Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 24, 2000 <br />leading to the multi -family designation on the draft comprehensive plan. No action has been <br />taken on this utility extension and that anticipated sale fell through. It would be cost prohibitive <br />to extend utilities to this property without a substantial redevelopment of the site. <br />The Zoning Ordinance provides "Habitable single family homes constructed prior to July 13, <br />1992, may reduce their lot size to a minimum of one (1) acre if the balance of the property results <br />in a parcel of 10 acres, or is serviced by public sewer...". Although this division will not create a <br />parcel 10 acres in size, it will provide a larger parcel than currently exists which is more in <br />keeping with the intent of the ordinance. <br />Granting approval to the minor subdivision will require approval of a variance for lot size. Staff <br />believes this is a unique situation not created by the property owner that will fit the variance <br />criteria listed below. <br />In considering all requests for a variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall <br />make a finding of fact: <br />1. That the property in question cannot be put to a e if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls. <br />2. That the plight of the landowners is ysi ircumstances unique to <br />his property not created by the landow <br />3. That the hardship is no <br />reasonable use for the pro der the terms of the ordinance. <br />consideration alone and when a <br />4. That granti <br />special privileg <br />buildings i <br />ce A=' quested will not confer on the applicant any <br />denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or <br />5. That p `s posed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance. <br />In response to the criteria above, staff commented that this minor subdivision would create a lot <br />for the existing home that is the same size as the adjoining properties and would bring the vacant <br />parcel closer compliance to the existing provisions of the ordinance. The current lot <br />configuration was created at a time when the minimum lot size was something less than 10 acres. <br />That situation is unique in relation to today's requirements. The hardship arises from the lot <br />configuration and unavailability of utilities. No special privilege is being extended, this item was <br />reviewed on a stand along basis and determined unique to the property in question. The spirit <br />and intent of the ordinance is to allow existing homes, construction prior to 1994, to subdivide <br />down to 1 acre and allow for future redevelopment in an appropriate manner. <br />Staff also noted, the applicant has had a septic designer inspect the property and determined an <br />alternate site for a system should the existing one fail. <br />