My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/22/1997 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1997
>
10/22/1997 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2015 12:54:03 PM
Creation date
1/29/2015 12:09:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/22/1997
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 22, 1997 <br />Mr. Montain explained that if the ballot question falls, he would ask for a joint Charter <br />Commission and City Council meeting to investigate a Charter amendment to allow for <br />street reconstruction. <br />Council directed Mr. Montain and Mr. Schumacher to get together and prepare a <br />resolution for Council consideration explaining the Council's position on this item. <br />The resolution will be placed on the October 27th agenda. <br />DISCUSS WATER SUPPLY PLAN, DAVID AHRENS <br />Council directed staff to place this item on the next Council work session. <br />I-35W/LAKE DRIVE INTERCHANGE, TAGG ASSESSMENT, DAVID AHRENS <br />At the last Council meeting, all assessments were adopted with the exception of the Tagg <br />assessment. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Tagg were at that meeting and had objected to th , .s. nd how <br />their property is classified by the Anoka County Assessor u�. noka <br />County Assessor was contacted and he and the Tagg e; a mutually <br />acceptable land classification. <br />The Taggs have requested the City of �� ' say' assessment situation as was <br />offered to the properties along ained the Lilac Street situation was <br />different. Those property • �' _ '' o. titin for the improvements. This was a City <br />project and those prop e project were allowed to petition into the project and <br />accept an assess n 5 e Drive project was petitioned by the property <br />owners and asses nst the benefiting properties must be determined according <br />to the provisions e ity Charter. <br />The Taggs have requested that their homestead be separated from the balance of the <br />property and that there be no assessments until they hookup to utilities or develop the <br />land. Mr. and Mrs. Tagg were in the audience and explained that they cannot afford to <br />pay more taxes and assessments. <br />Staff was directed to review aerial maps to determine approximately how much of the <br />Tagg property is wetland and to prepare an assessment proposal. This information will be <br />brought to the next Council work session. <br />DISCUSS STAGGERING UTILITY BILLING ZONES, DAVID AHRENS <br />The City has 2100 utility accounts in eight (8) different zones. The accounts are billed <br />quarterly. <br />PAGE 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.