Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 22, 1996 <br />could be reduced to 25 mph across the front of the school. If the City wants to reduce the <br />speed zone in front of the school, the City has to request a speed study by the MnDOT. <br />They would monitor the traffic speed and take the 85 percentile and set that as the speed <br />limit. Considering that the current speed limit is 30 mph, the speed limit on the street <br />could be raised to 40 mph or even 45 mph. <br />Mr. Killy asked about nuisance signs. Mr. Ahrens explained that installing "nuisance" <br />stop signs can potentially cause problems. People drive up to the sign and see that <br />nobody is coming and then "drift" through the stop sign without coming to a full stop. <br />The problem created in this case is that someday somebody may be coming when the car <br />is "drifting" through the sign resulting in an accident. Mr. Killy said that would be a <br />good place for the Police Department to make some extra money. Mr. Ahrens said that <br />staff and residents can look at the speed patterns on Elm Street and make a decision on <br />what can be done to take care of speed problems. He felt that additional police patrol and <br />ticketing would be the best speeding deterrent. Mr. Ahrens said that it is hard to include <br />any design feature that adequately controls speed efficiently. <br />Mr. Mitchell clarified traffic volumes after the middle school is opened. He explained <br />that in 1997, Elm Street without the middle school will be handling about approximately <br />1200 vehicles per day. The traffic projection with the middle school occupied and <br />regardless of what road option is selected, would be an additional 300 to 400 vehicles per <br />day on Second Avenue and another 400 to 500 vehicles per day on Elm Street. Mr. <br />Mitchell said that Option F does not realign Elm Street significantly so traffic projections <br />would be about the same. Mr. Killy said that makes his point more significant. More <br />speed control should be made on Second Avenue and Elm Street. Twice a day for 10 to <br />20 minutes morning and afternoon, there will be no getting out of his driveway onto <br />Second Avenue. <br />Mr. Killy said his last concern was the businesses that could be constructed near the Lake <br />Drive/Elm Street intersection. He asked if it could it be possible to not allow any <br />businesses a driveway onto Elm Street. Mr. Ahrens reminded the City Council that Mr. <br />Mitchell had already addressed the parcels zoned for businesses. Anoka County or <br />MnDOT will not allow a driveway access to Lake Drive. The driveways would access <br />Elm Street. The County and MnDOT are concerned that their roadways have only a <br />minimum number of driveways or intersections to allow traffic to flow freely and <br />minimize traffic conflicts. <br />Donna Kriegler, 6443 - 20th Avenue presented a petition signed by Lino Lakes citizens <br />in support of a traffic light options A, B or F. She said she owns 10 acres on another <br />County Road where the speed limit is posted 55 mph. Her children do not play in the <br />street and are not allowed near the street. Ms. Kriegler said she came from another area <br />of the City and did not want to leave the school district. She said that she would like to <br />challenge the neighbors who are closely involved, without being disrespectful, to get over <br />this, get past it. This is not a little micro city. There are many students and families <br />involved. Everyone is here for the same reason. Ms. Kriegler said that you are making <br />PAGE 21 <br />