My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/13/1997 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1997
>
10/13/1997 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2015 12:53:58 PM
Creation date
1/29/2015 12:01:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/13/1997
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 13, 1997 <br />Area and Unit Fund <br />Trunk Sewer Area Charge <br />Sewer Connection Unit Charge <br />Trunk Water Area Charge <br />Water Connection Unit Charge <br />$148,328.40 <br />127,991.00 <br />158,127.20 <br />206,663.00 <br />$ 329,398.77 <br />641,109.60 <br />Wearing Course Fund 0.00 <br />Surface Water Management Fund 0.00 <br />Total Assessment $ 970,508.37 <br />Mr. Powell reviewed detailed assessment computations, including explanation of assessable front <br />footage and assessable area for lateral benefit (area and unit charges). The assessment roll <br />applies to four properties, assessed pursuant to the applicable area calculations. <br />Council Member Bergeson acknowledged correspondence from two of the affected property <br />owners, Richard Schreier and Cyril and Catherine LaCasse. He then asked if the LaCasse <br />property is zoned industrial, or if that property is considered homestead. Mr. Powell responded <br />that the LaCasse property is homestead, and that the referenced correspondence was received <br />after preparation of the assessment roll. <br />Mr. Ahrens added that this portion of Lino Lakes is exempt from Charter specifications; <br />therefore, Chapter 429 rules apply with the exception of homestead property which is deferred <br />until development of that property. With respect to the Schreier property, Mr. Ahrens <br />recommended that the assessment roll be adopted with Mr. Schreier free to pursue his objection <br />to the assessment. <br />City Attorney Hawkins explained the process with respect to an objection, stating that the City <br />may go forward with adoption of the assessment roll, and objectors can file an appeal with the <br />District Court which would then determine whether or not there is special benefit in the amount <br />of the assessment. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked why the interest rate on this proposed assessment is set at 7- <br />1/2% as opposed to 7% for the previous project. Mr. Powell explained that a bond was issued for <br />this project, where no bond was issued for the Clearwater Creek Second Addition project. <br />There being no further questions from Council, Mayor Landers declared the public hearing on <br />this matter open at 7:13 P.M. <br />Elise Tagg, 7504 Lake Drive, requested explanation of the right-of-way purchase. Mr. Powell <br />stated that a number of properties were involved with the right-of-way purchased proportionately <br />from each one. <br />Hearing no further public response, Council Member Kuether moved to close the public hearing <br />at 7:15 P.M. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.