Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 28, 1997 <br />Jill Schroeder, 432 Lilac, agreed with Mrs. Ramsden. <br />Doug Ramsden, 518 Lilac, asked if road improvement is to be included in this project. Mr. Ahrens responded that <br />the project is limited to installation of sewer and water. <br />There being no further public input, Mayor Landers called for a motion to close the public hearing. Council Member <br />Lyden moved to close the public hearing at 6:52 P.M. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />6:30 P.M. - PUBLIC HEARING, LAKES ADDITIONS STREET IMPROVEMENTS, <br />DAVID AHRENS <br />Mr. Ahrens explained that the City Council accepted the feasibility report for the proposed reconstruction of the <br />following streets: <br />E. Shadow Lk. Drive Black Duck Drive Cul-de-sac <br />Lantern Lane Black Duck Drive E. Shadow Lake Drive <br />Lantern Circle Lantern Lane Cul-de-sac <br />Partridge Place Black Duck Drive Black Duck Drive <br />Black Duck Drive Birch Street 230' N. Crystal Court <br />Black Duck Circle Black Duck Drive Cul-de-sac <br />Mallard Lane Black Duck Drive Cul-de-sac <br />Crystal Court Black Duck Drive Cul-de-sac <br />This project consists of the total reconstruction of the subject streets to a 7 -ton design strength. <br />Mr. Ahrens reminded Council that inception of this project occurred in September of 1996 when the Charter <br />Commission and the City Council met to determine need for street reconstruction within Lino Lakes. Mr. Ahrens <br />was directed at that time to compile a street reconstruction plan and recommendation for phasing this activity, which <br />resulted in determination that the above streets are most needy. Mr. Ahrens was then directed to order a feasibility <br />report with respect to street improvements in this area of the City. Mr. Dave Hahn, Senior Project Manager for SEH, <br />prepared this report, which was accepted by Council on June 23, 1997. <br />Mr. Ahrens summarized the Charter guidelines which come into play with respect to this project. First is the 60 -day <br />waiting period which will follow the close of the public hearing. During this period, property owners will have the <br />opportunity to petition the City against the project. If the majority of property owners is in favor of the project, it <br />will go forward with all affected property owners assessed. If the majority petitions against the project, it will not go <br />forward. Mr. Ahrens stated that if the project is met with favor of the property owners, it will then go to Citywide <br />public vote on November 4, 1997. <br />Mr. Hahn explained that analysis of soil at the location of existing roadways was completed as part of the feasibility <br />report. Television of the sanitary sewers was performed, but not completed in time to be included in the current <br />report. Mr. Hahn indicated that the study shows that the existing water main does not require replacement. <br />However, the existing storm system is in poor condition and should be reconstructed. He further indicated that the <br />streets are subject to poor drainage in a high water table area, which has significantly contributed to their <br />considerable deterioration and need for reconstruction. <br />Mr. Hahn stated that assessments take into account street costs of approximately $1,500,000, $191,000 for storm <br />sewer reconstruction, and total sanitary sewer repair of $100,000 over 183 lots. He summarized the costs as follows: <br />Street reconstruction assessed at $2,000 per lot, for a total of $366,000. Storm sewer reconstruction would be <br />assessed at $1,045 per lot, based on the total construction cost of $191,000 over 183 lots. Mr. Hahn's study <br />proposes that the cost of sanitary sewer repairs be borne by the Area and Unit Fund. Total elective City funds <br />proposed for use in connection with this project would then amount to $1,232,800; total project cost $1,890,100. <br />