My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/28/1997 Council Minutes (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1997
>
07/28/1997 Council Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2015 3:51:35 PM
Creation date
1/30/2015 10:36:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
07/28/1997
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 28, 1997 <br />• Council Member Kuether moved to approve National Night Out, August 5, 1997. Council Member Neal seconded <br />the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />• <br />A copy of the Proclamation can be found at the end of these minutes. <br />6:30 P.M. - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING, EXTENSION OF LILAC <br />STREET SEWER AND WATER UTILITIES, DAVID AHRENS <br />Mr. Ahrens reminded Council that the public hearing for this project was opened on July 14, 1997 to solicit <br />comments from owners of property adjacent to the proposed extension of utilities on Lilac Street between Fourth <br />Avenue and Apollo Drive. The public hearing was continued so that Staff and Council could discuss assessment <br />options. At Council's work session on Wednesday, July 23, 1997, Staff presented three options for assessments. <br />These options are summarized as follows: <br />Option 1 - This is the original proposal from the feasibility report with all construction costs and area and unit <br />charges assessed to each property owner. The surface water management charge was adjusted to reflect a credit for <br />storm water discharged into the existing Lino Industrial Park pond. The total amount assessed to the properties on <br />the south side of Lilac Street is estimated at $170,300 (approximately $25,000 for each property). <br />Option 2 - This assessment roll option includes assessments for construction costs only. Area and unit charges will <br />be assessed at the time of connection to the utility. The assessment to each of the properties on the south side of <br />Lilac Street is estimated at $14,936, based on actual construction costs. The total of all assessments is $110,380. It <br />is assumed that Boe Ornamental will connect to the utilities immediately and, therefore, its assessment includes the <br />area and unit charges. <br />Option 3 - This assessment roll option is based on the City paying for the construction costs and "banking" the costs <br />until the property owners elect to connect to the utilities. At the time of connection, the City will assess the <br />construction costs and area and unit charges. Taking into account the assumption that Boe Ornamental will connect <br />to the utilities immediately, the total revenue will be $35,700. <br />The estimated project cost, including 30% overhead for engineering expense, is $176,729. The annual amount <br />certified to the County for each property owner under Option 2 is approximately $1,700 per year over a fifteen -year <br />period at 7%. <br />Mr. Ahrens explained that the south side of Lilac Street is within the MUSA boundary and exempt from the City <br />Charter. This means that all south side properties not currently homesteaded can, at Council's discretion, be <br />assessed for public improvements. The Ramsden property is currently being used as a home site and, therefore, falls <br />under Charter rules which allows for petitioning against these improvements. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked if the Ramsden property is included on the list of properties provided to Council <br />prior to the start of the meeting which includes all parcels effected by this project. Mr. Ahrens indicated that the <br />Ramsden property appears on the list under PIN No. 0007. <br />Council Member Neal asked why the sewer line couldn't be located behind the buildings on Lilac Street. Mr. <br />Ahrens explained that such routing would require acquisition of easements from all of the property owners at a <br />considerable cost to the City; and, location of the lines at the rear of the existing buildings would not allow for <br />service at a future date to the north side of Lilac. <br />Mayor Landers opened the public hearing at 6:48 P.M. <br />Betty Ramsden, 502 Lilac Street, reminded the Council that she opposes the project. She indicated her preference <br />for implementation of Option No. 3. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.