Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/16/1998 Council Minutes• • MINUTES MARCH 16, 1998 LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MONDAY, March 16, 1998 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT : STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT . Mayor Sullivan, Council Members Bergeson, Dahl, Neal Lyden City Engineer, Dave Ahrens; Acting City Administrator, Dave Pecchia; Community Development Director, Brian Wessel; Assistant to the Administrator, Dan Tesch; Parks and Recreation Director, Rick DeGardner; Community Development Assistant, Mary Alice Divine and Clerk -Treasurer Marilyn Anderson. Dave Pecchia explained that the purpose of the work session was to provide a broad overview of the City's financial status regarding several areas including the Area and Unit Fund and the potential bonding for 1998 projects. IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, DAVE AHRENS Dave presented a brief outline of improvement projects scheduled for 1998 construction and future projects scheduled for 1999 through 2003. He also provided proposed funding sources for the projects. See Schedule "A" attached. Schedule "A" also outlines the funding sources. Kim asked what determines if funding will come from bonding, assessments, TIF etc. Brian explained that Mary Vaske is wrestling with this and it will be a financial call. Dave explained how some projects are funded through Area and Unit funds, MSA funds, assessments or shared funds. John asked if the Area and Unit Charge Fund is replenished when undeveloped areas are developed. Dave said that is how the fund grows. There will be a time when there will be very little development in Lino Lakes. Staff will have to watch and determine at what level this fund should be maintained. Dave also explained that there will be some payments to the fund for oversizing mains to handle future development. Kim asked how often does the City adjust the rate on which Area and Unit Fund Charges are based? Dave explained that the rates are adjusted every year according to the ENR index. He also explained what this index is. Kim asked if this formula was determined by statute or can the City adjust the formula. Dave explained that the Area and Unit Charge Fund was created by a resolution of the City Council. A copy of that resolution creating that fund was included in the packet. Kim asked if water towers are funded by this fund. Dave said yes. Kim asked if the City will need another water tower. Dave explained that the Comprehensive Water Plan study will indicated whether another one is needed. PAGE 1 MINUTES MARCH 16, 1998 John noted that there were no clear-cut proposals on how to split the payment of bonding costs and non-bonding costs. He noted that the cost of bonding is the lowest its been in 25 years. Is that a reason to bond more than the City normally would? VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT, BRIAN WESSEL (SCHEDULE B) Brian explained that the Village is designed to pay for itself. He outlined the portions of the Village purchased by the City from Glenn Rehbein and the portion purchased from the Funkhausers. He also outlined the 25 acre parcel of Park Reserve that will come to the City via a land exchange with Anoka County. He noted that the City can only use 14.72 acres and the remaining portion of this parcel will be used by Anoka County to house a trailhead lodge and trail. Brian noted that the land exchange will be finalized after the final hearing concerning the Ed Vaughan property. He also noted that even if the Vaughan property portion of the situation is not finalized soon, Anoka County has guaranteed clear title to the property by April 15, 1998. He noted that the Rehbein property was purchased by a contract for deed and will be paid in the year 2002. The Funkhauser property was purchased in late 1997 and will be paid late in the year 2002. The development of the Village planned in phases as follows: Phase I, the Fairview Clinic was constructed in 1997 and dedicated in March, 1998. Phase II, the government buildings will be constructed in 1998 and completed in 1999. Phase III, the YMCA will begin construction in 1999. Mary Divine presented a fact sheet regarding the Village development, Phases I and II. She noted that the development of the Tagg property is still undecided. Andy asked if the Taggs know that there property is to be included in the Village development. Brian said yes and noted that the development of the City owned property is making the Tagg property all the more valuable. Andy asked if it would be wise to buy the Tagg property at this time. Brian said yes if the price is right. Brian explained that the clinic had paid $2.50 per square foot for their building site and the bank paid $5.00 per square foot for their building site. John said it appeared to him that the Tagg property would develop in phases. He felt the land closest to the highway was the most valuable. John asked if this happens, how far could development go before the City says the Tagg business can no longer stay. Brian explained that the Taggs want to sell their property all in one piece. He felt that the majority of the property would be housing. The Taggs have approximately 25 acres. Kim asked will the Village pay for itself. Brian said it would pay for all of the land acquisition costs plus some "soft" costs. CIVIC COMPLEX, BRIAN WESSEL Brian provided a schedule that indicated that the civic complex would be completed in mid 1999. Andy asked why the Police building and the Early Childhood Learning Center couldn't all be built together. Brian said that the foundation of all three (3) buildings PAGE 2 • MINUTES MARCH 16, 1998 including the city hall will be started at the same time. He outlined the budget approved by the City Council in November, 1997 (Schedule "C"). Brian noted that Adolphson and Peterson has guaranteed that the construction costs will not exceed $6,000,000. Brian outlined funding for the entire civic center complex. (See Scheduled "D") He noted that Area and Unit Fund will be used to fund the Early Childhood Center. The fund would be reimbursed over the period of 10 years by the payment of the lease for this building. He noted that the bonds required for the complex construction are 15 year bonds. Kim asked when the citizens will see this proposal and when will taxes be impacted. Brian stated that taxes will be impacted in 1999. John asked how payments would be made on the bond issue and the loan from the Area and Unit Charge fund. He noted that the payments would be over $300,000.00. Kim expressed concern that the Council will have to go back through this presentation when Mary Vaske is available and also that Chris has not made arrangements to go through this. It was noted that Chris will make arrangements to go through this presentation. Kim said she felt it was imperative that all members of this team attend the next session on this issue. YMCA/COMMUNITY CENTER, MARY ALICE DIVINE/BRIAN WESSEL Mary Alice handed out a list of projects beginning in 1991 through 1998 of businesses that have located in Lino Lakes or are planning to locate in 1998 (Schedule "E") She explained that a market research study was prepared by the YMCA and the results are very positive. She also noted Schedule "F" which indicates that the 20/20 Vision project and the 1997 Citizens Survey indicated that citizen support is very strong for this facility. Mary Alice provided details of the market research study and explained what services would be available to the citizens. (Schedule "G") Mary Alice detailed the funding strategy. The facility is planned to be a joint partnership between the YMCA and the City. She noted that the YMCA has never constructed a facility with a partner. This will be "new ground" for both the YMCA and the City. Mary Alice detailed the reasons the City should become a partner in this venture. (Schedule "H") She explained that property tax effect if the City bonds for $1.5 million would be $2.70 per year on a $150,000 home. John noted the facility would be 50,000 square feet. Mary Alice said that is approximately the size of the White Bear Lake YMCA located near highways 694 and White Bear Avenue PARKS/ATHLETIC COMPLEX, RICK DeGardner Rick explained that at the last Council work session he asked the Council to tell his department what they should do regarding the possibility of a bond referendum considering that a athletic complex site cannot be secured. He was told to continue PAGE 3 MINUTES MARCH 16, 1998 looking for a site and to hold off on making further plans for the referendum but not completely disregard the possibility of a bond referendum. Rick noted that the Centennial School District will be placing a bond referendum on the November, 1998 election ballot. If the City wishes to also place a bond referendum on the ballot, he would suggest the Council consider Schedule I attached to these minutes which provides details on what would be included in the bond referendum for park and trail purposes. This Schedule outlined three (3) different options for the bond and the tax impact on a $125,000, $150,000 and a $200,000 house. The Council discussed several sites for the athletic complex. Andy asked about the 40 acres owned by Centennial School on Birch Street. Rick explained that he had talked to Mr. McClellan who said that the district plans to build a pre-school/kindergarten facility on that site. He also noted that Centennial School is also unwilling to allow the development of temporary soccer fields at this site. Kim asked Brian if he had discussed some sites with Rick. Brian said yes and noted that Rick has been talking to Gerald Rehbein who owns land north of Main Street between I - 35E and 20th Avenue. Brian also noted that Rick has talked to Paul Montain about property on Centerville Road and Birch Street. Rick has also talked to North Oaks. This group owns land in Lino Lakes on the south side of County Road J (Ash Street). Rick was told that there will be residential development in that area with a neighborhood park. There would not be enough land for an athletic complex. Kim said that if a referendum is pursued, she would favor bonding for all of the park needs. John suggested asking the landowners of prospective athletic complex sites if they are not interested in selling to the City at this time, would they entertain an option on the property or the right of first refusal. Either situation would help identify the future site of the complex. FUNDING SOURCES AREA AND UNIT CHARGE FUND - Brian explained that this fund has a fund balance in excess of $4,000,000. He noted that this is a healthy fund however, it has not been adjusted to reflect the impact of the Shoreview Joint Powers Agreement. Brian said he was very conservative in estimating the Area and Unit Charge Fund needs in the funding he proposes. He noted that the SAC Fund contains enough dollars to resolve issues with the fund. Caroline asked when the Council will know the outcome of the Shoreview situation. Brian explained at the last work session in April. The SAC Fund concern will be addressed at the first Council work session in April. John asked Brian and Dave Ahrens if they have identified all the major items that can impact the Area and Unit Fund in the next five (5) years. Dave said the lift station issues PAGE 4 • MINUTES MARCH 16, 1998 have not been identified because the construction of lift stations are "driven" by development. In addition, the costs of lift stations vary a great deal. BONDS - Kim asked how the City determines the maximum amount it can bond. Brian explained that the top dollar amount is determined by a number of factors. He has spoken to Jerry Shannon of Springsted, Inc. who has indicated that the maximum the City can bond is 12 to 13 million dollars. Kim asked if the City bonded for all of the items presented this evening, what impact would this have on property taxes. Dave Pecchia explained that the taxes on a $150,000 home would increase by $250.00 per year. In addition, if the school bond passes, there will be a further impact. Dave asked the Council to review the materials provided this evening and then if they have further questions regarding specific proposals for bonding, they should call that department head. If the Council has questions regarding the financial aspect of tonight's presentation they should call Mary Vaske. It was decided to continue this meeting on March 30, 1998 at 6:00 p.m. Kim requested that some of the board members and Superintendent McClellan be asked to attend this next meeting. • Kim asked what the impact of levy limits have on the City. John asked staff to determine what effect would levy limits have in terms of bond payment. Brian said he would have Jerry Shannon attend the next meeting. Kim noted that the Council should set a date to continue the goal setting meeting from March 7, 1998. The meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on April 13, 1998. (1-1-4,,' 6 „,., N4t -lyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Kim PAGE 5 ullivan, Mayor City of Lino Lakes Protect Cost and Funding Year Project Name Total Cost 5CheduLe " ,9 '' Current Funding Sources Area and Surface Anoka Total Unit Water Mngt TIF MSA County Centerville Assessments Bond Funding 1998 Ware Road 1,682,650 b 478,317 73,853 Lilac Lateral 176,729 b 176,729 Lake Business Center 125,000 d 125,000 Apollo Drive III 356,428 a 21st Avenue - Phase I 605,105 c,f 289,075 Black Duck Lift Station 200,000 b 200,000 Village Infrastructure 505,732 b 505,732 1,130, 480 280,130 76,298 158,015 158,015 Subtotal 1998 No Bonding 3,651,644 1,269,121 73,853 505,732 1,130,480 280,130 158,015 234,313 Lake's Addition 2,250,694 c 460,594 Otter Lake Road Realign 1,110,289 c,e 75,000 244,347 Lake Trunk - Phase I 2,441,961 c Lilac Trunk Utilities 895,795 c 389,711 1,682,650 176,729 125,000 356,428 605,105 200,000 505,732 Future Funding Sources Anoka County Taxes Assessments Future City Cost 240,428 (311,742) 292,002 115,273 329,060 204,060 67,057 67,057 137,317 (151,758) (200,000) 0 0 3,651,644 0 0 1,065,864 (277,110) 1,790,100 790,942 2,441,961 506,084 2,250,694 1,110,289 678,343 2,441,961 895,795 1,432,080 358,020 274,545 1,766,757 778,486 (460,594) (44,802) (675,204) (117,309) Subtotal 1998 Bonding 6,698,739 925,305 244,347 0 0 0 0 0 5,529,087 6,698,739 678,343 1,432,080 3,177,808 (1,297,909) 1998 Total Projects 10,350,383 2,194,426 318,200 505,732 1,130,480 280,130 158,015 234,313 5,529,087 10,350,383 678,343 1,432,080 4,243,672 1,575,019 836,479 1999 Lake Trunk - Phase II 836,479 c 836,479 0 Otter Lake Service Road 387,955 c 387,955 387,955 1999 Total Projects 1,224,434 836,479 0 0 0 0 0 387,955 0 1,224,434 0 0 320,608 (515,871) 2000 21st Avenue - Phase II 629,272 314,636 314,636 629,272 269,240 269,240 Street Reconstruction 761,140 240,000 521,140 761,140 416,912 236,955 (107,273) Elm Street Reconstruction 862,500 217,500 45,000 600,000 862,500 (262,500) Water Treatment Plant 750,000 750,000 750,000 (750,000) 2000 Total Projects 3,002,92 1,207,500 45,000 0 600,000 0 314,636 314,636 521,140 3,002,912 0 416,912 506,195 (850,533) 2001 Street Reconstruction 2,635,960 1,350,000 1,285,960 2,635,960 1,028,768 257,192 (1,350,000) 2001 Total Projects 2,635,960 1,350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,285,960 2,635,960 0 1,028,768 257,192 (1,350,000) 2002 Street Reconstruction 1,898,100 612,000 1,286,100 1,898,100 1,028,880 257,220 (612,000) 2002 Total Projects 1,898,100 612,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,286,100 1,898,100 0 1,028,880 257,220 (612,000), 2003 Street Reconstruction 1,947,100 378,000 1,569,100 1,947,100 1,255,280 313,820 (378,000) 2003 Total Protects 1,947,100 378,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,569,100 1,947,100 0 1,255,280 313,820 (378,000) 320,608 (515,871) a Council has ordered feasibility report. b Council has approved plans and specs. c Council has ordered plans and specs. d Approved by P & Z e Draft agreement received, needs Council approval. f Council approved agreement. 3/16/98 `� • • • yawn By JCW WARE ROAD Date: 4-28-97 Orr Aselen Asocie Meyeron & societes,Inc. 6oslnnnn • Architects • Planners • Surveyors Drawing Title WATERMAIN WARE ROAD LINO LAKES. MINNESOTA Sheet no. i SJ G ©WI peapvRy,:y 0 oe miSti GEDG�o • ti `,.,:.�:-..ten, nn o LirialooP. Ao ukiTkritGC0 WI po wo oc*Len o 0 4 itr5�o CI iiiIi rind• :1 �•M= O n�UGO G.rCGCGC III MCI al, 00 P Lr. r�.rv.rv�r!' WM OONZ o rOr� • t7© MI !■ RICE LAKE LILAC STREET• UTILITY EXTENSIOI HAM z_ —f f w, a m a. m 'VC N.C. m i PROJECT LOCATION Peltier L Pel tie, Lake .uw ro. , m. . w•..o.. cia cY —f -f Sherman Lake d' d p FILE NO. ALINOL9808.00 DATE: 02/06/98 APOLLO DRIVE PHASE THREE LINO LAKES, MN Fil'll�r 1 , 1, . -e6 i Commercia TOWN CE R PARKWAY CONSERVATION/ EASEMENT 'I ' t vkl4Ris / *I* sk-rfaa.4- 1SHANAU LAKE • Ic1elt4.3c.1c by, Lit - s‘•..4.ve,,, SA I 1; I.••••••• ,-0 250 0 250 125 RESHANAU LAKE '3 I , i • -.4- 7 \ : , x...)-4. -.7 ..... ••••., - - .. LANI-ORN!L6-. _L J .i2j 1 \ < _ - ; .BLACK DOCK ' C .. . r 0 u1r r, 2 1 i ,•- I1i - -- . - CAPITAINS PL I Z AMIWAIr584 FILE NO. LIN0L9716.00 DATE: 6/23/97 STREET IMPROVEMENTS LAKES ADDITION LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA • EX' NC I I II II II II II II ,,I iII 2 II 24TH AVENUE S0. 0 \\ 100' ROW ELEV. TANK 0 NO. 2 0 13 I 0 -C 0 CY 100' ROW�1 10 a. J -J OTT R LAKE RD. (C.R.84) ziI.3__ INTERSTATE HWY. 0 35E NO 4 PROPOSED CEDAR ST. LIFT 5TAT104 1 CONSTRUCTION LABOR EDUCATION & TRAINING 24-31-22-14-0003 2 TAYLOR CORPORATION 24-31-22-14-0002 3 CYRIL H. LoCASSE JR. 24-31-22-41-0001 4 CYRIL H. LoCASSE JR. 24-31-22-44-0001 5 EOUITY RECOVERY CORP. 24-31-22-13-0002 6 RICHARD SCHREIER 24-31-22-13-0001 7 PAUL MILLER 24-31-22-42-0010 8 EUGENE ARNT 24-31-22-42-0009 9 EUGENE & BEATRICE ARNT 24-31-22-42-0006 10 PAUL MILLER 24-31-22-42-0004 11 ARNT FAMILY LTD PTNSP 24-31-22-42-0011 12 EUGENE ARNT 24-31-22-42-0007 13 PAUL MILLER 24-31-22-43-0008 14 DARREL KOTNE 24-31-22-43-0010 15 WAYNE SCANLAN 24-31-22-43-0009 16 RICHARD & CHERYL MARTINEK 24-31-22-43-0006 OTTER LAKE ROAD REALIGNMENT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COM.1O. 11085 1 IWRIVEE-..kut4 4111•11111111111111/11; 111 ecaT���„Jr AmEnzupcmcg, Er AA) aaQ�i�� 0�9 d o:pit I pt AW; NM .... ..fit ti iaap � 0�0lff 00i a0;oo oo ma o'p a�o'A;� miuI.jJ _ g58-1 MOWERS I ARCHITECTS 1.LANIVERS ALTERNATE A REVISE LAKE DRIVE TRUNK SANITARY SEWER LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA 9708,Q( ORG..NC 2A M Pe: • , •c 1 .., i FL.IiRtii GLE:, V .1th AVE. /4.E. ! 1 ---7.$ ,•-• • • t/ (..", : -.-......-- •,--,, 4 w i '1',1 ' i .:.•1 z i i 1 mm4,:-f ;I. • /7 ? -:"I'l-_';::". Mth AV. •i4'4 ) ......---- AC`,..lri_C• OR. ." ...-.....- il 7;:7 ) ?..r. i it , i'M'iC illy/1 .....-55:---;--- ,,....--•:.:7;---- a :.:-; 3 i i4 P22.W ; i.: 1 i 20 if J--'"--:.- ., n. R411 Ct. OYER L. \ 1..- ;:dijr- . ,,r, .....--<--------- ,, IV: tr av ----r----,---7-"'— fr-7---'7-T-7-..--;17-i-i7r ---r------4----7 ; 1,....4, .; g...:_.s1 \- 1 114*'7',.„Afil 1- 1 11'1? :4•,-1 141-•'‘`':... 1 • t$,..,%Ll -i•- •1 •••••• 1 ,-,1 tiKit-itituiled, i.e:.4 ..i,-1 i _1,,. 1 -ItrfriE::11A ,. i -1:., PROPOSED TRUNK UTILITY PROJECT RECOMMENDED WATERMAIN "LOOP" i R.. i,5 .W PROJECT LOCATION ,,,:i i i4 ..i. .-. , .F.-.. , I ,, i Nc • !,;; z I .-:•.,. 4.; 1 ,-, I , 1 .4. i ,T c• I - i 1 k k..'.) q.kiN ,....... I VICK? 7iii; — LLZM e. •::;', .-; ./ _........ .. LINO LAKE t9'30 P)P. 3807 ... ).*ii S ) - '... T ..:-, :,.. ":..f.., ----- -L- --.../ ,3 • i -- L. ii:ti:, 1... ... ,•;',/ •-i i iZ 1 i -- ./---. ' i-731 • .....: i ,erLay/ 1 ---. ; L.e7E.E..kmoi.:* - i.._ • ., ...... „... i L'f'• PRCRI.f. YR"; ; 1 Pl... • ,,..- / .' • 1-1-, ; i ..• ''''; • i :4 ‘/. a I IV.P..;AS ST. 1 ,.---.:;-- 1 ; • i / r— ; .; ..1-27:31 t--,/. . (3--K) ---:::- i ....... .1.3,1•; R22,4 :ji; I 1 i ..":` . • ..s.1 I I i ..0,2',"..-itCil ‘.!.i ! • . „ ; 1 I , 3'07 ' 30' . ".„. .-.. -;C"- ; ,/ / / I LI i ks ; ....-- .f.,..---..::::-;• \ \\\ i • - ,',•:..t..- -- MINNESOTA C.OrRECTiu••1L FACILITIE • "i'/•.:••• f'" ; \ ',1\1 (-1 •;1 i•lo.c.454virt`rtovkk \MACes PROJECT LOCATION MAP LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA Drawn By: P.L.J. Figure no. 1 Comm. No. 97124.00 Date: 11/11/97 31 1 ti 1 1 in gokr pF00a0710� '=_g6'y •eecoo 2116b1" .au.6, 11 Iinit411111"Wiallaill, D210112,61 am app.. mats! AMMO p ►Qirl tial� 1® 10gimlet es N DAIRRI „re atisw 0 , Mari Amaw-o ■�=!■: ®■uoo 0 .� -- viii �; ■ �'�'!!� • i T.C. 9 INV. 892.20 G weTCH LAKE ADDENDUEM ONE LAKE DRIVE TRUNK SYSTEM TRUNK SANITARY SEWER LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA DRG. -NO. 1 24TH AVENUE S0. \4% I 1 1 • 04Veg 'gawk". Ro..d INTERSTATE 1 1 00' ROW - i- - �- -1- ____S_ ELEV. TANK 0 NO. 2 ALIGNMENT 0 0 cn a_ J LU Q. r� OTTER LAKE RD. (q. R. 84) c'.1 HWY. (\ O. 35E ALIGNMENT "C" c) Otter Lake CITY OF LINO LAKES STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 1996 BASIC DATA — 1990 S LEGEND INTERSTATE TRUNK HIGHWAY U.S. TRUNK HIGHWAY STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY COUNTY. ROAD CORPORATE LIMITS PUBLIC ROAD PRIVATE ROAD 0 04) 114 RECOMMENDED STREET IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1 0 PHASE 2 cti PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 LOWER PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS Bald Eagle Lake EXHIBIT 2 u R \\ 0 R M K TMe.h.r Square, 700 Th0d Street 59. Otter Lake Bald Eagle Lake 111 CITY OF LINO LAKES STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM W 1996 BASIC DATA - 1990 S LEGEND INTERSTATE TRUNK HIGHWAY U.S. TRUNK HIGHWAY STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY COUNTY ROAD CORPORATE UMITS PUBUC ROAD PRIVATE ROAD E C3 RECOMMENDED STREET IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 LOWER PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 2 MOLLY ORIK_ 111 CITY OF LINO LAKES STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM W 1996 BASIC DATA — 1990 LEGEND INTERSTATE TRUNK HIGHWAY.. U.S. TRUNK HIGHWAY STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY COUNTY ROAD CORPORATE LIMITS PUBLIC ROAD PRIVATE ROAD E 0 RECOMMENDED STREET IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 CC PHASE 4 PHASE 5 LOWER PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS Bald Eagle Lake EXHIBIT 2 meaner Sq . •vd Street So. • • Otter Lake Bald Eagle Loke X/1 CITY OF LINO LAKES STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAN 1996 BASIC DMA - 1990 S LEGEND INTERSTATE TRUNK HIGHWAY U.S. TRUNK HIGHWAY STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY COUNTY ROAD CORPORATE LIMITS PUBLIC ROAD PRIVATE ROAD E C3 RECOMMENDED STREET IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 .�.�� LOWER PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 2 I,RA eRMNG TMnn.r Span, 700 Third Str«1 S. unn.epdh, MN SSCS, PM.. 612/370-0700. Fax 612/370-1370 r p r 0 z a. 0 v z Otter Lake CITY. OF LINO LAKES STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 1996 BASIC DATA - 1990 S LEGEND INTERSTATE TRUNK HIGHWAY U.S. TRUNK HIGHWAY STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY COUNTY ROAD CORPORATE LIMITS PUBLIC ROAD PRIVATE ROAD IO RECOMMENDED STREET IMPROVEMENTS -I� PHASE 1 0 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 s LOWER PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS Bald Eagle Lake EXHIBIT 2 Thresh_ SWart + 5beel So. N. rN tc.,• o•-..• eron,o-roM cn. 8,7/170-1178 • sch e ckft, "d' VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT/PHASE I -- LAND PHASE I: LAND PURCHASE DATE LAND COST PRICE PAID OWED TERM (acres) (Per SF) 3/24/97 Rehbein Land 13.84 1.75 $1,036,728.00 $543,140.00 $493,588.00 1/2002 11/24/97 Funkhouser Land 6.60 1.75 515,435.00 167,797.00 347,638.00 12/2002 4/15/98 County Land 14.72 .30 200,000.00 TOTAL: 35.16 1.15 $1,752,163.00 $710,937.00 $841,226.00 Estimated nonreimbursable "soft costs" (interest, taxes, fees): $125,000.00 PHASE I LAND SALE 7/9/97 Fairview Clinic 1.72 2.50 $189,575.00 11/24/97 Lino Lakes State Bank 1.00 5.00 217,800.00 3/15/99 Professional Office/Retail 6.50 4.00 1,132,560.00 9/15/99 Old Police Station Site 4.00 2.00 350,000.00 TOTAL: 13.22 3.28 $1,889,935.00 .SCI e 4C, CIVIC COMPLEX (3/16/98) 1. CITY COUNCIL BUDGET APPROVAL (NOVEMBER 1997) CITY HALL: $3,000,000 POLICE DEPARTMENT: 3,000,000 EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: 1,200,000 SITE PREPARATION: 500,000 TOTAL: $7,700,000 3. COST ESTIMATE A. "SOFT" COSTS 1. PROFESSIONAL FEES (Planning, architectural/engineering/consultants) $670,000 2. FURNISHING/EQUIPMENT: 450,000 3. COMMUNICATIONS:TECHNOLOGY: 340,000 4. CONTINGENCY: 190,000 5. SAC/WAC: 50,000 SUBTOTAL: $1,700,000 B. CONSTRUCTION: $6,000,000 TOTAL: $7,700,000 • • • • City of Lino Lakes Civic Center Complex Funding Available Cash Area and Unit Fund Surface Water Management Fund Closed Bond Fund Apollo Drive Construction Industrial Park Fund Water Operating Sewer Operating Total Cash Contribution T.I.F. Proceeds Area and Unit 1 Bond Total Bonding Options for ECFE Special Assessment Projects Lakes Addition Civic Complex YMCA Parks Referendum Total Possible Bonding Current Bonds Payable 12/31/97 35W Bridge Reconstruction 3/16/98 Se4ectie "A Feb. 28, 1998 Cash Balance 6,285,109 1,066,654 1,108, 299 337,337 480,258 280,127 434,485 3,738,987 1,790,100 3,500,000 2,000,000 6,000,000 17,029,087 13,085,000 1,000,000 Contribution 500,000 250,000 950,000 300,000 470,000 115,000 115,000 2,700,000 300,000 1,200,000 3,500,000 7,700,000 City Maximum Tax Bonds Less: Civic Complex Less: YMCA Less: Park Referendum Total Remaining 1, 12,500,000 (3,500,000) (2,000,000) (6,000,000) 1,000,000 6ch e_1LLe., E Attachment C LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL PROJECTS PROJECT YEAR PROJECT VALUE ON TAX ROLLS BUSINESS TYPE 1. EMTECH (plus addition) (A) 1991 $705,640.00 2004 Industrial 2. ACCU-TOOL (Improvement) (A) 1993 300,000.00 2003 Industrial 1994 218,700.00 2003 Industrial 3.UDOR, U.S.A. (A) 4. NOL -TEC (A) 1995 928,050.00 2004 Industrial 5. BLUE HERON (A) 1995 920,000.00 1998 Industrial 6. MAG -CON (A) 1995 730,250.00 2004 Industrial 7. MEDCENTERS (A) 1996 805,000.00 1999 Commercial 8. LINO LAKES BUS. CENTER #1 (A) 1996 1,390,000.00 2004 Industrial 9. PROGRESSIVE ENGINEERING (A) 1996 762,000.00 2004 Industrial 10. ADGRAPHICS (CC) 1996 5,100,000.00 2003 Industrial 11. NORTHERN WHOLESALE (CC) 1996 2,960,000.00 2003 Industrial 12. EAM (A) 1997 245,000.00 2004 Industrial 13. LINO LAKES BIZ. CTR #2&3 (A) 1997 2,200,000.00 2002 Industrial 14. GNW MACHINE (CC) 1997 1,900,000.00 2002 Industrial 15. FAIRVIEW CLINIC (V) 1997 900,000.00 2004 Commercial 16. RICE INDUSTRIES (A) 1997 565,000.00 2004 Industrial 17. LINO LAKES STATE BANK (V) 1997 1,000,000.00 2000 Commercial 18. ASHLAND CONVIENCE CTR (TC) 1998 1,200,000.00 2000 Commercial 19. AMOCO/CULVERS (CC) 1998 2,000,000.00 2000 Commercial 20. LAKELAND NAT'L BANK (TC) 1998 1,000,000.00 2000 Commercial 21. G.M. DEVELOPMENT SITE (A) 1998 5,000,000.00 2004 Industrial 22. OFFICE/MANUFACTURING (CC) 1998 3,000,000.00 2004 Industrial 23. INCUBATOR BUILDING (LB) 1998 1,300,000.00 2004 Industrial 24. KKE SHOPPING CENTER (TC) 1998 4,000,000.00 2001 Commercial TOTAL: $39,129,640.00 (A -Apollo; CC -Clearwater Creek; LB -Lakes Business Park; TC -Town Center; V Village) • • • SC /1 e QL,Lt_ " F " 20/20 VISION • "ESTABLISH A GATHERING PLACE AND RECREATION FACILITY WITHIN A 'CITY CAMPUS' ENVIRONMENT." • "EVALUATE THE POTENTIAL OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP(S) IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A RECREATIONAL CENTER" • "DEVELOP A PLAN THAT ENSURES THAT THE RECREATION CENTER IS SELF-SUPPORTING WITHIN 3 YEARS OF START-UP" CITIZENS SURVEY • 77% OF RESIDENTS FAVOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A COMMUNITY CENTER • 59% OF RESIDENTS SUPPORT THE ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION BONDS TO BUILD A COMMUNITY CENTER • 73% OF RESIDENTS SUPPORT OPERATION OF ALL OR PARTS OF A COMMUNITY CENTER BY A PRIVATE COMPANY MARKET RESEARCH STUDY • 1,112 LINO LAKES HOUSEHOLDS WOULD JOIN A YMCA IN LINO LAKES • 26% OF HOUSEHOLDS IN MARKET AREA ARE INTERESTED IN A YMCA IN LINO LAKES (HIGHER THAN NATIONAL AVERAGE) • 15% OF AREA HOUSEHOLDS IN MARKET AREA HAVE A `GREAT DEAL OF INTEREST' (3X THE NATIONAL AVERAGE) • 88% FIND THE VILLAGE LOCATION CONVENIENT 5&\A YMCA 1,112 LINO LAKES HOUSEHOLDS WOULD JOIN THE YMCA IF IT WERE BUILT PROJECT SCOPE LOCATION: CITY OWNED LAND IN THE VILLAGE SIZE: 45-50,000 SQUARE FLET COST: $5.5 MILLION (EXCLUDING LAND) • AQUATICS: TWO POOLS (WARM AND COLD) • GYMNASIUM • INDOOR TRACK • FITNESS/CARDIOVASCULAR • AEROBICS ROOM • MULTI -USE AREA • ADVENTURE AREA/TEEN CENTER • LOCKERS (MEN/WOMEN'S/FAMILY • • sch e tou. e fi� FUNDING STRATEGY FOR $5.5 MILLION YMCA FACILITY 1. YMCA OF GREATER ST. PAUL: $1,000,000 2. YMCA OF MINNEAPOLIS: 1,000,000 3. CITY OF LINO LAKES: 1,500,000 (plus land & infrastructure) 4. FUNDRAISING/PARTNERSHIPS: 2,000,000 TOTAL: $5,500,000 WHY SHOULD THE CITY CONTRIBUTE? • A YMCA HAS A POSITIVE IMPACT ON A COMMUNITY'S IDENTITY • A COMMUNITY CENTER COULD BE BUILT IN THE VILLAGE FOR $1.5 MILLION IN PUBLIC MONEY VERSUS $5.5 MILLION, AND IT COULD BE DONE WITHIN 2 YEARS • CITY OWNED COMMUNITY CENTERS LOSE MONEY AND NEED A CONTINUING INPUT OF PUBLIC DOLLARS FOR OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE • MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNTS TO ALL LINO LAKES RESIDENTS • WEEKLY COMMUNITY DAYS AND FAMILY NIGHTS FOR NONMEMBERS • YMCA OF THIS SIZE ATTRACTS 500-800 UNITS OF MEMBERSHIP PER DAY (FAMILIES/SINGLE MEMBERS) • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE: A YMCA IS A MAJOR ATTRACTION FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS AND ESSENTIAL TO SUCCESS OF THE VILLAGE • OFFERS THE COMMUNITY AN OPPORTUNITY FOR COOPERATIVE PARTNERSHIPS WITH CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT AND FAIRVIEW HOSPITALS 1998 PARKS BOND REFERENDUM OPTIONS March 16, 1998 Option 1 Neighborhood Park Improvements 1.2 million Birch Street Trail Segment 118,000 Total Option 1 $1.318 million Option 2 Neighborhood Park Improvements 1.2 million Birch Street Trail Segment 118,000 Land Acquisition — Rec Complex 1 million Total Option 2 $2.318 million Option 3 Neighborhood Park Improvements 1.2 million Birch Street Trail Segment 118,000 Land Acquisition - Recreation Complex 1 million Development of Recreation Complex 3.2 million Total Option 3 Estimated Annual Tax Impact (Monthly): $5.518 million Assessed Value - $125,000 $150,000 $200,000 2 million 36 (3.00) 43 (3.58) 58 (4.83) 3 million 54 (4.50) 65 (5.42) 87 (7.25) 4 million 72 (6.00) 87 (7.25) 116 (9.67) 5 million 90 (7.50) 108 (9.00) 145 (12.08) 6 million 103 (8.58) 122 (10.17) 163 (13.58) PARK, RECREATION, FORESTRY, & RECYCLING DEPARTMENTS 7204 Lake Drive • Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 55014 Phone: 617-780-1885 • Fax: 612-784-7227 • • • • • 1998 PARKS BOND REFERENDUM Cost Summaries Neighborhood Park Improvements Provide for amenities and park improvements in 18 neighborhood parks, and two tennis courts at Rice Lake Elementary School. Includes 11 playground structures, completion of internal trail segments in 9 neighborhood parks. Neighborhood Park Improvements Total $1.2 million Trail Segment Birch Street from Black Duck Drive east to Waterworks line (just east of Sherman Lake Road). North to the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Trail System. Trail Segment Total $118,000 Recreation Complex Provide athletic and recreational facilities for residents. Estimate 1,800 Lino Lakes youth will register for baseball, softball, and soccer in 1998. Does not include adult softball leagues. Possible Parcels: Noren/Lundgren Property 80 Acres County Road J & Holly Drive $12,000 - $15,000 per acre? Montain Property 70 Acres Birch Street & Centerville Road $15,000 per acre (negotiable?) Gerald Rehbein Property 60-80 Acres 20th Ave Near 77th Street $10,000 per acre Recreation Complex Costs (approximates) Land Acquisition $1 million Development $3.2 million Recreation Complex Total $4.2 million Possible Addition: Renovate Parks and Recreation Office $20,000 RD/ref pres to council 3-12 1998 PARKS BOND REFERENDUM Neighborhood Park Improvements Summary Arena Acres Playground Equipment (Replace) Resurface Tennis Courts (2) Windscreen on fencing Park Benches Picnic Tables Behms Playground Equipment Site Grading 1/2 Court Basketball Informal Ballfield Internal Trail Park Benches (2) Birch Playground Equipment (Addition) 1/2 Court Basketball Picnic Shelter(12x20) Picnic Tables (4) Grills Park Benches (2) Trails Birchwood Acres Playground Equipment (Addition) Internal Trails (1700 ft) '/2 Court Basketball Sand Volleyball Court Picnic Tables (2) Park Benches (2) Brandywood Playground Equipment (New) 1/2 Court Basketball Park Benches (2) Picnic Tables (2) City Hall 1/2 Court Basketball Player Benches (2) Bleachers (3 rows x 21') Irrigation Pave Rink Clearwater Creek Trails Development Country Lakes Playground Equipment (New) Group Picnic Shelter Internal Trails Sand Volleyball Horseshoes 1/2 Court Basketball Park Benches (4) Lino Playground Equipment (Replace) Replace Backstop Player Benches (2) Bleachers (3 row x 21') Irrigation Marshan Playground Equipment (New) Informal Ballfield 1/2 Court Basketball Picnic Tables (2) Park Benches (2) Internal Trails Pheasant Hills Complete Internal Trails Class V and Bit.(560 ft) Bituminous (380 ft) 1/2 Court Basketball Horseshoes Landscaping Park Benches (2) Picnic Tables (2) Bridge Overlook Sitting Area Quail Ridge Playground Equipment (New) Site Prep Trails (1700 ft) 1/2 Court Basketball Horseshoe Site Amenities Fixed boardwalk (165 ft) Rice Lake Estates Playground Equipment (New) Complete Internal Trails Tennis Court 1/2 Court Basketball Park Benches (2) Shenandoah Playground Equipment (Replace) 'A Court Basketball Park Benches (2) Picnic Tables (2) Site Work Turf, Aglime, Fencing Sunrise Bleachers (5 row x 21 feet) Pave Rink Replace Backstops (2) Player Benches (4) Irrigation Sunset Oaks 1/2 Court Basketball Landscaping (Leveling, Seeing, Trees) Picnic Tables (2) Park Benches (2) Wenzel Farms Landscaping Woolans Park Park Benches (2) Rice Lake Elementary Tennis Courts (2) Additional Items Sentence To Service Concrete for trash, etc Expand Playground Areas Trash Receptacles RD/Citycoun/efneighsummary March 12, 1998 • • • LAND USE PLANNING AND DESIGN Date: 3/12/98 Rick DeGardner, Parks and Recreation Director Lino Lakes Park and Recreation Department 7204 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Dear Rick, Enclosed you will find a reduced copy and full size plan of a revised athletic complex layout based on the following parameters: • Limit amenities to the primary facilities as shown • Use a layout configuration that minimizes the amount of land required to accommodate these facilities while still meeting the needs of the users • Create a layout that can be accommodated on a variety of properties Based on these parameters, the total minimum land area we suggest you consider is 60 acres. The plan as shown consumes slightly less than that, but that is based on finding the perfect parcel of land that has minimal grading concerns and no wetlands or other protected areas. Also note that the configuration as shown is tight with respect to the relationships between fields and parking Tots. As such, a minimum of 60 acres seems warranted to allow us to loosen things up so that the relationship between facilities would be more comfortable. Aso, you may want to allow yourself some reserve land for future expansion. I would suggest another I 0 acres would suffice to provide reasonable reserve land. With respect to location, the property previously being considered in the south-central part of the community remains the most optimal in my mind for a number of reasons. First, the property is well situated for relatively easy access for a large portion of the city's population — now as well as in the future. Second, this location also services some of the community park needs for this area of the community, such as the hockey rinks, tennis courts, basketball, etc. Third, the soil conditions appear to be more desirable in this location than the one we looked at in the northeast park of the community. This is important in that the cost to provide underdrainage and/or soil amendments for fields built on clays verses more sandy soils can easily range from $40,000 to $60,000 per field if the work is completed by a contractor. I recognize that land availability and/or the opportunity to acquire it in a timely manner are critical factors in site selection.1 also recognize that you and the Park Commission have put forth considerable effort in reaching a satisfactory agreement on a desirable parcel of property that simply hasn't worked out. The realities of the situation may be such that the choices are simply becoming more and more limited and perhaps fast fleeting. That being said, I still encourage the City to continue to pursue the earlier parcel because it is, in my opinion, a much more desirable location for the complex. Please call with questions. Thank you. enbauer, V e 'resident 7301 Ohms Lane, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55439 Tel (612) 832-9475 Fax (612) 832-9542 CONCEPT PLAN Typical Recreation Complex City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Y1 ! Prepared By: Brauer & Associates, Ltd. ombinatio BallfieId (300') .. Combination Ballfield'` (300') ^' �iw.. „�..' ,ea � '•'�'+ w, ' '� ! '41' �-i=4. a . • 'his * sL- ws. b ... •.-..I4.6s■ =viei .4.9 till • Uicni3 -- Pc ? W W Shelter Children's Play Area j 225'x360' 225'x360' 225'x360' 225'x360' 225': Athletic Field Athletic Field Athletic Field Athletic Field Athlet: 0 60 120 180 mummilml rommom St AL= I N UN1TS