My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/28/1997 Council Minutes (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1997
>
07/28/1997 Council Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2015 3:51:35 PM
Creation date
1/30/2015 10:36:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
07/28/1997
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 28, 1997 <br />Ms. Wyland stated that the applicant would like to remove the existing dwelling and garage and provide for two <br />building sites. Both sites meet the area requirements of the R-1 Zoning District. Lot 1 would be 15,750 square feet <br />in area (105 x 150) and Lot 2 would be 16,750 square feet (approximately 124 x 133). The Zoning Ordinance <br />provides a minimum lot area of 10,800 square feet with a lot width of 80 feet and depth of 135 feet (corner lots <br />require 105 feet). Lot 1 meets the area, width and depth requirements. Lot 2 meets the area and width requirements <br />but is 2 feet deficient in lot depth. This is due to the street right of way for Laurene Avenue being 83 feet in front of <br />this lot. The standard street right of way is 60 feet. Lot 2 also contains a 33 -foot -wide UPA easement (for power <br />poles) on the southern border of the site. this easement area may not be used for construction but it can be used for <br />yard area. A home can still be constructed on the remaining 91 feet and meet all setback requirements. <br />A variance for 2 feet in lot depth is required to allow Lot 2 to meet the minimum lot depth requirement. It would <br />appear that the following criteria can be met to justify the granting of such a variance: <br />1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by <br />the official controls. <br />2. That the plight of the landowners is due to circumstances unique to that property, not of his creation. <br />3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and a reasonable use for the property <br />exists under the terms of the Ordinance. <br />4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would <br />be denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. <br />5. That the proposed actions will not unreasonably diminish or impair established property values <br />within the neighborhood. <br />6. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Ordinance. <br />In lieu of granting a variance, an excessive amount of right of way exists on Laurene Avenue which will not be <br />required for future street construction. In fact, this lot appears to be the only parcel where the additional right of way <br />has been taken. An alternative to granting the variance would be to vacate a 17 -foot x 100 -foot strip of right of way <br />and adding that land to Lot 2. The vacation of this portion of right of way would provide a more uniform setback <br />line for Lots 1 and 2 and eliminate the 17 -foot jog in the property line. The City Engineer has no objections to this <br />street vacation, discussion of which appears in a subsequent portion of these minutes. <br />The subject property is currently zoned Rural. The Land Use Plan, however, indicates the site as single-family. A <br />designation of R-1 would provide compatibility with the area to the north and west, which is R-1. The area <br />immediately south is zoned Rural, but is nonconforming in that the lots are slightly larger than one acre in size. <br />Should Council find this request acceptable, Staff recommends the following conditions of approval: <br />1. The City Engineer review and approve grading, drainage and utility plans for the two new lots. <br />2. Permits be obtained from Rice Creek Watershed District, if required. <br />3. One Park Dedication fee in the amount of $500 be collected prior to recording of the minor subdivision. <br />This dedication would cover the newly created lot. <br />4. MUSA designation be provided to the property from the City's Interim MUSA Reserve. <br />5. A variance for 2 feet in lot depth be granted for Lot 2 or, in the alternative, the City grant the vacation of <br />17 feet of Laurene Avenue right of way and add it to Lot 2. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.