My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/22/1999 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1999
>
11/22/1999 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2015 2:25:20 PM
Creation date
2/3/2015 8:53:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/22/1999
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 22, 1999 <br />installation is only 25% of the assessment costs. The City could investigate the possibility of <br />completing the project without storm sewer. Staff noted the City does prefer to install the storm <br />sewer as proposed. <br />Mr. Peterson stated his assessment charge include $4,000 to run the sewer pipe in his yard twice. <br />He indicated that his assessment, therefore, ran $300 per foot. He indicated the sewer pipe <br />should not have to be run twice. He stated he could perform the installation at half the price. <br />Unit costs are based on bids within the City. <br />Ms. Cindy Bruneberg, 7941 Nancy Drive, asked the City to clarify that the residents specific to <br />Twilight 2°d Addition can upgrade their existing septic system. Staff advised residents initiated <br />this project. A septic designer would have to determine if each individual lot could support a <br />system upgrade. <br />Mr. Ray Johnson, 7971 Nancy Drive, asked why the neighborhood has to have curbs and sewer. <br />He stated the area has done without it for a long time. <br />Mayor Sullivan noted certain road standards are established so the <br />constructed throughout the City. The City will have to dete <br />acceptable. <br />Mr. Johnson asked why the residents along Lake <br />advised the lots along Lake Drive qualified for th <br />pertains to lots that can't be subdivided <br />ality roads are <br />in quality is <br />to hook up for $8,800. Staff <br />endment. The Bisel Amendment <br />pay only a small lot assessment. <br />Mr. Johnson asked for a copy of t nd ent and a copy of the ordinance relating to the <br />City's public improvement po, <br />Council Member D . • ve close the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. Council Member <br />Bergeson seconded the + • otion carried unanimously. <br />Council advised residen : have 60 days to petition against the project. Council will discuss the <br />project at the end of the 60 days. <br />Staff noted the public hearing is the starting point for the improvements. The Bisel Amendment <br />applies to sewer and water only. The road improvements are not covered under the Bisel <br />Amendment. <br />PUBLIC HEARING, Vicky Lane Utility Extension, John Powell — Staff advised on October <br />11, 1999, Council received a Feasibility Report, and set the public hearing, for the installation of <br />sanitary sewer and watermain service to the Nancy Drive/Vicky Lane neighborhood. This report <br />had been prepared in response to two (2) petitions received from Nancy Drive, and Vicky Lane, <br />area property owners. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.