic, as counted in 1993, for comparison to see which streets have more <br />traffic and which streets have less traffic. <br />Council Member Bergeson noted that there had been a proposal to improve West Shadow <br />Lake Drive north of Birch Street. However, the residents did not support the proposal <br />and it was dropped. <br />Council Member Lyden noted that three (3) segments of Holly Drive are listed as eight <br />(8), nine (9) and ten (10) on Mr. Ahrens list. He asked how quickly would these numbers <br />drop and "mirror" Ware Road when Trapper's Crossing is fully developed. Mr. Ahrens <br />explained how to determine what the additional traffic on Holly Drive will be. Council <br />Member Lyden asked how fast would the numbers for Holly Drive drop to a two (2) or <br />three (3). Mr. Ahrens explained that there are many variables to consider and it would be <br />very difficult to predict. He said that Ware Road is deteriorating faster than Holly Drive <br />will because Ware Road has a lot more traffic and there is a lot more organic material <br />under Ware Road. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked how long will it take to complete both phases of <br />Trapper's Crossing. Mr. Ahrens said he did not know, it would depend on how quickly <br />the developer can get approval from the City. Mr. Corson, the developers representative, <br />explained that the developer is looking at four (4) years at the very least and most likely <br />six (6) years. There will be a total of 115 homes. <br />Council Member Bergeson noted that the City Council talked with the consulting planner <br />Al Brixius and asked him to put his comments in writing. Mr. Ahrens read a letter <br />written to Mr. Schumacher by Mr. Brixius so that it would become part of the record. <br />Council Member Bergeson noted that the City Council had asked for a clarification from <br />the City Attorney on what the City agreed to in the developers agreement for Trapper's <br />Crossing. The attorney for the developer was at the Council work session and gave his <br />opinion about what he felt that the developer had agreed to related to that project . Mr. <br />Hawkins explained that the entire issue concerning what the developers obligation is falls <br />back to the Council resolution/motion approving the preliminary plat in August, 1994. <br />He explained that the motion made by Council Member Kuether to approve the <br />preliminary plat is made on the condition that the developer take action necessary to <br />complete a satisfactory plan for the reconstruction of Holly Drive/12th Avenue. There <br />was further discussion and Mr. Hokanson (the developer) asked if the motion was <br />requiring him to pay for the entire reconstruction. Mr. Hawkins explained that the <br />motion was requiring a satisfactory plan for the reconstruction of the street being <br />PAGE 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.